FairOpinion is telling you the absolute entire truth! Obviously! Thank you!
Posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:31 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP
There is no argument about the serious condition of our once golden state. Our debt is greater than all the other states combined, we are but a few million dollars away from bankruptcy. Our tax burden and over regulations are driving business out of the state at an unprecedented rate.
We are at a crucial point in our state’s history. The people themselves; Democrat, Republican and Independents, without the approval or help from any party have called for an election to recall this governor and replace him with another, one who will hopefully lead us out of this mess.
There appears to be a wide agreement on the first question; should we recall Governor Davis. The second part, choosing a new governor, will not be difficult for most Democrats: theirs is a party line vote with only one candidate, Lt. Gov. Bustamante. And even though he said he will raise taxes and further regulate and tax business, forcing more of them to leave, they will vote for him.
For Republicans however this election is about more than which Republican we should vote for. This election is more about the party itself; will we continue to be a party of principle, directed by the philosophy of Lincoln and Reagan or have we laid our principles aside? Do we want to win so badly that it doesn’t matter how or who, just so the next governor has an R behind his name?
The GOP has two candidates: Arnold Schwarzenegger, a celebrity of worldwide fame, with popularity and fame as the Terminator and recognized as a super star among movie idols. He is a good man. His celebrity status alone will attract a huge number of votes for the GOP from Independents, Democrats and especially young voters. Among the 18 to 30 year olds, he is Britney Spears with muscles. They wow over him. Most moderate Republicans and many regular Republicans, those who desperately want a Republican to win, will vote for him. They are prepared to look beyond his political beliefs and character; they just want to win.
Sen. McClintock, on the other hand, is an icon among Republicans. Since the first day he was elected to office, nearly twenty years ago, he has led the fight against the very forces and policies that have now badly tarnished this once golden state. He fought Governor Wilson’s huge tax increase, just as hard as he fought Willie Brown and Gray Davis. His credentials, as well as his character as a conservative Republican, are impeccable.
He has been our party’s leader and severest critic of fraud, corruption and waste in state government. From the very beginning of his career until today, he has warned that unless spending was brought under control, California would end up as it has today.
The knock on McClintock is that he can’t raise the money and so, can’t win this election. The knock on Schwarzenegger is that he is not a true Republican and carries a lot of baggage that the Democrats will probably throw at him just before the election.
Actually, Arnold is no higher in the polls than he was when he started, whereas McClintock has risen from an asterisk to double digits.
In the last election, McClintock was outspent 30 to 1, yet he received more votes than any other other Republican on election day. Had those moderates claiming Tom can’t win today contributed to his election, or given him his fair share of the money donated by the national party, he would have won. McClintock lost the Controller’s race by the slimmest margin in history. Had he been helped by the moderates controlling our state party, California would not now be in the awful mess in which we find ourselves today.
The moderates of the party and most of the GOP congressmen are just where they were prior to the last Governor’s race. On orders from the White House and Karl Rove, many "conservative" congressman support Schwarzenegger, just as they endorsed the moderate Richard Riordan.
The moderates in our party, including the New Majority and those in the Lincoln Club, are intensely interested in electing Schwarzenegger, a moderate. They believe the party’s future, especially in California, is to adopt the Karl Rove/Parsky plan; we must forgo the values of the liberals and accept the invasion of illegals, adopt the big tent, tax and spend and big government philosophy of the Democrats.
Conservatives know that our party’s losses in California, all during the past decade, are due to millions of illegals who have entered California, and – the continued split in our party between the moderate, "Country Club" Republicans and the conservatives.
While Arnold has a high rating in the polls, it has never risen above where it started. McClintock on the other hand has been continually rising, from as asterisk to double digits. There is a cry from moderate Republicans and "concern" from the media that McClintock should withdraw in favor of Arnold, else the GOP might not win and the dreadful Bustamante will become governor.
This dilemma among the GOP might not be so tragic or apocryphal if the contest was between two conservatives, say Simon and McClintock, one would drop out when just before the election the other was ahead. The same can be said if the two Republicans were Arnold and some equally famous, moderate movie star, but it isn’t.
It’s between our brightest Republican star, a conservative icon and a dazzling celebrity. Conservatives at the core of the party are incredulous at those moderates who don’t share those core values, yet are asking the conservative standard bearer to drop out. Conservatives want to win but they know that a win that asks us to repudiate our principles is not a victory, it’s a harbinger of the end.
Lieutenant Colonel Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.), served in the California State Assembly from 1984 to 1994.
Agreed. Then vote for McClintock--not Schwarzegger. There is still time.
Bump.
If the quisling Republicans who are threatening to destroy Tom McClintock's career for daring to stand for conservative principle redirected even half of their deluded anger and resentment toward the liberal pukes in the party elite who have fallen to their knees in worship of Emperor Arnold, they could turn California back from the edge of the liberal abyss it is teetering on.
Fine. Don't formally drop out, just "suspend" your campaign and urge your followers to oppose Davis and Bustamante by voting for Schwartzenegger. Then you can keep to your principles, and still correct the mistake you made by promising not to drop out in the first place (no one in public life should ever unequivocally say "never", knowing how unpredictable events can be).
Oppose Davis and Bustamante by voting for someone who holds the same positions?
FairOpinion is telling you the absolute entire truth! Obviously! Thank you!
Arnold is not my boy. McClintock is my boy. McClintock doesn't have a chance though.
The problem that people are failing to see is that Arnold is also drawing votes from the left. McClintock cannot do that. So if Arnold was gone, either the recall would fail or Bustamante would be your next governor. Becuase many of the votes that Arnold is getting would not vote for McClintock. Period.
You live in California in 2003. You aren't getting another Ronald Reagan. Your best bet is to move if you are waiting for that to happen. How you seem to think I am some type of hollywood worshipper is your own problem. McClintock is the best bet for California...but, it ain't happening. Arnold is about the best you are gonna get this time around with the voting base that you have in that state. Don't get mad at me for being a realist.
Hope you get it.
The only shame here is that some people are too damn stupid to see a lost cause. Even if McClintock took the right conservative votes, all the other vote that Arnold is appealing to would go back to Bustamante or Davis if McClintock pulled ahead.
Vote for McClintock and feel proud. What do you want me to say? Vote however you want. If Bustamante wins because of you principled people, I am going to laugh my hiney off. Have so many people forgot that guy named Perot? Does anybody remeber a guy named Clinton? There were many principled people before Clinton's eight years of office. Thank God they stuck by their guns and voted for Perot...we almost ended up with Clinton...oh wait, we got Clinton. Hmmm, somehow Bush doesn't seem so bad after all.
The alternative you imply -- post with rank or anonymously, is phony. You posted the man's rank, in order to sway readers to give him extra credit, beyond the strength of his arguments. There's an old saying, about not being a respecter of persons. It sounds discourteous to contemporary ears, but it isn't. It refers to rank and social status. Rational public debate is no respecter of persons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.