Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP puts Arctic refuge drilling into energy bill
Houston Comical ^ | Sept. 22, 2003, 1:18PM | Associated Press

Posted on 09/22/2003 12:05:37 PM PDT by The_Victor

Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Republican lawmakers trying to craft an energy bill have decided to include a provision for oil drilling in an Alaska wildlife refuge as part of the initial draft of the compromise legislation, congressional sources said today.

The GOP "discussion draft" will include a House-favored provision that would allow oil development of the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as long as the footprint of development is limited to 2,000 acres.

The draft language, which is sure to be strongly opposed by Democrats involved in the energy talks, was to be formally unveiled later Monday, said GOP aides familiar with the ongoing negotiations.

A number of Senate Democrats have vowed to block final approval of an energy package, using the parliamentary stalling tactic of a filibuster, if an ANWR drilling measure is part of the bill. It would take 60 votes to overcome a filibuster in the Senate and even ANWR drilling supporters say at this time they don't have that many votes.

However, Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., the chairman of the energy negotiations, and Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., head of the House negotiators, decided to incorporate the House-passed language authorizing drilling in the Arctic refuge in hopes of swaying enough senators to nullify the filibuster threat.

"Sen. Domenici has been consistent and remains so in support of opening ANWR. He strongly believes this is the right thing for jobs, our economy and our national security," said Marnie Funk, a spokeswoman for the senator.

She said that Domenici knows that he may eventually have to drop the proposal if he is not convinced there are 60 votes to overcome a Senate filibuster. He "is not going to let this energy bill go down over one issue" whether it's ANWR or something else, said Funk.

Last week, Domenici said that "we're not going to let ANWR defeat a compromise energy bill."

Earlier this year drilling opponents got 52 senators to oppose development of the Arctic refuge's oil as drilling supporters came a dozen votes shy of the 60 that would be needed to overcome a filibuster. Last week 43 senators, including five Republicans, wrote letters to the energy conferees reiterating their opposition to ANWR drilling.

But drilling supporters hope to sway some of those senators by emphasizing the potential loss of widely popular programs if the energy bill fails to pass, including a requirement to use more corn-based ethanol, development of clean coal technologies and expansion of a program to help the poor pay energy bills.

The House, when it passed its energy blueprint last April, authorized oil exploration and development within ANWR's coastal plain as long as such activities do not disturb more than 2,000 acres of the tundra.

Proponents of drilling argue that the limits, as well as other environmental restrictions and use of modern technology, will provide adequate environmental safeguards. Critics of exploiting ANWR's oil argue that the 2,000-acre limit is meaningless because the area can be spread across the entire 1.5-million acres of the coastal plain, creating "a spider web" of development that would harm the pristine home to caribou, polar bears, musk oxen and migratory birds.

No one knows how much oil the coastal plain has. Federal estimates have ranged from 5.6 billion barrels (95 percent probability) to 16 billion barrels (5 percent probability) of technically recoverable oil. But environmentalists emphasize that at current oil prices much of that oil won't be worth drilling because of the high costs of development.

 


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anwr; anwr2003; energy; energybill; environment
Good news, the GOP is not giving up on this.
1 posted on 09/22/2003 12:05:37 PM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Good news, the GOP is not giving up on this.

It’s a sacrificial lamb - the first thing they’ll cave on during negotiations.

2 posted on 09/22/2003 12:08:47 PM PDT by dead (All that is not mandatory is prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
odds on when it gets taken out? The spineless party will crack. No way this will stay in when you've got such "hard core conservatives" as Snowe and Chaffee.
3 posted on 09/22/2003 12:09:22 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
bingo!
4 posted on 09/22/2003 12:09:38 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Good news, the GOP is not giving up on this.

Now, if they could only do the same with their judicial nominees.

5 posted on 09/22/2003 12:15:35 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
AT LAST ! Some GOP backbone !
6 posted on 09/22/2003 12:16:04 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
It’s a sacrificial lamb - the first thing they’ll cave on during negotiations.

Clearly.

They don't have the stones to fight for judges, they don't have the stones to fight for this.

About all they do have the stones to fight for is their own skin.

7 posted on 09/22/2003 12:16:25 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
AT LAST ! Some GOP backbone !

Don't get your hopes up.

8 posted on 09/22/2003 12:17:42 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
The 'progressive" party ain't so progressive when in comes to progress towards a better and more independent future for the good ol' USA. Somebody needs to point this out on a national level.
9 posted on 09/22/2003 12:37:11 PM PDT by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
High hopes,
we've got high hopes...
10 posted on 09/22/2003 12:41:52 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Somebody needs to point this out on a national level.

I think you just did. :)

11 posted on 09/22/2003 12:51:48 PM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
The unions were for this drilling. The Dems will shift just enough to pass this.
12 posted on 09/22/2003 12:56:24 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"The unions were for this drilling. The Dems will shift just enough to pass this."

The Teamsters said there was 10,000 union jobs invloved. But they stll endorsed the Dims. They ahve been supporting the Dims and watched as the union work force has dwindled down to 12% of the workforce. The rank & file are suckers.
13 posted on 09/22/2003 1:24:25 PM PDT by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Okay, now is the time to make the Senators have some spine .... names of the wimps on this issue???
14 posted on 09/22/2003 2:57:49 PM PDT by WOSG (BUSH 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Oh, and ..... Thank you Senator Domenici!!!!

15 posted on 09/22/2003 2:58:33 PM PDT by WOSG (BUSH 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Good news, the GOP is not giving up on this.

Stop it dude, you're killing me.

16 posted on 09/22/2003 3:01:14 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor; dead
Last week, Domenici said that "we're not going to let ANWR defeat a compromise energy bill."

Translation - We give up before the fight starts.

The "G" in GOP stands for "Glass Jaw".

17 posted on 09/22/2003 3:05:57 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
Stop it dude, you're killing me.

Perhaps I should add "yet".

18 posted on 09/23/2003 5:56:01 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson