Arnold has done 1000s upon 1000s of interviews with the press in every corner of the globe in his 20+ year career and made over a billion dollars understanding how to play to the camera. There is no more media savvy candidate.
Since debates are as much about image as message (Norwood/Dingle, anyone), McClintamantites that think Arnold is going to be outclassed in front of the cameras are delusional.
Of all candidates for public office in this great nation (or do you just mean California?), Schwarzenegger is at the top of the heap? Will you please tell us your criteria for evaluating these tens of thousands of candidates, your evidence of Schwarzenegger's superiority, and your evidence of their inferiority so we can substantively evaluate the accuracy of your claim?
I am beginning to suspect that Schwarzenegger's supporters have no real evidence beyond their own emotional opinions. Resorting to hyperbole is usually a solid indicator of emotion overtaking reason.
Arnold has done 1000s upon 1000s of interviews with the press in every corner of the globe in his 20+ year career and made over a billion dollars understanding how to play to the camera. There is no more media savvy candidate.
Hoverbug took care of this argument here, not that it didn't quite parse to begin with.
I'll give you credit for "working harder", though ;-).