Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOVAK: 'NOBODY IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION CALLED ME TO LEAK THIS'
Drudge Report ^ | 09/29/03

Posted on 09/29/2003 1:49:52 PM PDT by Pokey78

Edited on 09/29/2003 2:01:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In July I was interviewing a senior administration official on Ambassador Wilson's report when he told the trip was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official told me the same thing. As a professional journalist with 46 years experience in Washington I do not reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA in July to confirm Mrs. Wilson's involvement in the mission for her husband -- he is a former Clitnon administration official -- they asked me not to use her name, but never indicated it would endanger her or anybody else. According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operator, and not in charge of an undercover operatives...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushbashing; cia; josephwilson; lyingliars; mediabias; novak; robertnovak; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-638 next last
To: Pokey78
"According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operator, and not in charge of an undercover operatives..."

If she is an analyst and not a covert operator then it might not be a crime to reveal her identity. This may be much ado about nothing.
21 posted on 09/29/2003 1:57:52 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.asp?ref=/may/may200309291022.asp



September 29, 2003, 10:22 a.m.
Spy Games
Was it really a secret that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA?

It's the top story in the Washington Post this morning as well as in many other media outlets. Who leaked the fact that the wife of Joseph C. Wilson IV worked for the CIA?

What also might be worth asking: "Who didn't know?"

I believe I was the first to publicly question the credibility of Mr. Wilson, a retired diplomat sent to Niger to look into reports that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase yellowcake uranium for his nuclear-weapons program.

On July 6, Mr. Wilson wrote an op-ed for the New York Times in which he said: "I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

On July 11, I wrote a piece for NRO arguing that Mr. Wilson had no basis for that conclusion — and that his political leanings and associations (not disclosed by the Times and others journalists interviewing him) cast serious doubt on his objectivity.

On July 14, Robert Novak wrote a column in the Post and other newspapers naming Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative.

That wasn't news to me. I had been told that — but not by anyone working in the White House. Rather, I learned it from someone who formerly worked in the government and he mentioned it in an offhand manner, leading me to infer it was something that insiders were well aware of.

I chose not to include it (I wrote a second NRO piece on this issue on July 18) because it didn't seem particularly relevant to the question of whether or not Mr. Wilson should be regarded as a disinterested professional who had done a thorough investigation into Saddam's alleged attempts to purchase uranium in Africa.

What did appear relevant could easily be found in what the CIA would call "open sources." For example, Mr. Wilson had long been a bitter critic of the current administration, writing in such left-wing publications as The Nation that under President Bush, "America has entered one of it periods of historical madness" and had "imperial ambitions."

What's more, he was affiliated with the pro-Saudi Middle East Institute and he had recently been the keynote speaker for the Education for Peace in Iraq Center, a far-Left group that opposed not only the U.S. military intervention in Iraq but also the sanctions and the no-fly zones that protected Iraqi Kurds and Shias from being slaughtered by Saddam.

Mr. Wilson is now saying (on C-SPAN this morning, for example) that he opposed military action in Iraq because he didn't believe Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and he foresaw the possibility of a difficult occupation. In fact, prior to the U.S. invasion, Mr. Wilson told ABC's Dave Marash that if American troops were sent into Iraq, Saddam might "use a biological weapon in a battle that we might have. For example, if we're taking Baghdad or we're trying to take, in ground-to-ground, hand-to-hand combat."

Equally, important and also overlooked: Mr. Wilson had no apparent background or skill as an investigator. As Mr. Wilson himself acknowledged, his so-called investigation was nothing more than "eight days drinking sweet mint tea and meeting with dozens of people" at the U.S. embassy in Niger. Based on those conversations, he concluded that "it was highly doubtful that any [sale of uranium from Niger to Iraq] had ever taken place."

That's hardly the same as disproving what British intelligence believed — and continues to believe: that Saddam Hussein was actively attempting to purchase uranium from somewhere in Africa. (Whether Saddam succeeded or not isn't the point; were Saddam attempting to make such purchases it would suggest that his nuclear-weapons-development program was active and ongoing.)

For some reason, this background and these questions have been consistently omitted in the Establishment media's reporting on Mr. Wilson and his charges.

There also remains this intriguing question: Was it primarily due to the fact that Mr. Wilson's wife worked for the CIA that he received the Niger assignment?

Mr. Wilson has said that his mission came about following a request from Vice President Cheney. But it appears that if Mr. Cheney made the request at all, he made it of the CIA and did not know Mr. Wilson and certainly did not specify that he wanted Mr. Wilson put on the case.

It has to be seen as puzzling that the agency would deal with an inquiry from the White House on a sensitive national-security matter by sending a retired, Bush-bashing diplomat with no investigative experience. Or didn't the CIA bother to look into Mr. Wilson's background?

If that's what passes for tradecraft in Langley, we're in more trouble than any of us have realized.

— Clifford D. May, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, is president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism.
23 posted on 09/29/2003 1:58:49 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
BTTT
24 posted on 09/29/2003 1:59:01 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I love watching the democrats fall all to pieces....
25 posted on 09/29/2003 1:59:38 PM PDT by b4its2late (Give me ambiguity or give me something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Schumer did call for an independent prosecutor today. It was just not carried - at least by Fox. Perhaps he just made the statement, as Kerry did. Fox did report that Schumer made the call for the independent prosecutor, however.
26 posted on 09/29/2003 1:59:57 PM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Wilson insisted, however, "I have great confidence that, at a minimum, [Rove] condoned it and certainly did nothing to shut it down.""

Funny how Wilson criticizes the minimal evidence behind Bush’s claim while making up stuff with zero evidence for his own.

27 posted on 09/29/2003 1:59:57 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
We were speculating on another thread that she was NOT an operative but rather an analyst and we don't think it's a federal crime to reveal analyst's names, although it seems exceedingly unwise.
28 posted on 09/29/2003 2:00:09 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
You may laugh about it being a Clinton holdover but I think Clinton holdovers are GWs biggest weakness!
29 posted on 09/29/2003 2:00:30 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
This statement could read as if Wilson told Novak his wife was a CIA agent. And the Admin. confirmed.

Hence, Wilson was the leaker. His Karl Rove statement was made out of fear of his own exposure. Probably denied to wife he ever said it.

Still, Novak's language is stilted.

30 posted on 09/29/2003 2:00:55 PM PDT by Shermy (Show us the Maryland pond "glove box"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Peach
So this is why Schumer called off his press conference. hahahah

Did he call it off

I thought he had it

31 posted on 09/29/2003 2:01:01 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I can't say it's true, but it is consistant. He never said that two administration officials told him that Valerie was in the CIA. He said that they told him that she recommended her husband for the Niger (apparently pronounced "nee-shaire") job.

VDD (very desperate democrats)
32 posted on 09/29/2003 2:01:04 PM PDT by Soliton (Alone with everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
"MUAHAHAHAHAHA!! The main story for the evening news just got BLOWN!"

They will still run with it, they just won't mention this. You're giving them to much credit with being honest.

33 posted on 09/29/2003 2:01:13 PM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
News at the top of the hour are still sticking with the leaking to Novak story......
34 posted on 09/29/2003 2:01:47 PM PDT by b4its2late (Give me ambiguity or give me something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I'm not a 24/7 subscriber, but I listen to Rush nearly everyday via Chicago's WLS radio website: www.wlsam.com. They have a listen live option.
35 posted on 09/29/2003 2:02:36 PM PDT by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Teeney Tommy is sad.

Ketchup Kerry has a long face.

Chuck's a schmuck and...

Hitlery is doing her "off with their heads" routine.

It's a great day!!

36 posted on 09/29/2003 2:03:10 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah
I think Clinton holdovers are GWs biggest weakness!

Agreed. And we thought Clinton was a bad man when he fired all of Bush 41's AG's......

37 posted on 09/29/2003 2:03:13 PM PDT by b4its2late (Give me ambiguity or give me something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I mis-typed! I don't know that Schumer called it off - it's an assumption since it wasn't carried.

I rather think had he actually held his press conference, the liberal press, in all their glee, would have happily given up valuable ad/soap operate time to cover it.

Rush indicated there were big surprises ahead; I'm wondering if this is one of them. He said he knew something he wasn't at liberty to discuss.
38 posted on 09/29/2003 2:03:24 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: facedown
DU'ers are going Chernobyl over this.
39 posted on 09/29/2003 2:03:54 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Peach
But we are still left with the fact that Mr. Wilson revealed to the media the substance of his report to Mr. Bush, which report must have been classified.

Perhaps Mr. Wilson was simply using a good offense as a defense.

40 posted on 09/29/2003 2:03:57 PM PDT by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-638 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson