Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
"...it was actually brought about because the U.S. military could not function at adequate staffing levels without them."

Horse hockey. How did we manage to fill military manpower requirements for all those years when women were practically non-existent (in the military), and not to be seen in deployed units and naval vessels? Put out a call for more volunteers, or re-instate the draft. But to use the argument that we can't fill our slots with anyone other than women is weak...very weak. Yes, we'd have to change our PC mindset that's been cultivated over the last 30 years, but it could be done.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

8 posted on 09/26/2003 7:32:05 AM PDT by wku man (Bucs 31, Atlanta 10...oh how sweet it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: wku man
Put out a call for more volunteers, or re-instate the draft.

You're actually making my point. The U.S. did not have a problem filling the ranks with men when the military was larger, and even the mere suggestion that a draft might be needed to fill the ranks illustrates just how serious the problem is.

There are a number of factors at work here, including demographics, economic considerations, etc. that make it harder to recruit soldiers today than it was even 20 years ago.

10 posted on 09/26/2003 6:24:56 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson