Skip to comments.
CNN Sources-Issa, Simon and Uberroth May Endorse Arnold as Soon as 9/25 (pending Debate outcome)
CNN Political Morning Grind ^
| September 24, 2003 12:40PM
| John Mercurio
Posted on 09/24/2003 1:39:58 PM PDT by rftc
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:09 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; california; endorsements; mcclintock; nazibrownshirtthugs; predebate; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
09/24/2003 1:39:59 PM PDT
by
rftc
To: rftc
AKA "For McClintock, a 'bridge too far'?"
I like the original title better, for once.
2
posted on
09/24/2003 1:42:48 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
("America loves a winner...America will not tolerate a loser.")
To: rftc
Are there sources on this beside CNN? Since CNN is notoriously unreliable, who were the individual(s) who said this? Absent info, we should assume that the sources are lying through their teeth, like a "Professor of History" who appeared on CNN last night and absolutely BUTCHERED the history of Germany post-WW II compared to Iraq, today, for example.
3
posted on
09/24/2003 1:43:25 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: rftc
Hughly series!
Vote for Tom

Vote for Arnold

Or vote for Tom Arnold
4
posted on
09/24/2003 1:43:45 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: RichInOC
"For McClintock, a 'bridge too far'?"
===
I think Brulte or Issa said that.
To: FairOpinion
The article says Brulte.
6
posted on
09/24/2003 1:44:25 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
("America loves a winner...America will not tolerate a loser.")
To: Congressman Billybob
Are there sources on this beside CNN?Actually, I had a dream about this very thing last night. I can report that my dreams are WAY more reliable than CNN's news coverage.
7
posted on
09/24/2003 1:45:07 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: My2Cents
Sorry, I could never vote for somebody who'd had little enough judgment that he was once married to Roseanne Barr.
And as for the other celebrity ticket in this race, I'd have problems voting for Tom Cruise because he got divorced from Nicole Kidman. My God...what was he thinking?
8
posted on
09/24/2003 1:46:20 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
("America loves a winner...America will not tolerate a loser.")
To: Congressman Billybob
Thats why I clarified it was CNN sources, I'm not getting involved in this until October rolls around..
9
posted on
09/24/2003 1:47:18 PM PDT
by
rftc
To: RichInOC
How about Father Guido Sarducci, isn't he running on the ballot?
10
posted on
09/24/2003 1:49:22 PM PDT
by
rftc
To: My2Cents
you know you're a junkie when you've had a political dreams...I've had some weird ones myself!
11
posted on
09/24/2003 1:51:02 PM PDT
by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: RichInOC
Nicole divorced Tom. Big difference. She did so because his Scientology clashed with her Christian upbringing and values.
12
posted on
09/24/2003 1:51:55 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: rftc
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
To: Phantom Lord
I believe she didnt want sher kids growing up to be Scientologists..
14
posted on
09/24/2003 1:53:09 PM PDT
by
rftc
To: Phantom Lord
Nicole divorced Tom. Big difference. I read that it was Tom that ditched Nicole because of the 10 year clause in the prenup.
15
posted on
09/24/2003 1:53:13 PM PDT
by
krb
(the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
To: Phantom Lord
I still blame Tom. Like Paris, Nicole is worth a mass.
16
posted on
09/24/2003 1:54:24 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
("America loves a winner...America will not tolerate a loser.")
To: rftc
I believe she didnt want sher kids growing up to be Scientologists.. I vote for her.
To: RichInOC
Speaking of Nicole kidman, did you ever see her in "Practical Magic", a movie from about 5 years ago?
She and Sandra Bullock were sisters......
18
posted on
09/24/2003 1:56:19 PM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(All eyes were on Ford Prefect. Some of them were on stalks.)
To: rftc
The reality of the matter is that TOM CAN NOT WIN! Period. End of story. And you TOMBOTS can flame me all you want.
Arnold, while not a rock solid conservative like Tom, supports many GOP positions and has the greatest chance of winning.
Of course, TOMBOTS would rather go down in flames and have Davis beat the recall (which I still personally think he is going to do) or have Cruz win. I am almost hoping for Cruz to win.
I have said in the past and will say again. If California wouldn't be a 1000 Ton Anchor on the American economy I would like to see the state dissolve into absolute economic and social chaos rivaling a 3rd world country.
The RATS bragged about having total control of California and wanted the rest of America to look to California to see how great and wonderful things would be with them in absolute and total power in the state. They don't say these things anymore. And unfortunatly, outside of Neal Boortz, no one on the national level ever points out the predictions the RATS made and how proud they were of what they were going to do and how great it was going to be.
19
posted on
09/24/2003 1:58:08 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: votelife
I once dreamt that "kellynla" came at me with an ax.
20
posted on
09/24/2003 1:58:36 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson