1 posted on
09/26/2003 7:47:17 PM PDT by
webber
To: webber
I wonder what the reaction would've been if he had handed out condoms with the same wording . . .
To: webber
"The teacher seized the pencils and reported the boy to the principal." I'm lost for words.
To: webber
Judge: 'You say this small child tried to distribute unlawful pencils having the name of Jesus engraved on them at an Easter party?'
Teacher: 'Yes, your honor.'
Judge: 'An Easter party being held in remembrance of whom?'
Teacher: 'I was afraid you were going to ask me that.'
4 posted on
09/26/2003 8:44:38 PM PDT by
Eastbound
To: webber
Pass em out anyway Daniel, pass em out anyway.
5 posted on
09/26/2003 8:51:03 PM PDT by
Norse
To: webber
Daniel, an appropriate name. Ludicrous! The teacher should've been seized instead for child abuse (most 4-year-olds love their teachers as though they were family--I can't even imagine how hurt Daniel must've been) and for violating his freedom of religion and of speech rights.
6 posted on
09/26/2003 8:56:17 PM PDT by
skr
(The liberals are only interested in seeking Weapons for Bush Destruction)
To: webber
INTREP - RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ALERT
To: webber
"Congress shall make no law establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Since when is a kid "Congress" and since when do the recipients have to take the pencils, like people have to follow the enacted laws of Congress? The people responsible for this case are asses.
8 posted on
09/26/2003 10:25:33 PM PDT by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson