Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moon Brings Novel Green Power to Arctic Homes
Yahoo Science News-(Reuters) ^ | September 20, 2003 | Alister Doyle

Posted on 09/20/2003 12:07:02 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou

OSLO (Reuters) - Homes on the Arctic tip of Norway started getting power from the moon on Saturday via a unique subsea power station driven by the rise and fall of the tide.

A tidal current in a sea channel near the town of Hammerfest, caused by the gravitational tug of the moon on the earth, started turning the 10-meter (33 ft) blades of a turbine bolted to the seabed to generate electricity for the local grid.

The prototype looks like an underwater windmill and is expected to generate about 700,000 kilowatt hours of non-polluting energy a year, or enough to light and heat about 30 homes.

"This is the first time in the world that electricity from a tidal current has been fed into a power grid," Harald Johansen, managing director of Hammerfest Stroem which has led the project, told Reuters.

The plant in the Kvalsund channel, which had cost about 80 million crowns ($11 million) by Saturday's launch, is a tiny contributor to help cut dependence on fossil fuels like oil and gas blamed for global warming (news - web sites).

The water flows at about 2.5 meters (8 ft) per second for about 12 hours when the tide is rising through the Kvalsund channel, pauses at high tide and then reverses direction. The blades on the turbine automatically turn to face the current.

If successful, the project could herald far wider use of predictable tides in green energy and generate millions of dollars in orders. Windmills, by contrast, are useless in calm weather and have to be built to withstand hurricane-force winds.

ARTIFICIAL LAGOONS

Tides have previously been tapped for power plants in France, Canada and Russia in barrages that trap water in artificial lagoons at high tide. When the tide goes out, gravity sucks the water through turbines to generate electricity.

But such barrages can disrupt the habitats of animals and plants in river estuaries and along the coasts.

Proponents of turbines turned by tidal currents say that they cause less impact -- they are silent and invisible from the surface and fish, whales and seals can probably swim round them without the risk of being sliced up.

Drawbacks are that costs are high. Hammerfest Stroem has estimated that electricity will cost about 0.30-0.35 crowns a Kilowatt hour to generate, three times that of typical hydro-generated electricity in Norway.

And maintenance -- with divers having to go down to the seabed -- could be tricky. Other subsea experiments to generate power from tidal currents from Australia to Britain have not got to the stage of feeding power into the grid.

Norwegian oil group Statoil, Swiss-Swedish engineering group ABB and local Norwegian utilities are partners in the Hammerfest Stroem scheme. "We want to get experience from this and see that we can also be a producer of green electricity," said Hanne Lekva at Statoil.

($1=7.223 Norwegian Crown)



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: alternateenergy; energy; moonpower; norway; tides
Underwater windmills...errrrr...fish slicers.;-)
1 posted on 09/20/2003 12:07:02 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Don't worry, the greens will always find something to object to until they reduce us all to starvation level hunter gatherers in loincloths again. They are not pro-environment...they are anti-human.
2 posted on 09/20/2003 12:12:02 PM PDT by blanknoone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Twenty-five cents per KWH is not exactly competitive with common sources of electricity.
3 posted on 09/20/2003 12:37:58 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Hence the use of the term "Novel Green Power".
4 posted on 09/20/2003 1:01:22 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
They are 'Regressives'.
5 posted on 09/20/2003 1:05:47 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Drawbacks are that costs are high. Hammerfest Stroem has estimated that electricity will cost about 0.30-0.35 crowns a Kilowatt hour to generate, three times that of typical hydro-generated electricity in Norway.

($1=7.223 Norwegian Crown)

Meaning that electricity costs $.15 * .3 = $.045/kwh. Which ain't that bad, considering that Gray Davis is paying $1500/kwh.

6 posted on 09/20/2003 1:07:01 PM PDT by JoeSchem (Which way is Arnold's political weather vane pointing today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
"...cost eleven million dollars ... to supply 30 homes..."
- - -
Thats over $350,000 PER HOME just in capital costs.
7 posted on 09/20/2003 1:10:10 PM PDT by DefCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Put a dang screen on the front of the blade assembly and no animals get sucked in .... problem solved.

Of course the water flow dynamics will be disturbed a little but it should not affect the total flow through the turbines.

8 posted on 09/20/2003 1:14:25 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam : totalitarian political ideology / meme cloaked under the cover of religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson