Posted on 09/22/2003 11:58:14 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
A California lawmaker and a non-profit group are suing Gov. Gray Davis for allegedly usurping the rights of Californians by signing a bill that awards virtually all the rights of marriage to same-sex partners.
State Senator William Knight and the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund argue bill AB 205 signed Friday at the San Francisco Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center nullifies many aspects of Proposition 22, a ballot initiative approved three years ago by a 2-1 margin.
The initiative, passed in March 2000, said marriage in California is valid only between one man and one woman.
"California voters have spoken and they don't want marriage hijacked by Governor Davis or anyone else," said Vincent McCarty, director of the Center for Marriage Law, a non-profit group backing the lawsuit.
McCarty asserted Davis's action "shows crass contempt for democracy in California."
"More than 60 percent of the voters said they want marriage to be between one man and one woman, and they don't want Davis trampling that decision made by the democratic process," he said.
The suit also is being supported by the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund.
ADF counsel Bob Tyler, a California resident, said "the governor may believe that voters should be ignored, but we're here to say the California constitution and the rule of law still matter."
The lawsuit argues that when Davis signed AB 205 into law, he contravened the purpose and intent of Proposition 22, which now is a part of the Family Code.
"The family is the building block of our society. Marriage between one man and one woman is the foundation of the family," Karen England of the Sacramento-based Capitol Resource Institute said. "It is imperative that traditional marriage be preserved. Our children should not be subject to a radical, new social experiment of legitimizing 'gay marriage.'"
The new law conflicts with Proposition 22 because, according to the California Legislative Counsel's Digest, it "would extend the rights and duties of marriage to persons registered as domestic partners on and after January 1, 2005."
ADF and its allies have won similar challenges to marriage laws.
Courts in Minnesota, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, for example, have ruled against provision of employee benefits to domestic partners.
ADF also is involved in cases in Arizona, New Jersey, Maine, Nebraska and Florida.
Campaign for California Families, a family issues group that led an effort against AB 205, asked gubernatorial recall candidates to sign a Marriage Protection Pledge, promising to protect the benefits and privileges of marriage for a husband and a wife. State Sen. Tom McClintock was the only candidate to sign.
"Gray Davis and Cruz Bustamante have conspired to bring homosexual 'marriage' to California, disobeying the clear orders of the people," said Randy Thomasson, the group's executive director.
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links |
| Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list) |
| Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search |
| All FreeRepublic Bump Lists |
If you'd like to join the Homosexual Agenda ping list, please freepmail me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.