[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Voting for him will have unintended consequences. I suspect that aiding and abetting hillary clinton is anathema to you; but that is precisely what you will be doing if you vote for McClintock. Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock. . Face it.

"Face it"...ha ha ha cuz you are out of gas. Its called a circular arguement and you are making it. "Its true" cause I said it a sentence before...

Do I hate the clintons? Is it appropriate to hate Hitler, or a rapist, or a corruptor of our children?

No, it is never healthy to hate. Hate the sinner, not the sin. Once you go down that path, you turn into what you are fighting. The ends don't justify the means.

[Mia T]

Voting for him will have unintended consequences. I suspect that aiding and abetting hillary clinton is anathema to you; but that is precisely what you will be doing if you vote for McClintock. Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock. . Face it.

The above text is not an "argument," "circular" or otherwise. it's a statement of a fact that is derived from the simple mathematics of the situation, and is self-evident to all but those of the most parochial mindset.

If you would like to see some logic that flows from this fact, see below. (I don't think you are going to like it, but you did ask for it.)

 

Given:
Aiding and abetting hillary clinton is an unintended consequence of voting for McClintock

To Prove:
Voting for McClintock will cause us to lose the war on terror

1. The CA electoral votes are necessary for clinton redux. (Premise based of the mathematics of the situation)
2. Clinton redux is sufficient to lose the war on terror. (Premise based on historical fact)
3. Thus, wresting control of CA from the clintons is a necessary precondition for victory in our war against the terrorists
4. Thus, voting for McClintock will cause us to lose the war on terror.
   

 

 

clinton: "This is WA-A-AY bigger than Gray Davis."xx

[Mia T]

No, it is never healthy to hate. Hate the sinner, not the sin.

Oh, you mean like what Gore lectured to Katherine Prudhomme about the RAPIST IN CHIEF?

"Hate the rape but love the rapist? "

GORE ON CLINTON RAPES-THE VIDEO

The Senate tried that one and we were left with a pair of documentably unfit, grotesquely dysfunctional rapists in the Oval Office for 2-plus additional years, precious years lost to thwart the terrorists.

And the sorry endpoint of "loving the rapist" was 911 with all of its ramifications. Great.