Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate 2004 Outlook. GOP recruitment problems dim hopes.
NRO ^ | September 29, 2003, 8:16 a.m. | John J. Miller

Posted on 09/29/2003 10:57:17 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

People like to say that political campaigns don't begin until after Labor Day. Well, didn't we just have one? Granted, there's still one more to go before next year's Senate elections, but who's counting? Here's the latest on the 2004 races, updated from my report in July.

The major development since then has been the GOP's failure to recruit its best candidates for races in Arkansas and Nevada — states where Republicans might have had a good chance at victory, but now probably don't have much chance at all. This has lifted Democratic morale significantly and may even affect the retirement decisions of a few key incumbents.

A quick recap of the big picture: Republicans currently hold a 51-seat majority. There will be 34 Senate elections next year for seats now held by 19 Democrats and 15 Republicans. Of these, I've used a pretty generous standard of competitiveness to determine that 17 of these races are possibly up for grabs. A dozen Democrats and 5 Republicans now occupy these seats. Most of these contests will become much less competitive over time. Still, I'm in an extra-generous mood, so I'm going to expand the list by one to include Colorado, for reasons described below.

And now, the state-by-state outlook:

ALASKA: Sen. Lisa Murkowski remains the GOP's most vulnerable incumbent, though Republicans are a bit more hopeful about her chances now than they were a few months ago. She's scaring off primary challengers, though it's still possible she'll face a pro-lifer who could cause some damage. Former Gov. Tony Knowles, a Democrat, will be a tough opponent in November, though it's worth noting that his two gubernatorial victories came in non-presidential-election years. That won't be true in 2004, when Bush's spot at the top of the ticket should boost Murkowski in this GOP-friendly state.

ARKANSAS: Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln would have had a tough reelection if either Gov. Mike Huckabee or former Rep. Asa Hutchison had decided to challenge her. Both demurred. Lincoln now must be considered a clear favorite for a second term.

CALIFORNIA: Everything's on hold until after the recall election. As far as the Senate goes, Republican interests probably would have been best served without there being a recall election in the first place. This would have given next year's nominee the useful ability to link Sen. Barbara Boxer to fellow Democrat Gray Davis. Now, however, either Davis will get a boost from beating the recall or he'll be gone. It's possible that a disastrous Bustamante administration might serve as a replacement boogeyman. In the meantime, it's totally unclear who the GOP nominee will be. My guess is that Boxer will coast to reelection, though this may become a race to watch if an outstanding Republican candidate emerges. If Tom McClintock drops out of the recall race and endorses Arnold Schwarzenegger — an increasingly unlikely prospect — keep an eye on him for the Senate contest.

COLORADO: There's probably only one Democrat in the state who has a chance of beating Republican Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell, and that's Rep. Mark Udall. Earlier this year, it didn't look like Udall was going to get in. Now he says he hasn't made up his mind and will do so this fall. A recent poll had Campbell running well ahead of both Udall and former Sen. Gary Hart, who has hinted that he might run (but also has said he would get out of Udall's way). Campbell would be the favorite in any race, but only Udall's absence will give him a solid lock on a new term.

FLORIDA: Bob Graham's campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination hasn't taken off — he's not even a top-five candidate. This may compel him to drop out and announce he's running for reelection: Florida is one of those states where he must eventually make a choice about doing one or the other. If he quits the Senate, however, the Democrats will pick between Rep. Peter Deutsch, who has raised more than $3 million, and Miami-Dade mayor Alex Penelas. The GOP field is crowded, even though Rep. Mark Foley recently dropped out.

GEORGIA: Almost certainly a GOP pick-up here, as businessman Herman Cain, Rep. Mac Collins, and Rep. Johnny Isakson duke it out for a Republican nomination that practically will coronate retiring Democrat Zell Miller's successor. The well-funded Isakson is the frontrunner, but he suffers from a history of statewide election flops and a voting record that isn't 100 percent pro-life.

ILLINOIS: This open seat, now held by retiring Republican Peter Fitzgerald, is the Democrats' Georgia — their best 2004 pick-up opportunity. It's also another example of Republican recruitment problems. The GOP's best candidate, former Gov. Jim Edgar, has said he won't run. As of now, the smart money seems to be on Democratic comptroller Dan Hynes becoming the state's next senator, though there are lots of candidates on both sides and anything could happen.

LOUISIANA: Democratic Sen. John Breaux says he'll make a decision about reelection after this year's governor's race. This has fueled speculation that if Democrat Richard Ieyoub wins in November, Breaux will step down and let Ieyoub appoint Rep. Chris John to fill the vacancy. This would give John a small boost against his likely GOP opponent, Rep. David Vitter, in what would be a tight race. If Breaux runs again, though, he's a shoe-in.

MISSOURI: GOP Senator Kit Bond remains a strong candidate for reelection, but Democrats insist they have a chance here. It is an exceedingly small chance.

NEVADA: Democratic Sen. Harry Reid surely breathed a big sigh of relief when Rep. Jim Gibbons decided not to run against him: Instantly, Reid went from being his party's most vulnerable incumbent to an almost sure bet on winning a return ticket to Washington.

NORTH CAROLINA: The decision by Democratic Sen. John Edwards not run for reelection (and instead pursue his presidential ambitions) probably improves GOP chances here, albeit slightly. Incumbents always have intangible advantages, even when they aren't hugely popular. But the Democrats also have a good candidate in President Clinton's former chief of staff, Erskine Bowles. This looks like a close race between Bowles and GOP Rep. Richard Burr: A Raleigh News and Observer poll released last week had Burr leading, 43 percent to 37 percent.

NORTH DAKOTA: Here's another state with GOP recruitment problems, even though Bush ran 25 points ahead of the Gore-Nader bloc in 2000. Earlier this year, the best Republican candidate, former governor Ed Schaeffer, said no to a race. Last month, Dale Brown, a popular basketball coach, said he's skipping, too. That leaves Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan wondering who his opponent will be — and no doubt thinking he'll get another six years in the capitol. He's probably right.

OKLAHOMA: Republican Sen. Don Nickles says that in November or December he'll let us know about running again. If he quits, this could become a very competitive contest, with Democratic Rep. Brad Carson already positioning himself for an open-seat race. On the GOP side, Rep. Ernest Istook and Oklahoma City mayor Kirk Humphreys will square off for the nomination. It would be worth keeping an eye on J. C. Watts, too.

PENNSYLVANIA: All the interest here, so far, has been on Rep. Pat Toomey's primary challenge to Arlen Specter, who was recently dubbed "The Worst Republican Senator" by a leading magazine (order an online subscription here). Both candidates have agreed not to air ads between now and November, so that a united GOP can focus on a few local elections. That means you'll have to wait for a Toomey piece on former Clinton deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes recently sending a $1,000 check to Specter. The incumbent must be considered the favorite, but Toomey offers an appealing alternative for conservatives tired of Specter's liberalism. For the Democrats, Rep. Joe Hoeffel has a small chance against Specter and a better one against Toomey.

SOUTH CAROLINA: First elected to the Senate in 1966, Democrat Ernest Hollings had to wait until earlier this year for Strom Thurmond to retire and become his state's senior senator. Now he's getting out, too. After Georgia, this is the GOP's best pick-up hope. The Republican primary will come down to former attorney general Charlie Condon and Rep. Jim DeMint.

SOUTH DAKOTA: It looks like former GOP Rep. John Thune, who nearly unseated Sen. Tim Johnson last year, will take on Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle. A recent Sioux Falls Argus Leader poll had the incumbent slightly ahead of Thune, 48 percent to 46 percent. Daschle is definitely looking over his shoulder — last week he signed on to a bill pushed by the National Rifle Association.

WASHINGTON: The GOP's first choice to take on Sen. Patty Murray was Rep. Jennifer Dunn, but she declined to run. Now it's up to Rep. George Nethercutt. Murray is one of those unimpressive politicians who looks eminently beatable but somehow manages to keep on winning. Nethercutt will give her a tough time. Just remember that she's a survivor and the Seattle market is terra incognita for him.

WISCONSIN: Former Gov. Tommy Thompson (now head of HHS) says that state senator Bob Welch has the best chance of winning the GOP primary, whose contestants also include businessman Tim Michels and auto dealer Russ Darrow. Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold will be a strong favorite against any of them — especially Darrow, who has written checks to the senator in the past.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; electionsenate; selftermination; uughhhhh
The GOP is like a football team that fumbles every time it gets in the opposition's Red Zone. Hillary Clinton is a woman truely blessed by her enemies....
1 posted on 09/29/2003 10:57:18 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Our mistakes would be fatal, were it not for all the mistakes made by the other team.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 10:59:24 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
They were saying the same thing in 2002, when John Engler, and Marc Racicot refused to run for Senate.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 11:02:02 AM PDT by Pubbie ("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
CALIFORNIA: http://www.strickland4senate.com/
4 posted on 09/29/2003 11:06:27 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Good point. I remember the angst over Engel not running in particular. Who do you think they should get on the ticket in Nevada or N. Dakota?
5 posted on 09/29/2003 11:09:30 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (redruM's Advice -- NEVER steal the ID of a registered sex offender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Strickland could very well nail down the nomination early. He needs two endorsements to go after Biohazard Boxer properly armed. One from Tom McClintock to hammer down the base, and one from Ahnuld to reach out for the middle.
6 posted on 09/29/2003 11:11:36 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (redruM's Advice -- NEVER steal the ID of a registered sex offender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Well, in Nevada, there are two candidates Wealthy Las Vegas Realtor Jack Woodcock who has said he is ready to spend 250,000 dollars just to get his campaign started, and Secretary of state Dean Heller.

Of the two, Woodcock is the person most interested in running against Reid.

In North Dakota our last hope is if Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem runs against Dorgan.

No word on what the AG is going to do, though he hasn't said no yet, so that means he's probably thinking about it.
7 posted on 09/29/2003 11:14:16 AM PDT by Pubbie ("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I have been following most of these races fairly closely. I think Georgia, and South Carolina are by far the best chances for GOP (real conservatives) pickups. North Carolina will be a close race, but I'd give the edge to Burr (GOP) over Bowles. Republican incumbets shall do well but will surely lose the Illinois seat. If Breaux drops out in La I think GOP would have a good shot there. Democratic incumbets (NV, WA, FL, (if graham runs) WI, CA) will also win. We had a shot at picking Reid off in Nevada and Lincoln in Arkansas but nobody exciting stepped up.

Final outcome: +2 or 3 for GOP in the Senate.
8 posted on 09/29/2003 11:17:11 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Pro Life! Pro Family! Pro Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I'm a little confused on one thing: Didn't Asia Hutchinson say he would run if Bush asked him? Can't Bush just lean on him a little? I think that would turn Ark. into a strong pickup chance.

Beyond that, I think this is a little too gloom and doom. We are all but assured 2 pickups, in Georgia and South Carolina, and that means that the dems would have to beat two of our incumbent just to break even, and I'm not convinced they have odds better then 50/50 even in Ill. and I don't think they have a prayer in Alaska, even though this article seems to think so. I also think we have very strong pickup chances in North Carolina and South Dakota, and assuming we can find a even mildly respectable candidate, North Dakota. I just don't see how some State Rep or something couldn't have at least a decent chance when Bush is gonna win the state with 60+% of the vote.

Unfortunately, I think they are probably right about Wa. (my home state) Patty Murray should have been a political corpse a long time ago, but somehow she isn't. The Osama comment might bring her down, but I'm not holding my breath. George Nethercutt is a great guy, but he's from the other side of the mountains, which is basically another state.
9 posted on 09/29/2003 11:20:12 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Engler would have lost that one. Carl Levin is as much a Michigan instiution as GM by now, and people were burned out on Engler after his 12 years of ruling Lansing with an iron fist.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 11:48:20 AM PDT by TedsGarage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Engler would have lost that one. Carl Levin is as much a Michigan instiution as GM by now, and people were burned out on Engler after his 12 years of ruling Lansing with an iron fist.
11 posted on 09/29/2003 11:48:24 AM PDT by TedsGarage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
They were saying the same thing in 2002, when John Engler, and Marc Racicot refused to run for Senate.
Yes and as you recall, we lost both Michigan and Montana.
The poster who mention that Hutchinson would run if Bush asked is right. Bush will lean on some people this fall and more of these openings will be filled.

12 posted on 09/29/2003 11:56:05 AM PDT by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz
George Nethercutt is a great guy, but he's from the other side of the mountains, which is basically another state.

And he defeated a sitting Speaker of the House - Tom Foley. So while this is now a statewide race, don't underestimate him.

13 posted on 09/29/2003 11:56:23 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Well aware, but he did that in 94, when the Republicans couldn't do any wrong.

Don't get me wrong, I've never said he couldn't win, I'm just saying the odds are against him. I'd give him a 40% chance at best.

14 posted on 09/29/2003 12:02:29 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: azcap
"Yes and as you recall, we lost both Michigan and Montana."

Yes but people also said Chambliss didn't have a prayer against Cleland and how Talent wouldn't beat Carnahan because of the sympathy vote for her dead husband.

"The poster who mention that Hutchinson would run if Bush asked is right."

Win Rockefeller is considering running against Lincoln (Both Asa Hutchinson and Huckabee are purportedly trying to get him to run).

"Bush will lean on some people this fall and more of these openings will be filled."

Hope he gets some success.
15 posted on 09/29/2003 12:02:59 PM PDT by Pubbie ("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
And to make up for Montana the Dems were kind enough to not have Gov. Kitzhaber run against Gordon Smith in Oregon. Gordon went from very vulnerable to quite safe thanks to that.
16 posted on 09/29/2003 12:13:35 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Send me an e-mail as soon as you hear what the AG is doing.
17 posted on 09/29/2003 2:39:37 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: republicanwizard
Ok.
18 posted on 09/29/2003 3:00:50 PM PDT by Pubbie ("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Go Pat Toomey.

www.pattoomey.org

19 posted on 09/29/2003 8:56:12 PM PDT by GeneralHavoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson