Posted on 09/28/2003 11:10:11 AM PDT by ambrose
I'm working overtime on this one, to make up for those who aren't helping...
Cheers, CC ;)
And then you say we're narrow minded?
Hate to tell you this sweetie, but when Arnold wins - he'll need all the conservative help he can get. And those 'moderate independents' aren't going to do squat all. So why don't you grow up and express disagreement without trying to force McClintock supporters out of the republican party? 'Cause honey, we're not leaving...
standing ovation
Indeed.
"One judges a man by the quality of his enemies."
- Michael the Archangel
SO9
Go right ahead!! Just don't link to it... my poor little server is overloaded and my bandwidth allotment keeps getting used up, shutting off my graphics for hours at a time!! When you put it up on a server somewhere... can I link to it? Send me the link!
Here's a high resolution version that I don't post anymore because it overshoots my bandwidth allotment...
High Resolution Hillary Commie 197,206 bytes
Low Resolution Hillary Commie 62,770 bytes
There is another version I made online at StrangeCosmos, but they gave someone else credit for it. (I don't care as long as the Beast gets shown for what she is.) That one has a little eye movement in it... I don't post it beacause the eyes didn't come out that good... and it's too much work to do it over again.
Man I never thought about that. I hope for his sake Ahnold doesn't like to ski or fly his own plane.
Because your "arnie" is going to destroy not only the state's econ, but your precious party.
Any other bright questions?
That is pretty funny, who went off on an off topic tangent again?
I did answer/expose this person's argument point-by-point.
Guilty Conscience? Worried about being "exposed" yourself? I used to enjoy your Hate about Hillary back in the day, then the Gulf war came and I did some counter protesting of the hippies. They were SO consumed with vitriol and evil towards Bush when I debated them. It was so base, so illogical that I thought it was unprecidented. I confronted them on it and they said "you hated Clinton the same way" I said no way, then I thought of you...I'm against Clinton too, but not obsessive like you are. Your UnChristian hatred is really not much different than the Demos, its just the letters in front of the politicians' name. Its consumed you and made you literally insane. That's why it is so easy for you to not only oppose a Conservative like McClintock, but to be consumed with the same ugly hatred for the man. Its not principles that motivate you, its partisanship ugliness.
The irony, in your guilt conscience response to "All" is that you answered NOTHING. That map deep sixed your entire make-believe world, and all you came up with was that Bush carried "SOUTH" states. Well duh, those were states with Democratic Govs, all of the Blue ones where, and the Red, were ones with RINOs who lost the state for Bush. That was the point, MENSA candidate.
Like I tried to tell you before you went all non-linear on me, I hope you figure this out before you have something to regret. And let go of the hatred of McClintock and Clinton, it does your soul no good.
My position regarding McClintock is this:
1- He has displayed a political rigidity that renders him uniquely unfit to be governor of a politically and culturally diverse state like CA.
2- Voting for him will have unintended consequences. I suspect that aiding and abetting hillary clinton is anathema to you; but that is precisely what you will be doing if you vote for McClintock. Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock. . Face it.
3- This race is about more than provincial ideology, yours or anyone else's. It's the whole ball of wax. bill clinton didn't say, "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis" for no reason. The clintons haven't insinuated themselves into this race for no reason.
Regarding my assertion that the southern states were a confounding variable, you are right. Not to make excuses ;), but it was late (I'm on the east coast), I was tired, I only glanced at your graphic and made an error. Sorry
As for the clintons and obsession, I do find them to be grotesque and dangerous. I do despise what they have done to our country, to our children and to the world. And I try to do my small part to expose them. When the threat of the clintons is gone, I will stop writing about them.
Do I hate the clintons? Is it appropriate to hate Hitler, or a rapist, or a corruptor of our children?
"Face it"...ha ha ha cuz you are out of gas. Its called a circular arguement and you are making it. "Its true" cause I said it a sentence before...
Do I hate the clintons? Is it appropriate to hate Hitler, or a rapist, or a corruptor of our children?
No, it is never healthy to hate. Hate the sinner, not the sin. Once you go down that path, you turn into what you are fighting. The ends don't justify the means.
The above text is not an "argument," "circular" or otherwise. it's a statement of a fact that is derived from the simple mathematics of the situation, and is self-evident to all but those of the most parochial mindset. If you would like to see some logic that flows from this fact, see below. (I don't think you are going to like it, but you did ask for it.) |
Given: To Prove:
Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock
Voting for McClintock will cause us to lose the war on terror
No, it is never healthy to hate. Hate the sinner, not the sin. Oh, you mean like what Gore lectured to Katherine Prudhomme about the RAPIST IN CHIEF? "Hate the rape but love the rapist? " ![]() The Senate tried that one and we were left with a pair of documentably unfit, grotesquely dysfunctional rapists in the Oval Office for 2-plus additional years, precious years lost to thwart the terrorists. And the sorry endpoint of "loving the rapist" was 911 with all of its ramifications. Great.
|
Responding to a rhetorical, circular statement with this; it's a statement of a fact that is derived from the simple mathematics of the situation, and is self-evident to all but those of the most parochial mindset. is most assuredly just the next thing someone will say when out of gas and citing themselves as a reference.
You have given me no reason to vote for your guy, which is typical of those consumed with zealous fervor. Just that supposedly it helps in your hatefilled quest against the Clintons. (Didn't your Celebrity say that impeaching that which your life is devoted to hating made him "ashamed to be a Republican?" Do you even know what you are fighting for?) Your guy helps Hillary far more than any other option, not only does he get her contributors access to CA State business deals, but his failure to cut enough spending to keep from raising taxes which will destroy my state (read: not yours) and probably cost me my job (read: not yours) will help Her carry CA in 04. Thanks for everything. One day you'll understand. If you have any honor you'll admit your mistake.
And for crying out loud, quit pooping up My Comments with all your Clinton spam or I'm done with you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.