[PhiKapMom]

Better stop and think before making a wild accusation about who is the Liberal. Ask yourself -- which candidate is on the same side as Cruz who is as liberal as they come?

The answer to that is the man you are supporting who cannot seem to get a sound of his mouth that would in some way attack Cruz or Davis. Instead the only sound that comes out is his attacks on Arnold.

Getting more obvious by the day that McC and his supporters would rather keep spinning -- "principled" and "conservative" cannot not be used to describe McC ever again! Selling out to Cruz and Indian Gambling Interest is something a "principled conservative" would not do.

You and the rest of the McC fan club can write all you want about Arnold being a liberal, etc., but facts speak for themselves. The credibility of the McC folks along with their hero, McC, with their spin like the Clintonites is zero right now with me! Arnold attacks Davis/Cruz and McC sides with Cruz against Arnold!

Doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out who is the "Real" Republican and who is the "RINO!" All of you folks were wrong about the title "RINO" -- that title doesn't go to Arnold and his supporters who stand up for the Republican Party of CA and want to win this Recall. The title RINO goes to McC who has now teamed up with the RAT Cruz against Arnold, the Republican in the race!

You all should be really proud of yourselves and your candidate! Next time you start attacking the rest of us better check out your candidate's credentials. Being a social conservative doesn't mean that he is the right person for the job. In fact, with what is going on I would have to see in black and white just what kind of a "social" conservative he is now!

[Maelstrom]

"Better stop and think before making a wild accusation about who is the Liberal. Ask yourself -- which candidate is on the same side as Cruz who is as liberal as they come?"

Depending on the issue, Cruz and Arnold agree about far more consequential policies than Cruz and McClintock.

Them's the facts.

I'll tell you what a principled conservative would not do...he wouldn't give money to Kennedy's campaign. He wouldn't appoint Buffet as an economic advisor, nor Robert Kennedy, Jr. for ecological concerns.

Yes...there is one liberal Republican in the race. Which has been the conservatives' point all along.

So why again are we supposed to vote for him?

[Maelstrom]

OH...and as for your labelling of McClintock as some sort of "super conservative"...that is the claim of Arnold supporters, not conservatives.

Conservatives vew him as an acceptable compromise everyone should be able to agree upon, not some fire-breathing super-conservative.

Issa, McClintock, Simon...any of them were acceptible. Simon a bit less so than the other two. Conservatives aren't Arnold worshippers. We require reasons to vote for a candidate. "He can win" justifies a support for Clinton if only he were a Republican.

[Wolfstar]

Perhaps it's only my perception, but it sure seems to me that the number of virulent pro-McClintock posts is diminishing. Perhaps well-reasoned arguments such as yours and others are getting through. We can hope, anyway.