Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/20/2003 3:34:35 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

2 posted on 09/20/2003 3:35:33 PM PDT by Pokey78 ("I thought this country was founded on a principle of progressive taxation." Wesley Clark to Russert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
He is a handsome man in an unnerving kind of way.

The hits just keep on comin'!

3 posted on 09/20/2003 3:40:03 PM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
>>Howard Dean, the loopy peacenik <<


That's too funny!
4 posted on 09/20/2003 3:42:15 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I got "Treason" from the Library today-was bought 9/3- Think libs are ruling the book list?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Ross Perot is back, and cuts a dashing figure in his uniform.
5 posted on 09/20/2003 3:44:07 PM PDT by Imal (The deadliest weapon is patience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Good post. You forget the details of Kosovo without reminders from time to time.
7 posted on 09/20/2003 3:56:01 PM PDT by jwalburg (You're not moderate just because you know leftier leftists than yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Unless, of course, there's a third scenario,... Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uh, Oh.

As usual with Steyn, when he homes in on you - the jig is up!

8 posted on 09/20/2003 3:57:20 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
General Clark is merely an unwitting "stalking horse", designed to weaken both Dean and Bush just enough to enable the Democrats' real white knight to jump in: waiting in the wings, Hillary Rodham Clinton

How about that? Mark Steyn agrees with me!

BEHOLD THE "WHITE "KNIGHT!"


9 posted on 09/20/2003 3:57:34 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Serving You... on Operation Noble Eagle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
My mom and I were talking about this phenom - the liberals do not know what they believe - and they always say either they have to consult with staff or with the people.

I have noted, that Tom McClintock has NEVER - EVER - ONE TIME said any such drivel. Tom came out of the shoot - saying only one thing - I HAVE A PLAN TO TAKE CA BACK TO THE GREAT STATE IT USED TO BE. He didn't ask for approval from anyone - he already knew what he believed - and he believed what he knew was the right thing to do.
12 posted on 09/20/2003 4:06:07 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
This analysis of Clark is spot on. If the dems are counting on him to show Iraq to be a 'miserable failure' then they've chosen a pot to attack a kettle.
21 posted on 09/20/2003 4:24:37 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
It is hard to argue that Iraq was a disaster when, in the crappy little war you, General Clark, presided over, the most powerful military on the planet took 78 days of aerial bombardment to destroy just over a dozen tanks

ROFL bump

26 posted on 09/20/2003 4:29:45 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
General Clark is a leader, ready to take the nation somewhere once he figures out where it is he wants to lead us to. That really inspires confidence! < /sarcasm>
27 posted on 09/20/2003 4:33:09 PM PDT by gitmo (Zero Tolerance = Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
As he told The New York Times when asked whether he'd have voted to authorise war or not: "I think that's too simple a question."

BWAHAHAHA!!!

29 posted on 09/20/2003 4:40:58 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
BREAKING: CLARK POLICY STATEMENT RELEASED
"All is well... and all will be well... in the garden."

31 posted on 09/20/2003 4:49:42 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Alas, Hillie is NOT the white knight. She will not waddle over the hill at the key moment to rescue the dems because there are too many variables with negative potential. If the economy booms into the first half of next year, the dems are lost on domestic economic issues. If Bush marches Saddam or OBL or both out into a press conference at the point of his .45, the dems are toast.

No, the white knight in 2004 will be PanderAl Gore. He will run and he will lose, but he will clear the field for Hillie in 2008. We know Cheney will not run in 2008, so it will be Hillie against a new guy, inexperienced and untested. Who will oppose Hillie in 2008? Who will it be? My bet is that Rudi will replace Cheney on the 2004 ticket and run for president in 2008. It won't be Powell but it might be Condi.

No Hillie, but Gore for the slimey sleaze in 2004!

32 posted on 09/20/2003 4:54:42 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78; dighton; general_re
the Kollossus of Kosovo

A keeper!

33 posted on 09/20/2003 5:02:38 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Unless, of course, there's a third scenario, which, given last week's lamentable performance, makes a strange kind of sense. General Clark is merely an unwitting "stalking horse", designed to weaken both Dean and Bush just enough to enable the Democrats' real white knight to jump in: waiting in the wings, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Yep.

39 posted on 09/20/2003 5:21:59 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Glad I'm not the only one who noticed the creep doesn't blink. So, are we looking at a Dean/Clark ticket to go up in flames next year? Wonder what their theme song will be. Cake's "He's Going The Distance.... He's going for speed...." (but long ago somebody left with the cup).
40 posted on 09/20/2003 5:22:56 PM PDT by wizardoz (Bomb France.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
enable the Democrats' real white knight to jump in: waiting in the wings, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

It truly baffles me how anyone could consider this woman qualified to be presidential candidate. Her only qualifications are being first lady (to a failure of a president who's only legacy is Monica and to whom she stuck by thicker than Tammy Wynette could ever have imagined) and a partial term as carpet-bagging senator from loopy New York.

It blows my mind.

42 posted on 09/20/2003 5:25:45 PM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scholar; Bullish; linear; yoda swings
Ping
49 posted on 09/20/2003 5:37:45 PM PDT by knighthawk (We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Clark will have to answer for his incompetence to HHQ (Hillary Headquarters). He's not carrying out his marching orders.
50 posted on 09/20/2003 5:41:06 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (There are two certainties. Death and Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson