Skip to comments.
“Tom Can’t Win”? Wrong – Do the Math – Silent Switch Makes McClintock Governor
9-22-03
Posted on 09/22/2003 7:28:24 AM PDT by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-362 next last
To: William McKinley
But to hope that a majority of another's support will change their minds in a period of two or three weeks just doesn't sound to me like a realistic hope. Realistic is not the same thing as possible.
The numbers are there. Tom can win.
Is it realistic?...
Depends...
To: capt. norm
Wasn't talking about values. I was.
Does McClintock more reflect your values and opions or does Schwarzenegger?
To: tallhappy
What makes you think that Bustamante will get less than 40%? Despite the polls, it's impossible for a Democrat to actually get vote totals as low as his. When push comes to shove, the RATs will pull the RAT lever.
To: tallhappy
Is it realistic?
No, it isn't realistic.
44
posted on
09/22/2003 8:02:57 AM PDT
by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
To: chilepepper
He is *NOT* a Republican, since in order to belong to a party you need to become part of a team, and McClintock is *NOT* a team player. A quick review for the more dimwitted among us:
1. McClintock has served the CA GOP for 20 years, while Arnold is a newcomer to the scene.
2. McClintock was in this race first, while Arnold joined late in the game.
3. McClintock's views reflect the GOP platform (remember that old thing?), while Arnold's most assuredly do not.
45
posted on
09/22/2003 8:03:32 AM PDT
by
NittanyLion
(Go Tom Go!)
To: XJarhead
Another dynamic may be that if McClintock started polling well and beating Arnold, some of Arnold's other support -- from Dems and centrists -- may go to Bustamonte I agree. That's why I called it the "silent surprise".
It's almost a stealth campaign.
To: southernnorthcarolina
If McClintock can't win a majority of FReepers...
False premise. This is like Democrats claims that Bush didn't win Florida. Polls close. Polls end. Counting and recounting stops. I'll concede that Free Republic polls are unscientific, but McClintock has won every one of them thus far. He did even better in the one poll where the results for California Freepers were presented...
After the debate who do you support for Governor of California? Results as of Sept 9, 2003 10:00 pm PDT using the state designation on the FR profile pages to breakout California totals:
|
|
California |
Unknown |
Total |
|
McClintock |
174 |
144 |
789 |
|
Schwarzenegger |
89 |
143 |
612 |
|
Other |
2 |
16 |
40 |
|
Undecided |
7 |
15 |
88 |
Free Republic California Gubernatorial Poll
The September 9th California Freeper totals... McClintock 174 = 64% Arnold 89 = 33%
|
47
posted on
09/22/2003 8:05:37 AM PDT
by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: tallhappy
Does McClintock more reflect your values and opions or does Schwarzenegger? I don't vote in California, so my values and opinions don't matter in this fight. But if I did, I would vote for Schwarzenegger.
It's not so much a matter of who I want to be Governor of California next year. Whoever is Governor next year will be inheriting a basket case, with a mandate that will make Bush's narrow victory look like election by acclamation. McClintock would be torn apart in this environment, and would be the only Republican elected Governor of California for a generation.
Schwarzenegger, OTOH, will be forgiven his failures and can get away (rightly) with blaming his predecessor, the Legislature, and everybody else in Sacramento for the problem. He can succeed in moving the center of the debate slightly to the right. Then in a few years, maybe a "true" Republican in the McClintock mold would have a chance to win over the electorate.
Just IMHO. Either McClintock or Schwarzenegger is acceptable to me. But if I got to select the California Governor all by myself, I would choose Schwarzenegger because of all the other things, including the goodwill of the voters, that he brings to the party.
48
posted on
09/22/2003 8:07:19 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(All I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11/01)
To: sinkspur
How wrong you are, but that's nothing new. Do you have a Big Blue Ring also?
49
posted on
09/22/2003 8:08:09 AM PDT
by
Afronaut
(How can you vote for a Liberal?)
To: nina0113
Just one teeny little problem - much of Arnold's support is crossover Democrats who will never, no never, vote for McClintock. Yes.
That is why this is feasible. It keeps Bustamante's numbers low. It is not a problem it is what makes this possible.
To: tallhappy
When Californians are given the choice between Bustamante and McClintock, they choose Bustamante.
For example, consider this pollreleased September 9, 2003. The poll was conducted by Baselice & Associates, Inc., September 1-4, 2003 among 1,005 likely voters. According to the poll commissioned by California Chamber of Commerce:
If both Ueberroth and McClintock drop out, Schwarzenegger will win over Bustamante. If both Schwarzenegger and McClintock drop out, Ueberroth will tie with Bustamante.
If both Schwarzenegger and Ueberroth drop out, McClintock will lose to Bustamante.
California Chamber of Commerce
For which one of the following candidates would you vote if the recall
relection for Governor was
just between the following two candidates?
(Randomize choices)
49% Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican
42% Cruz Bustamante, Democrat
* Other names (vol)
3% Would not vote (vol)
6% Undecided / refused (vol)
__________________________________________________________________________
For which one of the following candidates would you vote if the recall
election for Governor was
just between the following two candidates?
(Randomize choices)
43% Peter Ueberroth, Republican
43% Cruz Bustamante, Democrat
* Other names (vol)
4% Would not vote (vol)
9% Undecided / refused (vol)
_________________________________________________________________________
For which one of the following candidates would you vote if the recall
election for Governor was
just between the following two candidates?
(Randomize choices)
41% Tom McClintock, Republican
47% Cruz Bustamante, Democrat
1% Other names (vol)
3% Would not vote (vol)
8% Undecided / refused (vol)
To: tallhappy
Way too Tall Happy!
Thinking that 60% of the Arnold supporters would switch votes at the zero hour is hopeless. You would need more conviction prior to that.
It seems that you are also underestimating the Arnold voter as if they are all false chad pushers. You need to reconsider that analogy.
Many of Arnold's support comes from the right that finds itself more balanced on social issues. And all this "IF you do not represent the hard right you are not truely a republican" is crap and is dividing the party in my opinion.
Its people like you that will once again cause us to divide and get Mecha Man elected.
And I will hold the likes of you responsible Happy Tall one....
Comment #53 Removed by Moderator
To: Sabertooth
I'll concede that Free Republic polls are unscientific, but McClintock has won every one of them thus far.
Not only unscientific, but they do not even in the slightest reflect the voting demographics of California.
54
posted on
09/22/2003 8:13:08 AM PDT
by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
To: NittanyLion
Your third argument is fine, but your others are silly:
McClintock has served the CA GOP for 20 years, while Arnold is a newcomer to the scene.
Arnold has been a professed Republican for decades. No, he has not been an elected politician, but he has expressed his preference in circumstances when it would have been far easier to claim to be a Democrat or not to say anything. He hasn't been an elected official or "served" like McClintock, but don't make it sound like he joined the GOP last week.
McClintock was in this race first, while Arnold joined late in the game.
This isn't fair either. It was only a couple of days. It's not like Arnold was pulling a Wesley Clark.
To: tallhappy
so, the goal is to feel comfortable with ones beliefs? how egotistical can you get?
i'm sure the followers of Radomiro Tomic here in Chile had twenty years to congratulate themselves on how purely they followed their "beliefs" when they kept the honest centrist Allesandri from winning and split off enough votes to throw the Chilean election to the Marxist Allende. The wounds have still not healed from their "purity of beliefs"
actually, i put my "feelings" in second place. i am more interested in protecting California from the Aztlan movement, and if this means holding my nose while i vote for Ahnold, so be it.
McClintock is a second rate state senator who has allowed himself to be manipulated by America's enemies. This makes him my enemy as well.
Only stupid people allow themselves to be manipulated...
56
posted on
09/22/2003 8:15:51 AM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: tallhappy
My middle of the road co-workers are calling October 7th "Arnold Day". There is no way these folks will vote for McClintock. Many have said they will vote No on recall if it looks like Busta-mencha will win. McClintock is not even on their radar screen.
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
To: Registered
Not only unscientific, but they do not even in the slightest reflect the voting demographics of California.
Agreed, my point was solely to the false premise "If McClintock can't win a majority of FReepers."
|
59
posted on
09/22/2003 8:17:20 AM PDT
by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: tallhappy
It's not going to happen. Your choices are Schwartzenegger or Bustamante.
For years, I voted Libertarian because I believed that I should vote the impossible principle over the possible victory. Bush was the first Republican vote I'd cast since 1980. Even a heel of a loaf is better than no bread at all.
60
posted on
09/22/2003 8:18:14 AM PDT
by
nina0113
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson