Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shilling for Schwarzenegger: Hugh Hewitt strikes again
September 24th, 2003 | Sabertooth

Posted on 09/24/2003 12:33:19 PM PDT by Sabertooth

Hugh Hewitt, a well-known conservative radio talk show host and political columnist, has written a short column today called California recall: One issue, and one issue only

Hewitt got on the Arnold Schwarzenegger bandwagon the day after the actor's candidacy was announced on Jay Leno's Tonight Show. His column today is a hopeful attempt to at favorable spin for Schwarzenegger prior to tonight's gubernatorial debate (6:00 pm, PDT), the first at which Schwarzenegger's appeared.

A few of Hugh's highlights...

My take is that unless Arnold comes up with the California equivalent of President Ford's declaration of a free Poland in 1976, the debate will be a non-factor in the race.

Oh, it could seal the end of Tom McClintock's career if he tries to land cheap shots on Arnold

Hugh Hewitt is fretting about "cheap shots" against the debate-ducking, excited-to-be-learning-the-issues Anold Schwarzenegger?

Will Hewitt's definition of "cheap shots" include any mention of Schwarzenegger's left-leaning comments or positions that are the issue for tens of thousands of California Republicans not willing, at this point, to vote for Arnold? Should McClintock tip-toe around all of that, for the dubious "good of the party?"

Schwarzenegger has conducted a run-and-hide campaign, hoping the field would clear as he ran out the clock. Didn't happen, Hugh. Bad strategy.

Schwarzenegger missed chances to earn respect and sway holdouts by skipping debates. There are consequences to missed opportunities.

There is only one issue that matters to most voters. It absorbs all other issues in this race: The corruption in Sacramento.

The workers' comp mess? It is about the corrupt influence of the trial lawyers. The huge giveaways to prison guards and other public-employee unions? The corrupt influence of big labor. The massive expansion of tribal casinos and the obscene amount of money pouring from the slots into the voting process? The corrupt influence of California's Indian tribes.

Leave it to Hugh Hewitt to prepare a laundry list of Sacramento's corruption that doesn't include Gray Davis' legally questionable spiking of California's Proposition #187, after it was held in the judicial dungeon of Carter appointee, District Judge Marian Pfaelzer for three and a half years under the Pete Wilson administration.

Proposition #187 would have prevented much of the fiscal crisis now facing California, by preventing the State from paying any benefits or providing social services to California's millions of Illegal Aliens. The corrupt Democrats used the courts and a dubious arbitration process to thwart the will of the voters here.

The Democrats knew they could get away with it, because of the rank cowardice of the Republic Party, from the RNC, Jack Kemp, Bill Bennett, George W. Bush, Orrin Hatch, John McCain, etc., on down. Democrat corruption doesn't happen in a vacuum, it is enabled by do-nothing Republicans.

Among the do-nothings on Illegal Aliens are not a few self-absorbed conserative talk show hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Medved, and... Hugh Hewitt.

No surprise, then, that Hewitt won't mention Sacramento's corruption with regard to Illegal Aliens: Hugh is part of the problem.

Most of this corruption is legal. Most corruption is. But the stench of the decay in Sacramento doesn't diminish because Gray Davis has invented transparency in payoffs. The tribes brazenly gave millions to Cruz who transferred it to an anti-initiative campaign that features, surprise, Cruz. The money-laundering is out in the open, on the front lawn of the State House - but it is no less corrupt.

Gray Davis' penchant for soliciting donations just prior to signing or vetoing legislation that would affect the donors is legendary, and a clear violation of conflict-of-interest, in spirit, if not in law.

But Hugh Hewitt goes on...

The tribes pumped huge sums into a pro-McClintock fund. This is legal, but it stinks. It is a manipulation of the electorate - a cynical assist to Cruz via the draining of votes from Arnold. Corrupt? Of course it is. Tom McClintock cannot raise enough money on his own under the $21,200 limit of the law, so he's welcoming the tribes' largesse via an independent expenditure.

As for McClintock, any campaign finance law that respected the First Amendment would allow the tribes to give as much money as they please direcly to his campaign. People who don't like gambling or Indian casinos are free to vote against candidates who recieve campaign contributions for the trbes.

One example of such a candidate, of course, would be Arnold Schwarzenegger, who took contributions from some Indian tribes in the campaign for his government-growing, Proposition 49 - after school program.

Democrat Cruz Bustamante denounced Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger as a "phony" and a "hypocrite" for running television ads questioning the political clout of Indian gaming tribes that have contributed large amounts of money to the lieutenant governor.

He noted that Schwarzenegger raised money from tribes to support last year's Proposition 49, the Schwarzenegger-sponsored ballot initiative to finance after-school programs.
San Diego Union-Tribune - September 24th, 2003

Ooops.

That's a bit of legal corruption (by his own definition) that slips under Hugh Hewtt's selective radar, while he's shilling for Arnold Schwarzenegger.

And ain't if funny how Hugh Hewitt objects to independent expenditures on behalf of Tom McClintock, given that...

...records show that Total Recall, a committee controlled by Schwarzenegger that is permitted to raise unlimited sums to promote the recall, is also spending money specifically to boost Schwarzenegger's candidacy. Records show that Total Recall transferred $211,000 to Californians for Schwarzenegger, and is helping to pay the salaries of several top campaign staffers.

Colleen McAndrews, the campaign's lawyer and treasurer, said the division of money between the two committees was done with the approval of the Fair Political Practices Committee, the agency charged with overseeing state campaign finance law.
Davis, Schwarzenegger lead fund-raising race
Redding Record Searchlight - August 29th, 2003

Here is a list of 19 donors (including Arnold), to Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Campaign, which isn't subject to California's Proposition #34 campaign finance restrictions...

Arnold Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Committee
19 records found (1 page.)


Contributor Employer Amount Date
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER [Google]  OAK PRODUCTIONS, INC. $500,000 09.04.2003
ALEX SPANOS [Google]  A. G. SPANOS COMPANIES $100,000 09.09.2003
AMERICAN STERLING CORPORATION [Google]   $100,000 09.08.2003
WILLIAM A. ROBINSON [Google]  NONE $100,000 09.16.2003
WILLIAM LYONS HOMES, INC. [Google]   $100,000 08.22.2003
PAUL FOLINO [Google]  EMULEX $99,164 08.25.2003
CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. [Google]   $78,800 09.09.2003
THE NEW MAJORITY PAC [Google]   $78,800 09.18.2003
DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. [Google]   $60,000 09.05.2003
FLETCHER JONES MANAGEMENT [Google]   $57,600 09.08.2003
PAUL FOLINO [Google]  EMULEX $40,000 09.22.2003
TIMOTHY DRAPER (THE TIMOTHY DRAPER LIVING TRUST) [Google]  DRAPER, FISHER, JURVETSON $20,000 09.22.2003
FRANK E. BAXTER [Google]  JEFFERIES & COMPANY, INC. $10,000 09.22.2003
ROBERT YELLIN [Google]  CAL. PROTECTION $10,000 09.02.2003
TIMOTHY DRAPER (THE TIMOTHY DRAPER LIVING TRUST) [Google]  DRAPER, FISHER, JURVETSON $10,000 09.19.2003
JOHN HURLEY [Google]  CAVALRY ASSET MGMT. $3,442 09.10.2003
JOHN STAHR [Google]  LATHAM & WATKINS $2,500 08.28.2003
JOHN C. HERKLOTZ [Google]  NONE $2,000 09.19.2003
JOHN R. SAUNDERS [Google]  SAUNDERS PROPERTY CO. $2,000 09.18.2003
Total itemized contributions to committee: $1,374,306  
19 records found (1 page.)



Arnold Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Committee
RecallMoney.com - Updated September 22nd, 2003

For a complete list of donors to Californians for Schwarzenegger, who are subject to California's campaign finance restrictions, go here.

Note Schwarzenegger's $1.5 million loan to his own campaign. Though the loan is legal, potential for conflicts of interest will arise when Schwarzenegger is raising the money to pay himself back.

Note also that Hugh Hewitt omits all of this information in his piece today.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: hewitt; hughhewitt; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger; specialinterests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: Hildy
It is you who lies on illegal immigration. He has clearly stated that he is not for "amnesty" would not deport anyone, and wants to seek a way to "legalize" the illegals already here. Try reading what he actually says. He also stated that he would do nothing to enforce prop 187, or try to enact similar laws.

If you are going to argue, at least know your facts.
81 posted on 09/25/2003 4:55:46 AM PDT by brownie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Well considering that this Ahnoid hasn't and doesn't levy insults, I'm not really sure what you're point is there.

But meanwhile, enjoy your kamakaze mission. BustaMECHA will be in your debt for it.
82 posted on 09/25/2003 7:34:38 AM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

I am the only candidate at this table who has signed a no-tax pledge. I am the only candidate at this table who supports Proposition 54 to stop the government from racially classifying every one of us. I'm the only candidate at this table that supports the California Republican Assembly's referendum to stop the bill that gives driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. I'm the only candidate at this table who's pro life. I'm the only candidate who supports the entire Bill of Rights, including our Second Amendment. And I'm the only candidate who for 20 years in the public arena has proposed and fought for precisely those fiscal forms that are desperately needed to straighten out this state's finances. Now, we over the years have always been disappointed by politicians who make a promise and don't carry through on it. We've seen a lot of campaign promises made and broken just in the span of this very brief campaign. There's one thing friend and foe alike agrees about Tom McClintock, and that is when I make a promise, I keep it. I steer a straight course and I stay that course no matter what the pressure. And here's my commitment to the people of California: I will cut spending and balance this budget without a tax increase, and that is a promise.
Recall Debate Transcript - September 25th, 2003



83 posted on 09/25/2003 7:35:48 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
It may be that I am confusing Sabertooth with another of the McClintock faithful. Sometimes I lose track of who's who in this debate.

So for that, I offer my apologies.

As for HH's support of Ahnold, HH is a realist. He's also a STUDENT OF THE ART OF POLITICS. He does it for a living.

Most of us don't.
84 posted on 09/25/2003 7:36:32 AM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
car·pet·bag·ger (-"ba-g&r) n.
1 : a Northerner in the South after the American Civil War usually seeking private gain under the reconstruction governments
2 : OUTSIDER; especially : a nonresident or new resident who meddles in politics
We've had this discussion before and I really don't see how the word applies, Pelham.
85 posted on 09/25/2003 7:38:26 AM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"I am the only candidate at this table who has signed a no-tax pledge.

I am the only candidate at this table who supports Proposition 54 to stop the government from racially classifying every one of us.

I'm the only candidate at this table that supports the California Republican Assembly's referendum to stop the bill that gives driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.

I'm the only candidate at this table who's pro life.

I'm the only candidate who supports the entire Bill of Rights, including our Second Amendment.

And I'm the only candidate who for 20 years in the public arena has proposed and fought for precisely those fiscal forms that are desperately needed to straighten out this state's finances..." - Tom McClintock

As I posted on another thread, Tom's execution last night was extraordinary.
But it was not enough.
See also:

Beware the 5 Stages of "Grief"
[practical advice for McClintock supporters, as the race ends]

www.counselingforloss.com ^ | Last Update 02/01/01 | TLC Group, Dallas Texas
Posted on 09/25/2003 4:58 AM PDT by RonDog

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

86 posted on 09/25/2003 9:49:18 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
I couldn't help but notice how you DE-EMPHASIZED this:

"...and get them on a path toward legal residency status in the United States."

How convenient for you.

87 posted on 09/25/2003 10:21:03 AM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
This is the same WND columnist that attacked Joe McCarthy, comparing him to Patrick Leahy.

Read this: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28460

I've never read a Hewitt article since.

-james
88 posted on 09/25/2003 3:06:53 PM PDT by jamesRI1776 (Bush isn't really a conservative, now is he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
I'll let it remain a mystery to you then. It doesn't pay to belabor the obvious.
89 posted on 09/25/2003 8:33:16 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson