Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strela
What is required to win is to present a candidate for whom more people will vote than the other guys. And McWampum simply doesn't qualify. Arnold Schwarzenegger does.

What you are describing is a beauty contest, since BOTH SIDES in your version (SchwarzenKennedy and BustaMEChA) are exactly the same on positions, support, and ideas.

Where is the SUBSTANCE to vote on? Do I have to post again the differnt position that SchwarzenKennedy and McClintock actually have, and how SchwarzenKennedy and BustaMEChA/Davis are more alike than dislike?

Or would you just ignore that and let out the RINO mating cry "But he can Wiiiin!"?

220 posted on 09/20/2003 1:04:15 PM PDT by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: Itzlzha
since BOTH SIDES in your version (SchwarzenKennedy and BustaMEChA) are exactly the same on positions, support, and ideas.

What is your motive for posting here? It certainly isn't to present credible arguments, obviously.

226 posted on 09/20/2003 1:24:20 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson