Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prelude to a Political Obit: McClintock's Tragic Flaw
NewsMax ^ | 9/29/03 | Geoff Metcalf

Posted on 09/29/2003 12:34:37 PM PDT by finnman69

I’ve known California State Sen. Tom McClintock since I first moved to California in 1981. I have considered him a friend since 1992 and have spoken at fund raisers for him.

Tom is a for-real Jeffersonian constitutional conservative. I have sat in his offices many times, had him as a guest on my various radio programs, and socialized with him and his wonderful family.

The blessing and curse of Tom McClintock is his rock solid adherence to his principles. Unlike most politicians he does not lie, dissemble, compromise or weasel. However, those very characteristics I admire in him as a man, husband and father remain his tragic flaw as a politician.

Tom has a responsibility to his principles, his family, his party and the state of California. His stubbornness and ego are going to have dire consequences. The McClintock recalcitrance has exceeded the point of diminishing return. Ego and myopia reveal his hubris, which has overshadowed his intellect.

Tom cannot win. Virtually every 'real' poll demonstrates that his support remains solid but static. The push poll 'strokes' he has been fed are flawed samples, and he should know that.

I honestly feel he is being ill served by his closest and most loyal inner circle, which are contributing to the political and professional demise of a good man they claim to love.

However, as a leader Tom is ultimately responsible for "the welfare, discipline and tactical deployment of his troops" and must bear blame for mistakes. And refusing to join the groundswell of support for Arnold IS an epic mistake.

The most recent Democrat poll I have seen indicates that Schwarzenegger can win (even with McClintock on the ticket). However, the margin is CLOSE (within the statistical variance of 'accuracy'). In other words, it is a dead heat between Arnold and Cruz Bustamante.

IF McClintock really cared about fixing the tragic problems he says are imperative, he would join Bill Simon, Darryl Issa, Peter Ueberroth and the county Republican chairs and, for the good of the state, the party, his political viability AND his family, support the one man who CAN win.

His stubborn refusal to recognize reality is a personal and professional failure of epic proportion.

I have always considered Tom a smart guy. His is principled, black and white, consistent and stubborn. However, his blind conceit will result in consequences that I fear the state and Tom McClintock cannot survive.

McClintock has a unique opportunity he has never enjoyed (and never will again) politically. His inability to recognize the extraordinary opportunity he is squandering is a great sadness.

Tom has always enjoyed solid grassroots support from core conservatives. However, he has never been able to gain traction in any of his statewide campaigns (despite an 'almost' in his last Controllers race). His failures have resulted because of his inability to reach out beyond his core, and an inability to raise money at a competitive level.

Contributing to his difficulties has been a personal proclivity for (as one of his closest aids has acknowledged) "whizzing in everyone’s breakfast cereal."

Politics IS the art of compromise. Compromise is anathema to McClintock ... which arguably fatally handicaps him as a politician.

It is significant to note that Darryl Issa (the guy who spent over $1.6 million of his own money to empower the recall effort) recognizes the necessity of electing Schwarzenegger. However, Tom McClintock is too blinded to recognize that $2 million from the Indian gaming interests was NOT an endorsement of McClintock but an effort to help 'their' guy, Bustamante.

Tom has acquitted himself very well on what has become the national stage. People who never heard of him now recognize his knowledge, intellect and commitment. However, some of the very important national figures who were anxious to embrace and help McClintock are about a heartbeat from orchestrating his political destruction.

IF (and it is an improbable huge flipping 'if') McClintock were to throw his support to Arnold, he would be a Republican (and eventually state) hero.

He could claim bragging rights, and political coinage, for securing the election of Arnold.

IF he allowed himself to become king maker he almost certainly would enjoy a significant role in the new administration, and his talents and abilities could and would benefit the new administration and the state.

IF his ego results in a Republican loss and the ascendance of Cruz Bustamante, Tom McClintock will become a radioactive pariah.

As Edward Albee once wrote, "... what is gained is loss." Right is not always Might.

It has always been fascinating that smart people can do incredibly stupid things. There is a long list of 'smart' people doing dumb things: Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, Wesley Clark, and yeah ... unfortunately, Tom McClintock.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: egomania; geoffmetcalf; mcclintock; recall; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2003 12:34:37 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: finnman69
If McClintock is going to drop out, now is not the time to do it. He can use whatever contributions he has gathered to attack Bustemonte and Davis and leave Schwarzenegger alone. Why? Because the Democrats are not done attacking Arnold. Expect some juicy revelations about 3-5 days out. If these revelations happen and wound Schwarzenegger, then McClintock provides another place for people to go. If nothing happens within about 3 days of the election, Arnold is still polling strong, and he is sure he can't win, then he should simply push his support behind Arnold but still not full drop out, just in case.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 12:43:06 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69; Robert_Paulson2; Chancellor Palpatine; EggsAckley
Thanks for posting this.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 12:44:05 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I hope he reads this and drops out, as the fate of California is in his hands. Sadly, every vote for him is a vote for Cruz Bustamente.
4 posted on 09/29/2003 12:44:47 PM PDT by Steely Glint ("Communists are just Democrats in a big hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
You assume the RATS have something on Arnold. Davis is a dead duck and he knows it. That's why he wants a debate with Arnold now.
5 posted on 09/29/2003 12:45:13 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Even if he drops out and endorses Arnold, do all of his Absentee Ballouts help Bustamente or Davis?
6 posted on 09/29/2003 12:47:15 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Ballouts = ballots (I think)
7 posted on 09/29/2003 12:47:54 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Question_Assumptions
If these revelations happen it is even more important that Mcc is completely out of the race so as to not split the vote and hand the win over to davis-clinton-bustamovemante.

If these revelations happen and Mcc is still in the race, it will be an almost guaranteed win for Busty.
9 posted on 09/29/2003 12:51:04 PM PDT by GROOVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Get your flameproof suit ready, friend. Incoming.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 12:51:06 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Please apply everything in this article to Rush Limbaugh. Even today, he was reassuring a liberal caller that he (Rush) is not in with the "support Arnold to win" crowd. He is a man of conservative principle. Rush has decided not just to go down with the ship, but to help Mclintock sink the ship. He deserves just as much rebuke as Mclintock.
11 posted on 09/29/2003 12:52:41 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I have considered him a friend since 1992...

and then this?

..his blind conceit.. failures have resulted because of his inability to reach out beyond his core..contributing to his difficulties has been a personal proclivity for (as one of his closest aids has acknowledged) 'whizzing in everyone’s breakfast cereal'.. Politics IS the art of compromise. Compromise is anathema to McClintock ... which arguably fatally handicaps him as a politician.

WoW! What a f-r-i-e-n-d. As a friend, this guy is willing to publically trash McClintock. All McClintock has to do to be a "good guy" is compromise most of the principles he stands for, throw in the towel for a RINO without ANY compromise from the RINO in advance, and in fact, without much courtesy from the RINO GOPers at all.

Hey RINO's. PLEASE, PLEASE, please, be someone else's "friend". In God we trust, but all others, and especially RINOs, we want to see advance payment. You don't extend credit to deadbeats, and you certainly don't to deadbeats who slap you in the face.

The RINO's keep trying to rewrite the history of California politics. It's the "right wing", the "radical" conservatives who have ruined the state GOP. I've heard that crap since I was on the San Diego County Central Committee, when they were using every trick in the book to block pro-life conservatives from being elected to CC seats.

If RINO's use the Clinton-Davis demogog playbook, don't be surprised if California conservatives are too sick to their stomach on election day to get out to vote.

I might vote for Arnold. My wife (a naturalized citizen from a "racial minority") almost certainly won't. If Arnold loses, it'll be HIS EGO, and the ongoing and continuing conceit of the GOP RINO establishment that loses the election, not the GOP conservatives.

SFS

12 posted on 09/29/2003 12:53:23 PM PDT by Steel and Fire and Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Perhaps he sees value in being able to later say; "see, I told you so" to the state's Republicans when Governor Arnold disappoints.

13 posted on 09/29/2003 12:54:39 PM PDT by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Get your flameproof suit ready, friend. Incoming.

Always like to oblidge a fellow FReeper!

FReegards .. SFS

14 posted on 09/29/2003 12:55:07 PM PDT by Steel and Fire and Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
It appears Geoff Metcalf has double standards for what it takes to be a moral, successful politician.

Just a simple observation. The latest USA Today poll suggests McClintock would win if Arnold were not in it. So the argument that a conservative can't win is specious and flat out wrong.

15 posted on 09/29/2003 12:55:21 PM PDT by outlawcam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel and Fire and Stone
Don't be too hard on ol' Geoff Metcalf. Except for his WND column he's currently unemployed and is looking to ride the Arnold bandwagon to a new radio talk show gig.
16 posted on 09/29/2003 1:00:20 PM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: finnman69
Tom McClintock is too blinded to recognize that $2 million from the Indian gaming interests was NOT an endorsement of McClintock but an effort to help 'their' guy, Bustamante.

This fact alone more or less sums up McClintock's Achilles' heel. Even a man of strong principles is flawed in some area of his life.

It would appear that Tom's ego makes him vulnerable and too easily fooled.

It's disturbing to see "Paid for by the Morongo Indian Tribe" flash across his TV ad. It is fair to say that anyone who thinks the tribes want McClintock elected is either duped, foolish, or both.

18 posted on 09/29/2003 1:04:26 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabid Republican
This post is a good example of fuzzy thinking that insures that California will continue to allow the minority govern the majority.

Good ol' plurality vote election laws! It is small wonder that so many voters choose not to bother to vote!

This California election is a wake-up call to the futility of trying to allow the voters to choose the best candidate, instead of the candidate who that might "win."

CEO Gray-Davis "won" in the last election, because the best candidates "dropped out for the good of the Party." What use is a system that is good for the Political Party, but bad for the State of California?

In this election, as in the last election, voters are asked to vote for tweedle-dumb or tweedle-dumber under the plurality vote election laws.

Democracy could be introduced into the California political system if the voters would see to it that the plurality election laws were replaced by the majority election laws. That is, a majority is 50 percent of those voting, plus one or more votes.

If these changes are not made in the next three years (by the next election after this one), then the voters of California will have chosen to keep on allowing the minority to govern the majority.

Plurality will always win over Democracy as long as the voters allow plurality to be legal. If plurality election laws remain in force in California, then it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people.
19 posted on 09/29/2003 1:06:28 PM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; onyx; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; redlipstick; habs4ever; My2Cents; South40; ...
Ping.
20 posted on 09/29/2003 1:06:53 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson