Posted on 09/21/2003 2:50:33 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
![]()
|
Wait til you've had freezer burn.
And then there's the ones who die--smugly assuming that cryonics can't possibly work. Let's see, I can either die with no hope whatsoever, or die with some small (non-zero) hope of later reanimation. Which one is the rational choice?
Let's see, I can either die with no hope whatsoever and leave $200K to my kids, or I can die with no hope whatsoever and spend $200K so my head can be cut off and frozen like a popsical.
Your chances of having your body reanimated after having your head cut off and frozen are no greater than your chances of having your body reanimated after having it cremated.
Your DNA might be salvageable after being frozen if someone someday wanted to clone you, but you could find lots of much cheaper ways to preserve your DNA.
What do you expect from Palm Beach County.....??
Franchises available?
Talk about being gullible...
Why not commit suicide right now, and get the money to your kids even sooner? You can spend your money as you choose, of course. No one has any moral obligation to leave a single penny to anyone else, nor does anyone have a right to inherit anything from anyone else. Inheritance is a gift, which must be freely given. To criticise someone for spending money on cryonic suspension is no different than criticizing them for spending money on whatever they choose. Every penny you spend on yourself is a penny you can't will to your beneficiaries. Why not diss old codgers for spending money on medical procedures? After all, they could save that money and have more left in their estates!
Your chances of having your body reanimated after having your head cut off and frozen are no greater than your chances of having your body reanimated after having it cremated.
That's an assertion you can't prove. And the weight of the evidence says otherwise. Tissues and organisms have been reanimated after having been frozen. The same cannot be said of anything that has been cremated.
Your DNA might be salvageable after being frozen if someone someday wanted to clone you, but you could find lots of much cheaper ways to preserve your DNA.
Preservation of DNA is not the issue here. Either cryonics preserves one's identity as a person (within some acceptable tolerance,) so that future technology can reanimate the person, or else it does not. If you have proof that it does not, let's hear it.
Oh, I have. Quite extensively.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.