Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where did the President and his Grandparents get their money?
Vanity | 9/20/03 | Vainty

Posted on 09/20/2003 1:52:33 PM PDT by Theyknow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last
To: Theyknow
"I am serious i need some help.



Tell them like i told my son-in-law they worked for it.And if you expect to have any your going to have to work and he fainted.
121 posted on 09/21/2003 2:08:18 PM PDT by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Is wasn't a poem and poem's don't have to rhyme.
122 posted on 09/21/2003 4:15:53 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Diverdogz
Harrison told less lies (but used more Kleenex).
123 posted on 09/21/2003 4:22:02 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
...on a path that will make them richer than Midas

Wow! So all the White House sinks are made of GOLD!

124 posted on 09/21/2003 4:24:05 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
His medical residency, aportion of which was served with Planned Parenthood, is also being kept very low key...he supposedly doesn't want to discuss that as well. He may actually be our first abortionist major party cadidate.

Wow. I did not know that. Wherever voters fall on the abortion issue, you have to wonder about a President who has actually PERFORMED many HIMSELF. Good L-rd. Is he the same one who dissected pet cats? He could run on the Jeffrey Dahmer ticket.

125 posted on 09/21/2003 4:26:51 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Theyknow
Teach your son to do the research by himself. Take him to library to check out books by both anti-Bush biographers and pro-Bush biographers (most of the trustworthy information is not available in the Internet), teach him to research magazine articles, and finally, show him to use the Internet

Give a person a fish, and he will be fed for a day.

Teach a person to fish, and he will be fed for a lifetime.

Seize a teaching moment.
126 posted on 09/21/2003 4:28:04 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theyknow
Here's a Straight Dope column ont his subject.
127 posted on 09/21/2003 5:13:42 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee; lonestar; Ready4Freddy
It seems to a level we agree. I have never tried to imply that what GWB did was illegal. Obviously, it was perfectly legal. I just firmly believe that it doesn't coincide with the conservative values we wish he espouses. I have always been a strong conservative and my father has told me many times that it easy to be conservative when I benefit by being so. The challenge is to remain true to my beliefs when I do not benefit. In GWB's case, he appears to be conservative in rhetoric and in certain battles that he has waged, but he definitely abandoned his conservatism when he was able to benefit through the stadium deal.

You know ... I am always pissed when liberals defend liberals no matter what. For instance, Clinton on the lying under oath. McDermott bashing the US in Iraq. I really wish that we conservatives did not defend Republicans no matter what. GWB is definitely better than all of his democrat opponents. I will definitely be voting for him in the next election. This being said, I definitely think that although what he did with the stadium was legal, it was wrong; and although I can defend what he did from the legal perspective, I remain firm in my opposition to it. And d*mn it, I wish more conservatives here wouldn't feel guilty admitting the same.

128 posted on 09/21/2003 10:12:24 PM PDT by undeniable logic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: undeniable logic
I'm not trying to make excuses for George W. Bush and his dealings with the Texas Rangers. I am dismissing some of the reported details as false (when the selloff figure is anywhere between $10 and $50 million dollars, there is a lot of exageration going on). In 3 years or 30 years, the land becomes "private owned". Well, we are long past 3 years since that stadium was built, is it in private hands now?

Civic stadiums are always a questionable deal. I don't understand why the new football stadium reportedly only cost $260+million (somewhere under $300million) yet Reliant Energy paid $300million for the naming rights. Why didn't they just build a stadium? And why does the team owner get paid (on an installment plan) instead of the city that owns the building?

I don't offer this out there as a defense. I'm saying that some of what is rumored is not always true. I also know that the number of privately owned stadiums is virtually nil. Can one partial team owner buck the trend and build a private owned stadium when the team already has a publicly owned stadium? That would be difficult to sell to the investors (especially when they know that they could move the team to another town that would pay to build them a stadium).

129 posted on 09/21/2003 10:26:14 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: weegee
TBA will be conveyed to the owners in 2006. Club is paying $5 mil / yr rent & maintenance, and the payments are applied toward the 'purchase price' of $60 mil (some ~$110 mil less than the cost to build). Since the rent & maint payments are SOP, the conveyance will be, in effect, an outright giveaway.

After that, the sales tax bump will still be in effect, and payments on the construction bonds will still need to be made on a property that the public no longer owns.

130 posted on 09/22/2003 4:54:09 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
The rent on the Astrodomain (Astrodome and surrounding complex I belive was included) was a nominal figure of $1. That property was rented to the owner of the Houston Astros (and it was still under contract to the team owner when the new baseball field was built miles away from the property).

This goes back over 35 years in team history to the way things were done. Maintenance was a part of that agreement, but guess what, the team owner did not hold up his part of the bargain and the locals had to pay millions in repairs.

How is the Arlington deal different than other cities?

131 posted on 09/22/2003 12:37:18 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"How is the Arlington deal different than other cities?"

The owners of the Rangers will own the stadium, and several hundred acres of prime real estate, lock, stock, and barrel (or, if you prefer, in fee simple :) after 12 years of 'rent to own' payments that will total ~40-45% of what the stadium cost the taxpayers to build. That is highly unusual.

Harris County still owns the Astrodome complex, IIRC.

132 posted on 09/22/2003 1:27:03 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller; Theyknow
What Prescot Bush and other companies did in the forties is no different than what today's companies have been doing, especially since 1993, that is, moving to China and other slave labor, less-than-savory nations. We are helping their economies at the expense of our own, at least presently. Hopefully, down the road there is a pay off, providing displaced workers get retrained and educated and the beat goes on......Otherwise, China will be able to kick our butts with our own money.
133 posted on 09/22/2003 1:37:32 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: RonHolzwarth
We have had only two HONEST presidents, in my opinion. Abraham Lincoln and Herbert Hoover.

Andrew Jackson

134 posted on 09/22/2003 1:51:37 PM PDT by Orbiting_Rosie's_Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fzob
Prescott Bush made his money as an investment banker in Connecticut. Only after he was a successful banker did he enter politics. He won a special election in 1952 to finish the term of James McMahon who died in office. He then ran and won re-election to another full term. Afterwards he went back to banking.

Yes, 10 years of his life spent in politics and he was a lifelong politician, wasn't he?

135 posted on 09/22/2003 2:07:03 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson