Skip to comments.
State GOP leaders press McClintock to quit recall race
San Jose Mercury News ^
| Sep. 24, 2003
| Dawn C. Chmielewski and Ann E. Marimow
Posted on 09/24/2003 11:28:58 AM PDT by CHUCKfromCAL
In the clearest sign yet that the Republican Party is coalescing behind actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, three influential party leaders Tuesday ratcheted up the pressure on state Sen. Tom McClintock to abandon his bid to be governor.
The state's ranking Republican, Senate Minority Leader Jim Brulte, said McClintock's candidacy threatens to put another Democrat in the governor's office. The man who bankrolled the recall petition drive, U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, pointedly called on McClintock to drop out of the race. And the former head of the party, a fellow conservative, is asking county chairs to endorse the more moderate Schwarzenegger at a meeting Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock; recall; withdraw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: CHUCKfromCAL; BibChr; onyx; PhiKapMom; Tamsey; redlipstick; habs4ever; My2Cents; South40; ...
ping
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: CHUCKfromCAL
Since I and countless thousands have already placed our votes, McClintock would be "disenfranchising" and negating a whole lot of voters if he quit at this late a date.
4
posted on
09/24/2003 11:44:27 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: SunStar
McClintock should stay in until about a week before the election to have his ideas heard.
Then if it looks too close, he should pull out and get behind Arnold. As sad as it is, I think Davis would be better than Bustamante. The point is that Republicans will suffer if this recall is unsuccessful. It will be played up nationally by the Dems as a failed attempt to overturn an election by the true will of the people. At some point Tom should swallow his pride and do what's best for California and the Republican party.
5
posted on
09/24/2003 11:57:45 AM PDT
by
zencat
To: zencat
At some point Tom should swallow his pride and do what's best for California and the Republican party.IMHO, we passed that point a week or two ago.
Now the only issue is whether McC will "swallow his pride" and stop the gushing hemmorhage of his credibility and future with the GOP.
Dan
6
posted on
09/24/2003 12:04:44 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: CHUCKfromCAL
"And the former head of the party, a fellow conservative, is asking county chairs to endorse the more moderate Schwarzenegger at a meeting Thursday."
===
I read that the Republican Chairs put out the memo and 33 out of 34 endorsed Arnold already at the Convention.
To: CHUCKfromCAL
I like the way Brulte put it:
"``For Tom, the governorship is simply a bridge too far,'' said Brulte of Rancho Cucamonga, who stopped just short of calling for McClintock to withdraw at a press conference announcing his endorsement of Schwarzenegger. ``His candidacy puts at risk not only the election of a Republican governor, but the recall itself.''
To: CHUCKfromCAL
Issa is laying right on the line too. Sounds like 99% of prominent Republicans are sick and tired of McClintock's game playing and stubbornness.
"And he said McClintock had promised him before the recall qualified for the ballot that he would run only if there was a crowded field and would not be a spoiler for another Republican candidate.
``Those words will not be forgotten, because it's no longer a crowded field and he is going to be a spoiler,'' Issa said in an interview Tuesday. ``I'm holding Tom McClintock to the promises he made to me, and I believe he's a man who will keep his promises.''
===
Well, apparently Tom does NOT keep his promises.
To: CHUCKfromCAL
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
To: CHUCKfromCAL
McClintock should quit and throw his support to Arnold, but get concessions first.
To: DoughtyOne
"Sen. McClintock holding state hostage" -- good one and true.
To: SunStar; DoughtyOne; Poohbah; Tamsey; PhiKapMom
Since I and countless thousands have already placed our votes, McClintock would be "disenfranchising" and negating a whole lot of voters if he quit at this late a date. Too bad.
14
posted on
09/24/2003 2:18:25 PM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(All eyes were on Ford Prefect. Some of them were on stalks.)
To: FairOpinion
``I'm holding Tom McClintock to the promises he made to me, and I believe he's a man who will keep his promises.'' And these guys love to have candidates sigh these "all or nothing" pledges.
Could Tommy Boy be trusted to keep one?
15
posted on
09/24/2003 2:20:11 PM PDT
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(All eyes were on Ford Prefect. Some of them were on stalks.)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Yes, something to be proud of. I can't wait to see their glee at the administration of Governor Cruz Bustamante.
To: CHUCKfromCAL
Tom looks and sounds more and more like this guy everyday.
17
posted on
09/24/2003 3:21:13 PM PDT
by
South40
(Tommy Chong is a criminal; what kind of FReeper would support a criminal?)
To: FairOpinion
"Tom does not keep his promises"
How do you figure that ..?? JUST BECAUSE TOM DOESN'T FOLLOW YOUR TIMETABLE ..??
Arnold's people don't want Arnold to debate Tom - WHY ..?? Because Arnold could lose!! That's why they want Tom out - NOW!!!
I believe Tom has been responsible for FORCING ARNOLD TO SHIFT MORE TO THE RIGHT - in order to get conservative votes. What is BAD about that ..??
If Arnold wins the debate - your argument will be over - and it won't matter if I vote for Tom or not, because Arnold will be able to win easily.
18
posted on
09/24/2003 4:37:51 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(America - The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
To: FairOpinion
We have all witnessed the corruption of the democratic party from within and more as more leftist ideologes join the party and get elected.
You are witnessing the corruption of the republican party the same way with Arnold. He is a globalist socialist like all the democrats, but because you think he is a teensy bit more conservative than they are, you think everyone else should give up their principles and vote for him. How does corrupting the republican party with people who do not support the republican platform help anyone? Oh, then these new republicans will change it, make it more liberal so that more people will vote for them. Pretty soon, you will see the republican party tilting so far left you won't recognize it, just like the democratic party has. It certainly won't help get the state back on track, and it helps the leftists because it is only a matter of degree, before they get a really leftist candidate voted in on the republican ticket. They will say, after all, "he's the only one who has a chance of getting elected". Clearly that is a method of propagandizing the voter who should be voting for the person who will stand for their values, not for the values of the opposing party.
We have seen over and over politicians ignoring the electorate to push the globalist agenda. Arnold, if elected will do the same. And California will keep suffering and we will lose all our freedom to the open border social engineering globalists who are looting California for all its worth.
To: South40
Name calling is propagandizing.
I remember hearing Bill O'Reilly talking about Arnold. He wanted to give Arnold a pass because he didn't know how the state government was run, a pass because he didn't have an opinion on key issues, and a pass because he didn't have his platform in place, and then vote for the guy.
However, Mr. McClintock does know how the government works (the governor can't "repeal" the illegal immigrant driver license law, he has to support the referendum) he had positions that were in harmony with the republican platform and he had a platform. So why not vote for the guy who is the most qualified instead of giving a pass to a guy who doesn't know what he is doing and will very likely continue the disasterous support of illegals and other socially leftist policies the current governor supports? Or maybe its because too many people support the corruption of the republican party and want to force it to the left?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson