Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
He was making a Reagan analogy. The problem with the Reagan analogy though is that Reagan was at 35% in January 83, and was climbing all spring and summer.

The magic number is 50%. In the last 40 years, a president who is at 50% or higher on January 1st of the election year has won re-election. Those under 50% on that date, have lost. Period.

Bush is anywhere from 49 to 58% now. He needs to shore up his numbers by the end of the year. This is important for several reasons. First, fundraising. People stop giving money if they think it will be a waste. Secondly, the inevitability factor. People like backing a winner. You would be amazed at some in the mushy middle who will vote where they think most people are, because they like being on the winning side, and it doesn't really matter to them too much which side they are supporting. Thirdly, media coverage. The media are fear mongers, hype mongers, and pack animals. If the president appears unbeatable, they keep repeating that. If they sense weakness, they pound on him, and ignore the opposition's weakness. They are hyenas. Literally.

11 posted on 09/25/2003 7:09:46 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dogbyte12
Thanks for the very informative post.

If I could ask you, are you concerned with Bush having alienated many conservatives? I have only anecdotal evidence for that but the sample is telling: many people here on FR state they'd not vote for Bush.

17 posted on 09/25/2003 7:17:26 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson