Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Finds: "Children 'distressed' by TV news"
BBC On-Line ^ | 22Sept03 | staff writer

Posted on 09/22/2003 8:44:56 AM PDT by yankeedame

Last Updated: Monday, 22 September, 2003, 12:51 GMT 13:51 UK

Children 'distressed' by TV news


Children said 11 September was
the most violence they had seen on TV

Children find violence on TV news more disturbing than anything else on screen, a study has suggested. Children could easily tell the whether violence was real or not - and showed "little lasting impact" from violence they knew was fictional, it said.

But major news stories - such as 11 September - had the "greatest effect" on them, the report concluded.

Screen watchdogs and the BBC surveyed children between nine and 13 to find out how they viewed violent scenes.

The report said they accepted far-fetched TV dramas and cartoon-like film violence more easily because they knew they were made up.

Few major news stories had an impact because many children thought most were "boring".


Children can tell the difference between violence in news and soaps

But big stories, such as 11 September, war in Iraq and the killing of schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, did get their attention.

Those events made children feel "threatened" and "personally vulnerable", the report said.

"In turn, this can lead to genuine anxieties and changes in behaviour," the report said.

Children are most worried by scenes involving other children or that are closer to home - while other, more remote stories have less impact, it said.

'Challenge'

And unlike adults, children did not need to see acts of violence - but were more concerned by the consequences - the study said.

The report said the findings presented "a real challenge to broadcasters".

The Independent Television Commission (ITC), which was among the groups that compiled the report, said news broadcasters may need to consider giving warnings about potentially disturbing reports.

Professor David Morrison from the Institute of Communication Studies at the University of Leeds said for children, said the events of 11 September were "almost universally described as the most violent images they had seen on television".

'Getting worse'

"Children in the sample saw a high level of violence in the news, whereas adults in the previous study considered there to be little violence," he said.

"The news was more violent for them than for adults because it was real and what was real might become real for them."

The report was compiled by the ITC, the Broadcasting Standards Commission, the British Board of Film Classification and the BBC.

It also said children had the impression that the world was more violent now than in their parents' day.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childrenandwar

1 posted on 09/22/2003 8:44:57 AM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I was 9 when WWII started and 13 when it ended,the same age as the kids in the study.

Yes,news makes kids nervous. We didn't have TV but heard it on the radio,read it in the newspapers,and saw Movietone News every Saturday at the matinee,we also wore ID tags all the time and had air raid drills at school and home.

Good for BBC coming to the conclusion that news upsets children,it made us nervous but,life goes on.


2 posted on 09/22/2003 8:57:59 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
it should have the most effect on the poor little creatures, it's reality. 3000 people were murdered on 9/11. their parents should be happy their little monsters were spared the more gruesome aspects of body parts on the ground and people jumping from the 90th floor in desperation.
this is our world, there are the good guys...and there is evil.
3 posted on 09/22/2003 8:59:01 AM PDT by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I am made nervous by nervous children.
4 posted on 09/22/2003 8:59:03 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Let's just have happy news only.

For the children, of course.
5 posted on 09/22/2003 9:07:53 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Then I wonder what all those violent movies their parents are allowing them to watch are doing to them?
6 posted on 09/22/2003 9:08:51 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
It would be nice to have both.
7 posted on 09/22/2003 9:15:53 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"In turn, this can lead to genuine anxieties and changes in behaviour," the report said.

The report said the findings presented "a real challenge to broadcasters".

I think what is worrying the BBC is if the kids get too much direct or unfiltered information how will the BBC be able to mold them into mind-dead liberals.

8 posted on 09/22/2003 9:21:59 AM PDT by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I was 9 when WWII started and 13 when it ended,the same age as the kids in the study.

Could I ask you a question? How did you feel about the progress of the war at that time? I mean, did you feel like things were going well? That the war was going to be won by the US?

And also, the amount of info you were getting back then (I mean you personally), would you say that it was roughly equivalent to the amount of info the average American was getting? Was the info detailed or was it more general in coverage?

I have my own reasons for asking these questions. It hinges around the idea that we are actually less informed in many situations because we have too much info. Shining light on a subject is a good way to help you understand what the subject is. Too much light blinds. Too much info can blind as well. Too much info about specific details that leaves out other "balancing" details distorts. All the while we feel that we are more informed than we were in the past and I start to wonder if that's true or not.

9 posted on 09/22/2003 9:22:21 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Censorship ... to PROTECT the children!

Children should not be PROTECTED FROM life, they should be PREPARED FOR life. Knowing what is out there will enable young people to make the right choices once they encounter it, whatever 'it' is.

And it not up to the media to prepare kids, that's the parents job.
10 posted on 09/22/2003 10:06:14 AM PDT by appalachian_dweller (If we accept responsibility for our own actions, we are indeed worthy of our freedom. – Bill Whittle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
News media does tend to stick with gloom and doom. Fear is the number one movtivor for people. Everytime I watch the evening news the song Dirty Laundry keeps playing in my head.
11 posted on 09/22/2003 10:21:52 AM PDT by zx2dragon (I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson