To: areafiftyone
Tom Daschle is saddened, deeply saddened.
2 posted on
09/20/2003 9:42:29 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: areafiftyone
Woohoo!
16 posted on
09/20/2003 10:47:04 AM PDT by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: areafiftyone
Am I supposed to understand all those numbers? Numbers give me a headache. All I know is that what the democrat presidential candidates are doing ISN'T WORKING!! Yahoo! Go, Bush.
20 posted on
09/20/2003 11:20:43 AM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: areafiftyone
Thank you for posting these. For all who review these statistics, keep in mind that a 55-45 split in a presidential election produces a "landslide" result. Think Johnson over Goldwater; think Reagan over Carter; think Mondale; think Dukakis.
Unless President Bush screws up in some major way between now and then, he wins by a landslide in the election of 2004, REGARDLESS of his opponent in that election.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "An Open Letter to Howard Dean," discussion thread on FR. Article is also on ChronWatch.
21 posted on
09/20/2003 11:25:09 AM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: areafiftyone
although the concern over jobs is very serious in my opinion, I expect another bump when 401K statements close and are issued after 9/30.
To: areafiftyone
Nice work!
31 posted on
09/20/2003 2:37:36 PM PDT by
Bob J
To: areafiftyone
Now, if he would just do something to excite his base.
To: areafiftyone
I have never seen a president's supporters more obsessed with approval ratings than with this one. I thought the mindless Klinton groupies were bad about it.
I've always maintained that Bush's support is very thin, at least for the last 2 years. Basically, all this "support" is a result of the post-9/11 tramua experienced by the sheeple. Once the democrats rally behind their candidate (whom I believe will be Hitlery), his support will continue to erode further, IMHO.
If, on the other hand, I'm wrong, then the question becomes why isn't he advancing a conservative agenda if he is so popular?
If the Republican party isn't capable of pursuing an agressive limited-gov't agenda when they control both houses of congress, and have a popular president, when will they support a limited-gov't agenda?
50 posted on
09/20/2003 8:10:02 PM PDT by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: areafiftyone
If there were more jobs he would be 15% higher.
To: *Election President; *Public_Opinion_List
bump for bump lists
62 posted on
09/20/2003 8:54:48 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: areafiftyone
Hopefully he's found a bottom somewhere in the low 50s. I'm not done worrying yet though. I'm not sure the rope-a-dope thing can be called a success this time around. The anti-war left has seized control of the narrative and getting back is going to take a lot of work and a good meassure of luck.
But I was saying the same thing a year ago, so we'll see.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson