Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*Poll says McClintock could win 1-0n-1 matchup*
National Review (The Corner) ^ | 9/22/03 | Peter Robinson

Posted on 09/24/2003 7:54:23 AM PDT by TheBigB

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-346 next last
To: JCEccles
If Republican voters see evidence that a McClintock, a true conservative, can beat Bustamante, that they don't have to settle for a candidate who is far to the left of them, might they not be expected to support McClintock? If so, why would that evidence not be relevant? If these poll figures are a pipe dream, why are not the polls you are relying on to justify your claim that only Scwarzenegger can be elected, pipe dreams? What evidence are you using to draw your distinction?

Very simple. This "alleged" poll shows that McClintock could win IF Arnold was out of the picture...

Arnold is proven that he has a very good shot at winning even with McClintock, but it would be close. With McClintock out if the picture, it would be a cakewalk.

Come Nov '04, is it's Clark vs. Bush vs. Nader, and the poll was done Bush vs. Nader, Bush would win all 50 states in a landslide, maybe even D.C. Ok, maybe not DC... The facts are, Clark won't be dropping out, so comparing Bush to Nader is irrelevant.

101 posted on 09/24/2003 9:31:11 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Obviously Hugh and the CA GOP have rejected conservatism.

This is exactly what I have been screaming for weeks now.!! The time is coming, indeed, is ALREADY here where the true conservatives are going to dis-engage themselves from the RINO Republicans and form a conservative party. I dare say it will grow FAST as did FOX NEWS when they leaned toward the right in broadcasting.

102 posted on 09/24/2003 9:33:48 AM PDT by pollywog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
Wasn't something similar tried by Buchanan and Smith (N.H.)? Failed miserably. Splitting it from the GOP will assure Dem victories for many many decades. Nice....
103 posted on 09/24/2003 9:35:01 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Obviously Hugh and the CA GOP have rejected conservatism.

I know what he'd say to that, "you must want Bustamante, I am a realist and I am the real Republican"...I've heard it so many times its laughably pathetic at this point. Hugh will never recover from this in Talk Radio no matter how this turns out. He may call himself a better Republican, but only this one.


104 posted on 09/24/2003 9:35:52 AM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA ((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Arnold is proven that he has a very good shot at winning even with McClintock, but it would be close. With McClintock out if the picture, it would be a cakewalk.

Close win or cakewalk, a win is a win. Why wouldn't you prefer a close win by a conservative over a cakewalk by a liberal?

The bottom line: evidence suggests that a conservative can win in California in this particular election at this particular moment in time. That makes liberal Schwarzenegger the interloper. If any Republican candidate deserves the contempt of conservative voters, it is Schwarzenegger--not McClintock.

105 posted on 09/24/2003 9:36:42 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
He CAN'T win, as long as Arnold's in there. Arnold's not going anywhere.

That is not what the Arniebots have been saying. They've been saying McClintock can't beat Bustamante. Of course Tom can't beat Arnold in a 3-way race as Arnold is the spoiler. Remove the liberal spoiler and the conservative has a chance.

106 posted on 09/24/2003 9:37:16 AM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Tell me all of this tomorrow after Arnold blows it big time in the debate tonight.
107 posted on 09/24/2003 9:38:23 AM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Poincare
"Tom says he will be in to the end--the end may be for him the day before the election if the Swartzenegge numbers hold. I have the greatest respect for Tom taking the heat from his own party for the good of the party."

You may be right. But here is the problem I see with that strategy. If Tom stays in until the day before and then pulls out tossing his supporters to Arnold, how does he get the word out fast enough to accomplish that purpose. Does anyone think the media will help with that? "IF" it were so that Tom "cannot win" then it would be to the media's and the Dem's advantage to keep mum and let the Republicans split the vote just enough to elect Busto.

Arnold is not my choice but Busto is even less.

108 posted on 09/24/2003 9:38:42 AM PDT by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
Join the Constitution party. You'll never win an election, but you'll have like-minded company with whom to commiserate.
109 posted on 09/24/2003 9:39:10 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Do you not want to believe McClintock can beat Bustamante?
110 posted on 09/24/2003 9:40:21 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
A sunny day could bring out enough Dems to put Bustamante over the edge in a 42-40 race.

"Could"? I thought poll numbers were God? That is the best you got? Your constant yelling of "Boo" at Conservatism is getting pretty lame now on Sept 24th. Is their any depth you will not sink to in order to say it "can't be done?"

Next thing you we know "Dave S" is just going to be screaming Aiiieeee! in the debatory meltdown.


111 posted on 09/24/2003 9:40:31 AM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA ((R)nold called me a "Right wing crazy" because I have a problem with his position on Prop 54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
That is not what the Arniebots have been saying. They've been saying McClintock can't beat Bustamante. Of course Tom can't beat Arnold in a 3-way race as Arnold is the spoiler. Remove the liberal spoiler and the conservative has a chance

Another reality check... If Arnold never got into the race, the recall would NEVER pass. Only someone with ***STAR*** power can fend off the steady stream of (what passes for) powerful Dems campainging on Davis' behalf. McClintock would have been chewed up and spit out long ago...

112 posted on 09/24/2003 9:40:40 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
So let me get this straight, the guy who makes a living in front of the cameras and on television, is great at PR and has been successful in no less than 3 different industries is going to blow it tonight because he'll have a fat racist hispanic on one side of him and a fat egotistical white man on the other??

pardon me if I say I think not.
113 posted on 09/24/2003 9:40:53 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Wasn't this the spread in the poll released yesterday? Even with McClintock in the race, Arnold beats Cruz by 7% (or was it 8%?).


It was 7% among certain voters and higher in the probable voters...... The Ca Chamber of Commerce did a head to head poll around the 1st week of Sep. and Tom didn't do that well... down 6% if I remember correctly.

I'd like to see this poll. Get some actual data on it, like when was it done, MOE, etc. There is no doubt that in certain parts of the state Tom should win a head to head match up....

114 posted on 09/24/2003 9:40:56 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Tell me all of this tomorrow after Arnold blows it big time in the debate tonight.

Prediction- Arnold's performance will crush all others tonight.

115 posted on 09/24/2003 9:41:49 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: NYC Republican
If Arnold never got into the race, the recall would NEVER pass.

What is your evidence? How do you know that?

117 posted on 09/24/2003 9:45:17 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
McC CANNOT beat Bustamencha, but Arnold CAN and I think he will despite the blind-with-ambition, obtuse McC.
118 posted on 09/24/2003 9:46:32 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: onyx
McC CANNOT beat Bustamencha

What is your evidence? How do you know that?

119 posted on 09/24/2003 9:47:21 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
I don't have time for you. Obviously, from your perch in Utah, you have not kept abreast of CA politics.
120 posted on 09/24/2003 9:49:17 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson