Skip to comments.
*Poll says McClintock could win 1-0n-1 matchup*
National Review (The Corner) ^
| 9/22/03
| Peter Robinson
Posted on 09/24/2003 7:54:23 AM PDT by TheBigB
Brother Hugh, some news.
John Eastman, a professor of law at Chapman University and a frequent guest on your radio program, has just brought to my attention a poll that will interest you. Commissioned by the Lincoln Club of Orange County, the poll includes the following results:
If Arnold Schwarzenegger found himself in a head-to-head race against Cruz Bustamante--that is, in effect, if Tom McClintock dropped out of the race--then Schwarzenegger would win, 44 to 37 percent.
But if Tom McClintock found himself in a head-to-head race against Cruz Bustamante--that is, in effect, if Schwarzenegger dropped out of the race--then McClintock would win, 42 to 40 percent.
From the beginning, Hugh, you have made a single argument against McClintock, insisting that he cannot win.
But he can.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; cruz; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-346 next last
To: JCEccles
If Republican voters see evidence that a McClintock, a true conservative, can beat Bustamante, that they don't have to settle for a candidate who is far to the left of them, might they not be expected to support McClintock? If so, why would that evidence not be relevant? If these poll figures are a pipe dream, why are not the polls you are relying on to justify your claim that only Scwarzenegger can be elected, pipe dreams? What evidence are you using to draw your distinction?Very simple. This "alleged" poll shows that McClintock could win IF Arnold was out of the picture...
Arnold is proven that he has a very good shot at winning even with McClintock, but it would be close. With McClintock out if the picture, it would be a cakewalk.
Come Nov '04, is it's Clark vs. Bush vs. Nader, and the poll was done Bush vs. Nader, Bush would win all 50 states in a landslide, maybe even D.C. Ok, maybe not DC... The facts are, Clark won't be dropping out, so comparing Bush to Nader is irrelevant.
To: skeeter
Obviously Hugh and the CA GOP have rejected conservatism. This is exactly what I have been screaming for weeks now.!! The time is coming, indeed, is ALREADY here where the true conservatives are going to dis-engage themselves from the RINO Republicans and form a conservative party. I dare say it will grow FAST as did FOX NEWS when they leaned toward the right in broadcasting.
To: pollywog
Wasn't something similar tried by Buchanan and Smith (N.H.)? Failed miserably. Splitting it from the GOP will assure Dem victories for many many decades. Nice....
To: skeeter
Obviously Hugh and the CA GOP have rejected conservatism.I know what he'd say to that, "you must want Bustamante, I am a realist and I am the real Republican"...I've heard it so many times its laughably pathetic at this point. Hugh will never recover from this in Talk Radio no matter how this turns out. He may call himself a better Republican, but only this one.
104
posted on
09/24/2003 9:35:52 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: NYC Republican
Arnold is proven that he has a very good shot at winning even with McClintock, but it would be close. With McClintock out if the picture, it would be a cakewalk.Close win or cakewalk, a win is a win. Why wouldn't you prefer a close win by a conservative over a cakewalk by a liberal?
The bottom line: evidence suggests that a conservative can win in California in this particular election at this particular moment in time. That makes liberal Schwarzenegger the interloper. If any Republican candidate deserves the contempt of conservative voters, it is Schwarzenegger--not McClintock.
To: NYC Republican
He CAN'T win, as long as Arnold's in there. Arnold's not going anywhere. That is not what the Arniebots have been saying. They've been saying McClintock can't beat Bustamante. Of course Tom can't beat Arnold in a 3-way race as Arnold is the spoiler. Remove the liberal spoiler and the conservative has a chance.
106
posted on
09/24/2003 9:37:16 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: HamiltonJay
Tell me all of this tomorrow after Arnold blows it big time in the debate tonight.
107
posted on
09/24/2003 9:38:23 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: Poincare
"Tom says he will be in to the end--the end may be for him the day before the election if the Swartzenegge numbers hold. I have the greatest respect for Tom taking the heat from his own party for the good of the party."
You may be right. But here is the problem I see with that strategy. If Tom stays in until the day before and then pulls out tossing his supporters to Arnold, how does he get the word out fast enough to accomplish that purpose. Does anyone think the media will help with that? "IF" it were so that Tom "cannot win" then it would be to the media's and the Dem's advantage to keep mum and let the Republicans split the vote just enough to elect Busto.
Arnold is not my choice but Busto is even less.
To: pollywog
Join the Constitution party. You'll never win an election, but you'll have like-minded company with whom to commiserate.
109
posted on
09/24/2003 9:39:10 AM PDT
by
onyx
To: onyx
Do you not want to believe McClintock can beat Bustamante?
To: Dave S
A sunny day could bring out enough Dems to put Bustamante over the edge in a 42-40 race."Could"? I thought poll numbers were God? That is the best you got? Your constant yelling of "Boo" at Conservatism is getting pretty lame now on Sept 24th. Is their any depth you will not sink to in order to say it "can't be done?"
Next thing you we know "Dave S" is just going to be screaming Aiiieeee! in the debatory meltdown.
111
posted on
09/24/2003 9:40:31 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
To: Spiff
That is not what the Arniebots have been saying. They've been saying McClintock can't beat Bustamante. Of course Tom can't beat Arnold in a 3-way race as Arnold is the spoiler. Remove the liberal spoiler and the conservative has a chanceAnother reality check... If Arnold never got into the race, the recall would NEVER pass. Only someone with ***STAR*** power can fend off the steady stream of (what passes for) powerful Dems campainging on Davis' behalf. McClintock would have been chewed up and spit out long ago...
To: Spiff
So let me get this straight, the guy who makes a living in front of the cameras and on television, is great at PR and has been successful in no less than 3 different industries is going to blow it tonight because he'll have a fat racist hispanic on one side of him and a fat egotistical white man on the other??
pardon me if I say I think not.
To: My2Cents
Wasn't this the spread in the poll released yesterday? Even with McClintock in the race, Arnold beats Cruz by 7% (or was it 8%?).
It was 7% among certain voters and higher in the probable voters...... The Ca Chamber of Commerce did a head to head poll around the 1st week of Sep. and Tom didn't do that well... down 6% if I remember correctly.
I'd like to see this poll. Get some actual data on it, like when was it done, MOE, etc. There is no doubt that in certain parts of the state Tom should win a head to head match up....
114
posted on
09/24/2003 9:40:56 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Spiff
Tell me all of this tomorrow after Arnold blows it big time in the debate tonight.Prediction- Arnold's performance will crush all others tonight.
Comment #116 Removed by Moderator
To: NYC Republican
If Arnold never got into the race, the recall would NEVER pass.What is your evidence? How do you know that?
To: JCEccles
McC CANNOT beat Bustamencha, but Arnold CAN and I think he will despite the blind-with-ambition, obtuse McC.
118
posted on
09/24/2003 9:46:32 AM PDT
by
onyx
To: onyx
McC CANNOT beat BustamenchaWhat is your evidence? How do you know that?
To: JCEccles
I don't have time for you. Obviously, from your perch in Utah, you have not kept abreast of CA politics.
120
posted on
09/24/2003 9:49:17 AM PDT
by
onyx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-346 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson