Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Paid $1M For 'Useless Intelligence' From Chalabi
Independent (UK) ^ | 9-30-2003 | Andrew Buncombe

Posted on 09/29/2003 3:06:44 PM PDT by blam

US paid $1m for 'useless intelligence' from Chalabi

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
30 September 2003

Information from Iraqi defectors made available by Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress before the US invasion was of little or no use, a Pentagon intelligence review shows.

The Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) said defectors introduced to US intelligence agents by the organisation invented or exaggerated their claims to have personal knowledge of the regime and its alleged weapons of mass destruction. The US paid more than $1m for such information.

In 1998, Congress provided $97m to the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the London-based group that claimed to be an umbrella organisation for Iraqi interests. Its chairman, Mr Chalabi, is president of Iraq's Governing Council.

The defectors were interviewed before the warin various European capitals and the Kurdish-controlled city of Arbil in northern Iraq. Defectors were also made available to newspapers and magazines which reported stories about the cruelty of Saddam's regime and his efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

But the DIA review, mentioned in a leaked letter to Stephen Cambone, the under secretary of defence for intelligence, makes clear that no more than a third of the information was potentially useful, and efforts to explore even these leads were generally unproductive.

Opinion about the INC in the Bush administration was already divided. The Pentagon and those pushing for war against Iraq were quick to cite the information it provided and to promote the cause of Mr Chalabi, but the CIA and the State Department were much more cautious about the organisation's reliability.

"The [INC's] intelligence isn't reliable at all," Vincent Cannistraro, a former senior CIA official and counter-terrorism expert, said before the war. "Much of it is propaganda. Much of it is telling the Defence Department what they want to hear. And much of it is used to support Chalabi's own presidential ambitions. They make no distinction between intelligence and propaganda, using alleged informants and defectors who say what Chalabi wants them to say, [creating] cooked information that goes right into presidential and vice-presidential speeches."

Information provided by Mr Chalabi was used extensively by the administration and US journalists. Surces said The New York Times reporter Judith Miller relied on the INC for many of her stories about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction. Most of the claims in those stories have since proved unfounded but in an e-mail to a colleague she wrote: "I've been covering Chalabi for about 10 years, and have done most of the stories about him for our paper. He has provided most of the front-page exclusives on WMD to our paper."

A DIA spokesman, Ken Gerhart, said yesterday he "would not comment on classified information". Mr Cambone was unavailable for comment.

The INC angrily dismissed the suggestion that its information was of no use. A spokesman, Ahmed al-Chalabi (no relation) said: "That is bullshit. That means there was nothing of use from any of the Iraqi groups because we are an umbrella organisation made up of seven or more groups. Any of the information going to the US was not just from Ahmed Chalabi."

The congressional intelli-gence committee concluded in a recent report that the CIA's information about Iraqi weapons was "outdated, circumstantial and fragmentary".


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1m; chalabi; intelligence; iraq; paid; us
Hey, it's just my money!
1 posted on 09/29/2003 3:06:45 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
It is not the first time. Lesson from 1789 and subsequent, expatriots are delusional. They sit in their parlors and drink one another's bath water.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 3:11:21 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This has been patently obvious since mere days into the ground war back in March.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 3:11:44 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Saddaams gone, you lucky b%stard! The cost was cheap, when you look at the big picture. Ant terrorist bombings lately? ..No, theyre all over in Iraq, living in other people's houses.
4 posted on 09/29/2003 3:13:49 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whispering Smith
Chalabi hadn't been back to Iraq since 1958. Where is his support in the exile community, much less Iraq? Anyone with common sense wouldn't put much faith and expense in that guy, apparently the Pentagon civilian hawks (with their "Don't draft me, I'm in grad school PhDs from the 1960s") fell all over themselves doing just that.
5 posted on 09/29/2003 3:32:28 PM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
I dunno if they exaggerated their knowledge of weapons, but they sure didn't exaggerate their injuries. A lot of them had no trouble showing the scars.

Kelly redux again...the Hutton inqiury is almost wrapped up and the British press needs more dirt. Particularly, any dirt which will somewhat exhonorate the despicable behavior of the BBC and Andrew Gilligan.

6 posted on 09/29/2003 3:34:56 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
He would have been gone without wasting this $1 million.

Kinda reminds me of that BS about the babies being taken out of the incubators in Gulf War 1. How many times are we gonna fall for this?
7 posted on 09/29/2003 3:36:41 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
"no more than a third of the information was potentially useful"

Actually, that sounds like a pretty good percentage to me. If they give you a hundred documents, and 33 prove useful, isn't that a much higher percentage than - say - the number of police tips that end up being useful? When there's a high-profile crime, the police get hundreds of tips that tun out worthless, and if they had a source that gave them useful information one-third of the time, I think they'd be delighted.
8 posted on 09/29/2003 4:05:45 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Notice there is not a single actual quote from this alleged leaked document.
9 posted on 09/29/2003 4:07:21 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
A Fool and his money are soon parted.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 4:07:53 PM PDT by jsbankston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
There is the rest of the sentence:and efforts to explore even these leads were generally unproductive.
11 posted on 09/29/2003 5:39:24 PM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
>>>>>>>>>>The Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) said defectors introduced to US intelligence agents by the organisation invented or exaggerated their claims to have personal knowledge of the regime and its alleged weapons of mass destruction. The US paid more than $1m for such information<<<<<<

U.S. Embassy in Bosnia also paid $1M to support hoax, erection of a monument to honor 7000 murdered Muslims.

The problem? 7000 number was provided by radical Islamists and many of allegedly dead are alive.

Another example of your tax dollars at work. What's a Mil or two among friends.

12 posted on 09/29/2003 5:59:30 PM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson