Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
For the record and his resorting to ad hominem notwithstanding

That is pretty funny, who went off on an off topic tangent again?

I did answer/expose this person's argument point-by-point.

Guilty Conscience? Worried about being "exposed" yourself? I used to enjoy your Hate about Hillary back in the day, then the Gulf war came and I did some counter protesting of the hippies. They were SO consumed with vitriol and evil towards Bush when I debated them. It was so base, so illogical that I thought it was unprecidented. I confronted them on it and they said "you hated Clinton the same way" I said no way, then I thought of you...I'm against Clinton too, but not obsessive like you are. Your UnChristian hatred is really not much different than the Demos, its just the letters in front of the politicians' name. Its consumed you and made you literally insane. That's why it is so easy for you to not only oppose a Conservative like McClintock, but to be consumed with the same ugly hatred for the man. Its not principles that motivate you, its partisanship ugliness.

The irony, in your guilt conscience response to "All" is that you answered NOTHING. That map deep sixed your entire make-believe world, and all you came up with was that Bush carried "SOUTH" states. Well duh, those were states with Democratic Govs, all of the Blue ones where, and the Red, were ones with RINOs who lost the state for Bush. That was the point, MENSA candidate.

Like I tried to tell you before you went all non-linear on me, I hope you figure this out before you have something to regret. And let go of the hatred of McClintock and Clinton, it does your soul no good.

155 posted on 09/29/2003 8:12:29 AM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (That's pre-election bogus, Arnold Schwarzenegger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
I don't hate Mcclintock at all. A narrow, parochial attitude will often lead one to erroneous conclusions...

My position regarding McClintock is this:

1- He has displayed a political rigidity that renders him uniquely unfit to be governor of a politically and culturally diverse state like CA.

2- Voting for him will have unintended consequences. I suspect that aiding and abetting hillary clinton is anathema to you; but that is precisely what you will be doing if you vote for McClintock. Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock. . Face it.

3- This race is about more than provincial ideology, yours or anyone else's. It's the whole ball of wax. bill clinton didn't say, "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis" for no reason. The clintons haven't insinuated themselves into this race for no reason.

Regarding my assertion that the southern states were a confounding variable, you are right. Not to make excuses ;), but it was late (I'm on the east coast), I was tired, I only glanced at your graphic and made an error. Sorry

As for the clintons and obsession, I do find them to be grotesque and dangerous. I do despise what they have done to our country, to our children and to the world. And I try to do my small part to expose them. When the threat of the clintons is gone, I will stop writing about them.

Do I hate the clintons? Is it appropriate to hate Hitler, or a rapist, or a corruptor of our children?


thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

156 posted on 09/29/2003 9:26:12 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson