Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside McClintock’s Head - What Could Have Been
National Review ^ | September 29, 2003 | Arnold Steinberg

Posted on 09/29/2003 9:06:32 AM PDT by Recourse

September 29, 2003, 10:07 a.m.

Inside McClintock’s Head What could have been.

By Arnold Steinberg

LOS ANGELES — Republican candidate for California governor Tom McClintock is honorable and principled, intelligent and serious. He can be plainspoken in his eloquence. Now, with the election barely a week away, some may ask plainly: Why is he still running?

McClintock's critics say he is not a team player. But McClintock supporters reply that the Republican team was AWOL last year. That's when McClintock barely lost in the state controller's race to a Democrat who outspent him 5-to-1. Republican kingmakers, according to McClintock partisans, instead funded likely losers.

Was it a chicken-and-egg situation? McClintock is more solitary than collegial. As politicians go, he is a loner. For many conservatives, he is right on the issues. But he also is not a coalition builder, even in his own party. To be more precise, early last decade, McClintock opposed then-Gov. Pete Wilson's tax hike. And neither Wilson nor McClintock have forgiven each other. McClintock acted the role of spoiler last week, when he attacked Wilson as "California's worst governor."

Given McClintock's mastery of the state's budgetary process, this election, at the outset, was his time. But was it? As soon as Arnold Schwarzenegger announced, Republican Congressman David Dreier began to lead a growing coalition of relatively conservative defectors. Were they pragmatic or prescient — or sellouts?

Was McClintock done in by his fellow travelers? Barely a third into this brief campaign, conservative talk-show hosts tilted Schwarzenegger. There were the obligatory kind words for McClintock. But with friends like Sean Hannity...

McClintock became increasingly impatient with talk-show types repeatedly asking when he would quit the race. But didn't McClintock's campaign encourage such questions by its passive retreat? McClintock did not publicly challenge the vulnerable Schwarzenegger on his inconsistencies and flip-flops.

Conservative icon Bruce Herschensohn now has an independent-expenditure radio spot for McClintock. It's funded modestly by the California Republican Assembly (CRA). In it, Herschensohn says that McClintock would be elected, if only true believers voted their conscience. That message comes too late.

McClintock's critics feel he wants revenge on "country-club Republicans." While McClintock is more comfortable with fiscal issues, he sees the Republican party as more than bookkeepers. But even on tax-and-spend matters, he often has differed with major corporations. There is a populist bent to McClintock. That may be another reason why the California Chamber of Commerce took sides, standing with Arnold.

But would McClintock knowingly sabotage the stronger Republican candidate, Arnold Schwarzenegger? This theory supposed that McClintock would draw enough Republican votes so that Democrat Cruz Bustamante would win. After all this recall fuss, we would end up, if that were possible, with someone worse than Davis. And Davis indeed may be California's worst governor.

But, if Gray Davis is recalled, Schwarzenegger could win, even with McClintock in the race. Arnold seemingly maneuvered McClintock to quit; consequently, he looked less like a leader. In private polling, Arnold currently runs about seven points ahead of Bustamante. Democrat strategists have all but given up on the Cruzer. Their only hope is to defeat the recall. They want a final week of epic negativism, sufficient to drive risk-averse voters back to the devil they know. But they should have opened up on Arnold much earlier.

The simple explanation for Arnold's current lead is not Arnold and his campaign. Despite his near-total name recognition, overwhelming media coverage, and massive ad campaign, Schwarzenegger had stalled until the last few days. But Schwarzenegger has lucked out on many counts, including the failure of Democrats to define him early. Also, Cruz Bustamante's inept campaign has focused solely on nonwhite Democrats. His TV commercials show reaction shots only of ethnics. Not very smart, when the governor just signed controversial legislation giving driver's licenses to illegal aliens. And Bustamante's profound campaign theme runs something like this, "I know it will be hard to find my name on the ballot."

And, ironically, Tom McClintock's campaign has pretty much let Arnold off the hook. Schwarzenegger's high profile was an early gift to McClintock, but his campaign didn't know what to do. If the state senator had confronted Arnold daily, a dozen cameras would have covered him. Here was the perfect storm for an indigent candidate like McClintock who could barely afford paid media: unlimited free media.

Perhaps the turning point was the Great Debate last week. This was McClintock's final opportunity to turn the corner. For reasons that only he knows, Tom McClintock did not engage Arnold Schwarzenegger.

— Arnold Steinberg is a California-based political strategist.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock; mcwampum; recall; schwarzenegger; shitforbrains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Spiff
There is no slime on Arnold, the LA Times emptied all their barrels this weekend-nothing there
21 posted on 09/29/2003 9:51:45 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recourse; Tamsey; BibChr; onyx; redlipstick
"and a ne'er-do-well "

Yeah, a quarter of a billion of ne'er-do-well. Golly, what does one have to do to be considered a success? Lose 2 state wide campaigns?

22 posted on 09/29/2003 9:52:29 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Martyrdom is the aim of true believers,Eggs.He can now hit the Denny's lecture circuit, known as the Blue Plate Special, and intone and drone and groan about how close he came to being a somebody ;-)
23 posted on 09/29/2003 9:52:29 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recourse
Yeah, McClintock needs to lie, stick his finger in the wind to see where the political winds are blowing, say anything to get elected, co-opt socialist ideas and positions, and become a RINO.

No wonder the Republican Party is often referred to as the "Stupid Party." Here's a man with principles and the guts to say what he believes in, and yet two-thirds of the FReepers here continue their love-a-thon with Schwarzenegger.

You don't see DemocRats softening their positions, trying to build coalitions, or become more "moderate" or "inclusive." How many DemocRats are pro-life? How many, except for John Dingell of Michigan, are defenders of the 2nd Amendment? How many Democrats are willing to make concessions if they run in a conservative district?

People have become totally star-struck by a malcontent celebrity and are unable to make the right decision themselves.

24 posted on 09/29/2003 9:55:16 AM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
"For reasons that only he knows, Tom McClintock did not engage Arnold Schwarzenegger. "
25 posted on 09/29/2003 9:55:17 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert... the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
IMHO, Tom is a good guy with good ideas. He is just unlikeable. I can't put my finger on it, but he comes off as holier-than-thou and most people don't like that.

Sweeping generalization. After last week's debate my parents, both AS supporters, had the exact opposite reaction. Don't know if he'll get their vote, but they were much impressed with how he came across.

26 posted on 09/29/2003 9:55:38 AM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
"Martyrdom is the aim of true believers"


"electibility is the death of principle" to them.
27 posted on 09/29/2003 9:56:10 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert... the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Recourse
For reasons that only he knows, Tom McClintock did not engage Arnold Schwarzenegger.

That was because pansy assed intellectual mouths never take on a man of personality, confidence and physical stature when they're sitting right next to one another.

28 posted on 09/29/2003 9:56:54 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Buddy Rydell from "Anger Management" is my new role model)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
" I couda bin a contenda! "
29 posted on 09/29/2003 9:56:56 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert... the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Supporting McClintock gets us into another 1992 Perot situation which saw Bill Clinton elected, you cannot argue that now..
30 posted on 09/29/2003 9:58:05 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
my what a hate filled name caller you are... such a beacon for the "join Arnold" team...

maybe you should look closer at where the ties to the National Socialist Party is, and as a clue to the obtuse,
it's not Tom's corner!

maybe you should go back to bed and get up on the other side to improve your day, Mr. Nice, hmmmmmmm?
31 posted on 09/29/2003 9:58:22 AM PDT by christynsoldier (remember, a vote for Bubbanegger is a vote for the Kennedy clan...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; habs4ever

"I coulda been somebody! I coulda been a contender!"

McClintock 2005?

Dan

32 posted on 09/29/2003 9:59:08 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Schwarzenegger can't help it if he's perhaps the greatest action movie star in Hollywood history and someone with a keen business saavy and who's a lot smarter than people think.

He's the right man at the right time for CA....McChickentock needs to step down, he'd be better off running against Boxer for the Senate.

33 posted on 09/29/2003 9:59:23 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Der Slickmeister and the Hildebeast have obviously succeeded with Schwarzenkennedy and his supposedly "Republican" supporters as to the morality thing. Can socialized medicine, the village, etc., be far behind?

I hope that an interview with the goat and his/her veterinarian will make the weekend news.

34 posted on 09/29/2003 10:01:35 AM PDT by BlackElk (Schwarzenegger is as Republican as his wife's Uncle Teddy or her Uncle Bobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
unless they have footage of Arnold raping a goat,

No, that would be an acceptable lifestyle choice here. Now shooting and eating a goat, that might upset the soccer moms.

35 posted on 09/29/2003 10:02:03 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Actually, it's a bit different than that.

He's innoculated against these accusations because he's been honest.

He's on the record as saying that he's smoked everything, drank everything, and had sex with plenty of crazy women.

Where people get in trouble for sex scandals is not so much the sex, but the dishonesty.

Besides, we expect movie stars, who are at the top of the pyramid of sexual desirability to, well, have sex. And they do. If they didn't, their audience of tabloid readers would probably be disappointed.

D
36 posted on 09/29/2003 10:05:35 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
What kind of job will Tom have now that he's leaving politics?
37 posted on 09/29/2003 10:08:24 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Robert_Paulson2
Maybe Maytag need a new spokesman ;-)
38 posted on 09/29/2003 10:08:41 AM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rftc
Supporting McClintock gets us into another 1992 Perot situation which saw Bill Clinton elected, you cannot argue that now

Here again you are wrong. Studies have shown that w/o Perot Clinton would have won. Just why was Perot a factor? Because the pubbies put up an awful candidate. They continue to put up the RINOs. They keep loosing & if the true conservatives don't stay & form a new party this country will go as liberal as Canada. RUSH is right on this issue to keep the true conservative people in focus.

39 posted on 09/29/2003 10:12:35 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Digger
So Arnold is an 'awful candidate' beating 4 opponents singlehandedly right now (McClintock, Huffington, Busta, Carmajo)
40 posted on 09/29/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT by rftc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson