Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WL-law
For the civil rights claim the plaintiff has to prove that a state actor violated his rights -- and, from what I can gather, since Adams could not provide any threshold evidence to support a conspiracy between the alleged state actor (Randell) and the thugs, you can't sustain a civil rights claim.

Hold that thought. I will post evidence of such a conspiracy soon. Obviously it did not convince this judge, but it might be grounds for appeal.

I actually hoped to have it posted by now, but it's rather long and I haven't found the time to finish typing it in.

73 posted on 09/26/2003 12:14:34 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
Hold that thought. I will post evidence of such a conspiracy soon. Obviously it did not convince this judge, but it might be grounds for appeal.

Even many federal judges attempt to cover-up corruption by state and local public officials. I know this all too well. Same goes for the FBI and many U.S. Attorneys.

I suspect the Circuit Court will reverse the motion for summary judgment and remand for trial.

75 posted on 09/26/2003 12:41:21 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson