Skip to comments.
Press slants Iraq news: Dem congressional visitors speak out.
The Hill ^
| Sept. 22, 2003
| Hans Nichols
Posted on 09/22/2003 7:34:39 PM PDT by Gorilla44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
About damn time.
1
posted on
09/22/2003 7:34:40 PM PDT
by
Gorilla44
To: Gorilla44; Ragtime Cowgirl
Astounding!
2
posted on
09/22/2003 7:36:42 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Gorilla44
What! I thought Mr. Franken and Mr. Alterman said that there is no media bias. ~wink~
To: Gorilla44
Sounds like future Arkancide candidates to me
To: Gorilla44
The truth begins to leak out. Thank you very, very much for posting this article. I needed the encouragement.
5
posted on
09/22/2003 7:40:13 PM PDT
by
solzhenitsyn
("Live Not By Lies")
To: Gorilla44
jeeez...had these people visited FreeRepublic.com they would've found this out and not needed to travel halfway around the world.....
Let's do our own poll; everytime you hear this story on the news post here when you heard it and what station it was on!
To: StarfireIV
Why just recently Joe Conason wrote all about how the media is right wing and pro Bush.
7
posted on
09/22/2003 7:48:58 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: Gorilla44
Oh, oh, if Wussly Clark reads this, especially about our innovative troops, he will have to switch positions on the war and the budget request again. On second thought maybe he won't. He rather likes the media's version of reality, after all, they claim him to be the Dem front-runner after 3 days.
8
posted on
09/22/2003 7:49:09 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: Gorilla44
it's about time somone started asking reporters to do more than talk to one another
To: Gorilla44
About damn time....and I didn't have to go to Iraq to know this...too bad, this will get very little air time....the media has chosen how they will report the Battle of Iraq.
10
posted on
09/22/2003 7:56:02 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(Happy Birthday, Mike...wish you were here.)
To: Gorilla44
Maybe these reporters are waiting for Saddam's Information Officer to appear, collect his money and cell phones, and offer them lies to print. It's easy.
Or maybe the old days of covering for Saddam's rapists, keeping the lid on stories about torture chambers etc., was more fun. They're too bored to leave the hotel.
Or maybe it's the obvious: trashing Bush and the military is all they know. New York, Paris, or Baghdad is the same. No need to leave a hotel for that type of reporting. Lazy.
Send them home, let them do a Jason Blair. They can write lying claptrap from home easier and cheaper.
Marshall also claimed that there now are only 27 reporters in Iraq, down from 779 at the height of the war. The reporters that are there are all huddled in a hotel. They are not getting out and reporting, he told The Hill.
11
posted on
09/22/2003 7:56:02 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: Gorilla44
Maybe these reporters are waiting for Saddam's Information Officer to appear, collect his money and cell phones, and offer them lies to print. It's easy.
Or maybe the old days of covering for Saddam's rapists, keeping the lid on stories about torture chambers etc., was more fun. They're too bored to leave the hotel.
Or maybe it's the obvious: trashing Bush and the military is all they know. New York, Paris, or Baghdad is the same. No need to leave a hotel for that type of reporting. Lazy.
Send them home, let them do a Jason Blair. They can write lying claptrap from home easier and cheaper.
Marshall also claimed that there now are only 27 reporters in Iraq, down from 779 at the height of the war. The reporters that are there are all huddled in a hotel. They are not getting out and reporting, he told The Hill.
12
posted on
09/22/2003 7:56:53 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: Gorilla44
We came away with the realization that a lot of the debate back here is really irrelevant. Just DUH!
Prairie
13
posted on
09/22/2003 7:59:25 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I have dozens of great taglines in my attic. I just can't climb up to get them.)
To: Gorilla44
We came away with the realization that a lot of the debate back here is really irrelevant.
Debate for the sole sake of debate is a pointless exercise in futility.
One "debates" when there exists a serious alternative viewpoint, with concerns that should be addressed.
Well, at least that is how it used to work in the real world. Now, any physcho with an opinion deserves the attention of the nation while the "opinion" is debated.
We cant just laugh at them, or ignore them anymore.
No, we must "debate".
No child left behind, at work in the adult world.
14
posted on
09/22/2003 8:01:07 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(Pray for Terri Schiavo.Pray harder.Please!)
To: Gorilla44
Good news for a change!
15
posted on
09/22/2003 8:18:47 PM PDT
by
lainde
To: sarasmom
We came away with the realization that a lot of the debate back here is really irrelevant.
They are meaning that the debate here is based on phony and false premises due to media's horrible reporting,that it makes it irrelevent to Iraq's real future.
16
posted on
09/22/2003 8:20:08 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(BUSH 2004)
To: WOSG
Well, thats a nicer way to say the press and the Democrat party is full of phychos.
17
posted on
09/22/2003 8:26:34 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(Pray for Terri Schiavo.Pray harder.Please!)
To: Gorilla44
BTTT
To: Right_in_Virginia
This is beginning to make the news - see post today "Inside Politics - 9/23"
19
posted on
09/23/2003 4:00:11 AM PDT
by
Elkiejg
To: Gorilla44
Index bump. The story is starting to come out.
20
posted on
09/23/2003 4:01:56 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson