Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock Says "he made a promise...he is in it until the end"...Live FNC
FNC LIVE | 09-25-03

Posted on 09/24/2003 9:03:26 PM PDT by Brian S

Tune in...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-231 next last
To: Oliver Boliver Butt
I missed all the pros of having Governor Bustamante...could you enlighten me?

No pros there.

The pros is that the Republican party doesn't disintegrate.

The pro is not having very competent Kennedy clan lefties running CA.

The pro is letting leftist dems enact their social agendas rather than a Republican.

A Schwarzenegger win moves the Republican maintstream in the wrong direction. Every major candidate will be considered a liability if he or she has a pro-family pro-life platform.

Essentially a Schwarzenegger win makes that current Mayor of NYC, who is a Republican, the mainstream Republican standard.

Schwarzenegger is for giving benefits to "domestic partnerships". To my mind that is a money grab pure and simple which will take more tax dollars.

He is against a proposition that disallows divisive and racist categorization of people. Cruz Bustamante is spending his millions to promote defeating this initiative.

Schwarzenegger is against vouchers.

These are all democrat left positions.

They also are issues that a governor actually has a major impact on.

If a Republican champions all these traditional leftist liberal positions, we have no opposition party anymore.

141 posted on 09/24/2003 10:24:32 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Interesting... I've noticed that many Perot voters are going with Arnold.

I guess they don't want to repeat their mistake.

Touché! lol!

142 posted on 09/24/2003 10:24:58 PM PDT by South40 (Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Brulte's pretty large but he isn't an organization.

I'm looking forward to seeing Sheldon's "morphing" advertisement.

143 posted on 09/24/2003 10:25:21 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: South40
The tone and content of my posts is directly related to the tone and content I see coming my way.

I do that a lot. Haven't on these threads though.

144 posted on 09/24/2003 10:26:41 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: abigail2
I just hope Tom doesn't stay in 'till the end if the numbers don't change alot. I think Tom as head of Arnold's cabinet on tax policy would be good. And between the two I'm sure we could get our borders protected.
145 posted on 09/24/2003 10:26:57 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: kingu
We disagree on Arnold vs Tom, but please, the worst possible outcome is Davis winning the recall and California having to re-pay Davis for all his campaign.

Agree. I stand corrected. I meant in the context of Davis being recalled.

Davis must be recalled.

146 posted on 09/24/2003 10:28:06 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"A Schwarzenegger win is the worst possible outcome. "

===

...FOR THE DEMOCRATS, that is what you meant right?

You can't possibly mean that a Bustamante win is better for Republicans, than a Schwarzenegger win, can you?
147 posted on 09/24/2003 10:32:17 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Brulte's pretty large but he isn't an organization.

*cringe* Burlte has, luckily, shed some pounds... Though he did a good job raising funds for Tom's controller campaign. Shame he didn't win against, err, whatever his name is. A Republican Controller would be mighty handy right now.
148 posted on 09/24/2003 10:32:51 PM PDT by kingu (Tom or Arnold, it doesn't matter if Davis wins the recall. Vote Yes on the Recall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Arnold has the endorsement of dozens and dozens of conservatives and GOP groups. McNader has none. Get used to it.

None of that goes to the point of why he does or doesn't "deserve" your vote. Reagan was opposed by the Republican establishment when he ran for president in 76 -- but he still had convictions and integrity and he deserved - and got - my vote in a primary. Whether McClintock deserves my vote has to do with his beliefs and abilities, not what some party hacks think about him or anybody else. I make up my own mind who I'll support - - and to deserve my vote, you have to be a conservative and knowledgeable and articulate on the issues. MClintock is all three in spades. Sounds like you make your decisions based on what other people - party hacks - tell you to think, and you find merit in the superficial, not substance.

149 posted on 09/24/2003 10:32:59 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"If Schwarzenegger wins the Republicans lose. We all lose. "


====

And you consider a Bustamante win, a win for the Republicans?
150 posted on 09/24/2003 10:35:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: fabian
between the two I'm sure we could get our borders protected.

oh, is that why Arnold won't support the initiative to repeal drivers licenses for illegals? The guy doesn't stand for anything, as far as I can tell. But a lot of freepers have fallen for him, that's for sure.

151 posted on 09/24/2003 10:35:20 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
That was great!! Nice to have some support.
152 posted on 09/24/2003 10:35:25 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"I've noticed that many Perot voters are going with Arnold. "

===

Some of the smarter ones were able to learn from their mistakes, unlike others.
153 posted on 09/24/2003 10:35:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: vger
Now there is an impartial poll.
154 posted on 09/24/2003 10:36:20 PM PDT by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kingu
And Jim Brulte, and David Drieir, and the Lincoln Club

Didn't they also support Riordan last year? Another Democrat in Republican Name.

155 posted on 09/24/2003 10:37:23 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
I agree. There isn't a doubt in my mind that if Tom weren't in this race forcing Arnold to the right (well, somewhat) all we'd be hearing about is education, Prop 49, and the children.

Thanks, for that. I agree.

156 posted on 09/24/2003 10:38:52 PM PDT by abigail2 (Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
BTW, am I the only one who can't stand the lame 60's music in that Hummer commercial with the go-carts?

Isn't that The Who? They are not lame by any stretch of the rock n roll imagination.

157 posted on 09/24/2003 10:39:09 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
Is that what your tea leaves say?Comparing McClintock to Clinton?McClintock ain't no Arkie.
158 posted on 09/24/2003 10:39:32 PM PDT by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Didn't they also support Riordan last year? Another Democrat in Republican Name.

I don't know whom they supported during the primaries. I do know that during the election for the governor, they supported Simon. That's what parties do, gather behind a single candidate.
159 posted on 09/24/2003 10:40:42 PM PDT by kingu (Tom or Arnold, it doesn't matter if Davis wins the recall. Vote Yes on the Recall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: fabian
"I think Tom as head of Arnold's cabinet on tax policy would be good. "

---
That and a bigger job to head the entire budget watch committe was offered to Tom at the Republican Convention, but he rejected it and is continuing his "I will not withdraw" mantra.

There was one thing I noticed in today's debate, which could be an indication -- either that, or I am trying to make it so: Tom didn't actually come out and tell people to vote for him, only to go to helptom.com, or whatever his website it. I hope this is an indication that he may pull out.

On the other hand right afterwards he went on H&C and kept insisting he is in it until the finish.

The Republican leadership and the party are getting very exasperated with him, it's becoming more and more obvious.
160 posted on 09/24/2003 10:42:19 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson