Skip to comments.
DESPERATE SADDAM OFFERS AMERICANS DEAL
sundaymirror ^
| Sep 21 2003
| Paul Martin In Baghdad
Posted on 09/21/2003 9:56:44 AM PDT by jmstein7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Factual?
1
posted on
09/21/2003 9:56:44 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Factual?See comments here.
2
posted on
09/21/2003 10:01:32 AM PDT
by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: dighton
I agree; let him provide some WMD info (and let the info be confirmed) and some info on the connection between Al-Qaida and Iraq *FIRST*, then deal.
3
posted on
09/21/2003 10:06:20 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
The Iraqi dictator is demanding safe passage to the former Soviet republic of Belarus. In exchange, he has vowed to provide information on weapons of mass destruction and disclose bank accounts where he siphoned off tens of millions of dollars in plundered cash. Bush was right.
4
posted on
09/21/2003 10:07:15 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: jmstein7
He maintained that Saddam had decided to seek a deal "because he is desperate, trapped and finding fewer and fewer people willing to give him shelter." But...but...the democrats said we were losing this war. What's up?
5
posted on
09/21/2003 10:09:36 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
To draw an analogy to Ann Coulter in "Treason", if this turns out to be true, there will be another "Judgment Day" for liberals on the magnitude of the Venona decrypts; but, the media (with Fox News and the internet around) can't simply blackout this one.
This could be the big one.
6
posted on
09/21/2003 10:09:46 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
This could be the big one.The Democrat party - DOA.
7
posted on
09/21/2003 10:11:11 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
Could it be that, knowing this, Bush, et al, has just been pulling the "rope-a-dope" the whole time? I mean, if this turns out to be true, then Bush will have masterfully let the Dems dig themselves into a hole that they cannot dig themselves out of.
And, the icing on the cake would be the recent goading of the libs into coming out and saying that there is no connection between Iraq and Al-Qaida!
8
posted on
09/21/2003 10:12:01 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Leaders within the democrat party, upon hearing the news, are advising the rank and file to hold firm against negotiating with the Baath Socialist party. They cite possible prosecution under US laws governing anti-trust.
Liberal democrats, being socialist themselves, believe it unfair to attack comrades on the left.
Their motto, No Enemies to the Left!
9
posted on
09/21/2003 10:12:18 AM PDT
by
CT
To: jmstein7
I say shoot the tiger!
10
posted on
09/21/2003 10:12:49 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: jmstein7
"But the feeling of obligation gets less and less as time passes and the pressure mounts." Hey Bin Ladin - Are you hearing this?
"Come to us if you want to live."
11
posted on
09/21/2003 10:14:32 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
The libs' downfall will be that they are so damn nearsighted and predictable.
12
posted on
09/21/2003 10:15:27 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
No need for a deal. If taken alive (and IMO, Saddam desperately wants to live), Saddam will talk or suffer.
13
posted on
09/21/2003 10:16:51 AM PDT
by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: jmstein7
Even if we get Saddam, all the Dims will still scream about the costs of the war and crank the din up even louder on demanding why we haven't gotten bin Laden, because Saddam really had nothing to do with 9-11, doncha know?
14
posted on
09/21/2003 10:17:46 AM PDT
by
Gritty
To: dighton
I'll bet even Saddam would take great pleasure in sliming Hans Blix and boasting how easlity he was fooled.
15
posted on
09/21/2003 10:17:55 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: Gritty
Until Saddam confirms a connection between Iraq and Al-Qaida -- which seems likely.
16
posted on
09/21/2003 10:18:33 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
SADDAM Hussein has been in secret negotiations with US forces in Iraq for the past nine days, we can reveal. Here's the deal. Since Uday and Qusay have already "purchased" their burial plots, Saddam gets his free! Make room for daddy, boys!
To: jmstein7
Could it be that, knowing this, Bush, et al, has just been pulling the "rope-a-dope" the whole time? I wouldn't want to bet my life in a game of chess with him.
The overly emotional liberals are easy to excite, while Bush sits back and feeds their adrenalin buzz by saying nothing. All the while pondering and savoring his success.
I think I'll buy a nice bottle of ...ahem...American wine , and hold it for the comming news reports. Maybe some American cheese for a snack.
18
posted on
09/21/2003 10:20:10 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: concerned about politics
I can just imagine the campaign commercials that the RNC would be able to put out next year!
Ooohhhhhhh... if a filibuster proof majority was ever in our grasp. . . this could be the catalyst!!!
Let's keep our fingers crossed, boys!
19
posted on
09/21/2003 10:22:40 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
I'm sorry folks the Mirror is not the most reliable news source around. And it's certainly hard to imagine that they'd be the one's to break this story. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't buy this story.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson