Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California recall: Does one man hold key? [McClintock]
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 9-25 | Christian Science Monitor

Posted on 09/25/2003 2:54:50 PM PDT by ambrose

The Christian Science Monitor - csmonitor.com

from the September 26, 2003 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0926/p01s03-uspo.html

California recall: Does one man hold key?

Tom McClintock, top GOP conservative, could tilt race for or against Arnold Schwarzenegger.

By Daniel B. Wood | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

BURBANK, CALIF. - Republican candidate Tom McClintock laughs from deep in the belly when asked if he will be the "spoiler" in the great populist revolution/experiment/circus of California's gubernatorial recall election.

"My opponents say I'm the Ross Perot of this campaign, possibly siphoning off enough votes to hand the election to Democrats," he says, settling onto a shady park bench for an interview. "I say, 'Wait a minute.... Ross Perot was an idle millionaire, with no public-policy experience who one day on a whim entered the presidential race.' That sounds like another candidate in this race ... not me," he says, referring to muscleman/millionaire Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Once a mere asterisk in the con- fused calculus of California's 135-candidate recall election, Mr. McClintock has gradually emerged as the strong, third-place vote getter in polls - rising (at 14-to-18 points) while the two leaders - fellow Republican Schwarzenegger (26 points) and Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante (28 points) - tread water.

As the race enters its final stretch, McClintock's motives and acts are becoming paramount for two reasons. One, splitting the Republican vote, he could cost the party its best chance in a decade of high, statewide office. Two, his candidacy could drag down the success of the recall itself by forcing Republican partisans to reconsider driving Gov. Gray Davis from office because of fear that they could hand the office to a more liberal Democrat, Mr. Bustamante.

Ever since McClintock leaped from 4 percent voter support to double-digits about three weeks ago, the pressure has risen for him to stop offering himself as an alternative to Arnold Schwarzen-egger that could hand the election to Democrats. But as more voters get to know him, his poll numbers have continued to rise, while Schwarzenegger's are flat.

More conservative than Schwarzenegger on social issues - abortion, gay marriage, gun control - he is also far more experienced in fiscal matters, with California's sagging economy the No. 1 issue.

"He is by far the most studied and experienced of all the candidates in fiscal issues and how to implement public policy," says Jack Pitney, political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. "If the election were a college SAT test, McClintock would be the next governor hands down."

Even though he is widely acknowledged as the more knowledgeable, the more articulate, and the more detailed idea-man, 25-year government veteran McClintock does not have the millions of dollars of his chief Republican rival, nor his name recognition. Therein lies one of the chief ironies of the recall: Does he/should he/will he step aside to allow the neophyte challenger - and the Republican party - to gain its best chance of victory?

"He is a man who stands on his word and his principles while claiming time and again that he is in this to the last," says Doug Jeffe, a longtime California political consultant. "If he did get out, it would be totally uncharacteristic of him."

Now, with Schwarzenegger and Bustamante in a near dead heat, one leading Republican, Darrell Issa, the millionaire who bankrolled the signature gathering to oust Davis, has said that if Schwarzenegger or McClintock don't back off, Republicans should vote "no" on the recall. Polls show that if Arnold backed out, McClintock could not win.

But McClintock rejects a widespread analysis that conservative candidates have brought Republican fortunes to their low ebb. He feels the current crisis is the perfect storm for their historic comeback.

"Great parties are built on great principles," says McClintock, referring to the pillars of conservative policy: holding down taxes, cutting waste, standing up for the unborn, and resisting government approval of gay unions. "This is not a time to change our principles."

While such comments win kudos from some for adherence to principle, they strike others as bullheaded.

"McClintock's constant megaphoning of conservative social agendas is presenting a real problem for Republicans who really like him for his fiscal experience," says William Schneider, a pollster and political analyst. "They know Tom has the smarts to get this state out of economic problems and they worry about Arnold's lack of experience and specificity. But they don't think Tom can win and can't resist the fact that Arnold could."

As a child, McClintock campaigned for Barry Goldwater at age 8. In high school he organized classmates into a statewide GOP group. A political-science graduate of UCLA, he became a syndicated columnist railing about former Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, lauding the character of John Wayne. Hired by a former L.A. police chief-cum-state senator (Ed Davis), McClintock began a 25-year career in Sacramento, marked by opposition to Republican governors George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson over tax hikes and spending waste.

Despite his conservative stances, he was the top GOP vote-getter in the state, running for controller, in the 2002 election.

"I got very little from the state GOP and was outspent by my opponent by 5 to 1," says McClintock. "Despite all that, I lost by less than 1 percent of the vote."

A man who often quotes Reagan and Shakespeare, McClintock is considered a legislative loner with few legislative friends for his near two-decade pursuit of shrinking the state payroll.

In his favorite stump speech he tells why cutting is so important. As a child, he came home from school to find his mother crying over an unexpectedly high tax bill. The moment has lived in his imagination ever since that government takes too much from citizens and delivers too little.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links


www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2003 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
For permission to reprint/republish this article, please email copyright@csps.com



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 501-517 next last
To: massadvj; PhiKapMom
Yeah, you registed a long time ago.

But it looks as if you only started posting on 9/1. Funny, that.

Oh, I have all sorts of reasoned replies. But it takes a reasonable reader. You got off two deliberate-ignorants in a row. One, maybe you really do live under a rock. Two, you're a shill.

You're a shill.

Dan
301 posted on 09/25/2003 7:30:14 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: strela
Hitler's minions

Hey, you managed to make several posts before dragging out the Hitler attack!

302 posted on 09/25/2003 7:30:14 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
He never was, he has always been a fraud!
303 posted on 09/25/2003 7:31:48 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: strela
How much money is it that Warren Buffett, Arnold's 'close friend and mentor' (Arnold's words, not mine), has given to Hillary Clinton and to Planned Barrenhood??

How much money has Dick Riordon given to RATs, strela?? Just curious...
304 posted on 09/25/2003 7:32:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Perhaps you are just on the outside looking in.
305 posted on 09/25/2003 7:33:33 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: strela
Wrong again:

http://www.calvoter.org/2002/general/propositions/topten.html
306 posted on 09/25/2003 7:33:43 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
You mean "we're all Rhinos"?
307 posted on 09/25/2003 7:35:16 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
I was born in California. My father and mother were both born in California. My daughter was born in California. I left the state in 1993 when I found I could no longer afford the taxes and the expense of running my small business there.

Today I own a small firm in Pennsylvania that churns a few hundred thousand dollars into our local economy, all money from outside the state and around a third from foreign countries. This is a benefit I am very happy to deprive of the socialist bastards who stole my homeland away.

Do I have a stake in this race? Maybe not. But I know there are many transplanted California natives like me, who are looking on with interest. I can run my business from anywhere, and I'd love to go back. But I have heard absolutely nothing from Arnold that would inspire me to do so. He basically is a friend of the already-rich liberals who live in the hills, hide in their multi-million dollar estates, and enact regulatory barriers to entry to try to keep small firms owned by imaginative and resourceful people out of the state.

The primary motivation of country club Republicans is to use government as an instrument to lock in their wealth. That's why they love big government so much. Big government can be a protector for big business in what is and has been a parasitic marriage of convenience sucking the California taxpayers dry.

Not that they don't deserve it. Like lemmings, they voted for every charlatan, including Pete Wilson, along the way. If they vote in either Bustagut or Schwartzwhatever, they'll have the government they deserve.

308 posted on 09/25/2003 7:36:19 PM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; BibChr
He acts like God commanded him to go out on a holy crusade for Arnold. I suppose he won't stop making his vicious remarks, so I'll just ignore 'em.
309 posted on 09/25/2003 7:36:36 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Way to go Dan!
310 posted on 09/25/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
You didn't know you were a member of the RINO Club? Although they must not know how to spell RINO because we keep getting pictures of Rhino's!
311 posted on 09/25/2003 7:39:27 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Nice outta stater insult!
312 posted on 09/25/2003 7:39:37 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
I fully support Arnold, and do not belong to a country club nor am I a socialist.

Maybe you aren't, but Arnold certainly qualifies on both counts.

313 posted on 09/25/2003 7:41:33 PM PDT by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
You're xlinton was a moderate democrat statement almost made me bite my tongue, because he was a flat out communist agent! One day the proof will come out. The beatch knows this!

But, I agree completely 'with winning in a democracy means more than getting just your own faction to like you'.

314 posted on 09/25/2003 7:44:01 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
"And before you go running to Report Abuse... your only reason you ping these people is to disrupt this thread ... you have become out own little FR DU...so dont cry your being abused "

We have not been abused. We have fought. You have lost. Rejoin the group or figure out what your next step is going to be?

315 posted on 09/25/2003 7:48:30 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Oh man, that is funny! LOL
316 posted on 09/25/2003 7:49:15 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Warren Buffett, Arnold's 'close friend and mentor' (Arnold's words, not mine), has given to Hillary Clinton and to Planned Barrenhood??

Warren also provided major funding for the creation of RU-486, the morning-after abortion pill.

317 posted on 09/25/2003 7:50:00 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
With his ineptness as demonstrated, perhaps he is a bureaucrat ;^)
318 posted on 09/25/2003 7:51:41 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: massadvj
You have an interesting story. Thanks for sharing it. It gives us all some real context and puts a human face on the costs of liberal governance.
319 posted on 09/25/2003 7:51:41 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
R(are)U(you)4(for)'86'(death)?

Yep, that too. Good point.

320 posted on 09/25/2003 7:54:09 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Call upon God to move on our behalf...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 501-517 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson