Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forty fighters held in Iraq after US troops killed
Reuters | 9/19/03 | Rosalind Russell

Posted on 09/19/2003 3:29:19 AM PDT by kattracks

TIKRIT, Iraq, Sept 19 (Reuters) - U.S. forces captured 40 suspected Iraqi guerrillas in a night-long battle near Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit after three U.S. soldiers were killed in an ambush, a U.S. commander said on Friday.

Backed by attack helicopters, U.S. troops battled guerrillas until first light after the 4th Infantry Division soldiers were ambushed and killed in part of a series of coordinated attacks east and west of the Tigris river late on Thursday.

Colonel James Hickey said U.S. forces encircled an area of farmland on the east side of the river near Tikrit and captured 40 suspected Iraqi fighters.

"We were involved in direct firefights throughout the night," said Hickey. "We feel confident we now have under our control the individuals who attacked our patrol."

The ambush brought to 76 the number of U.S. soldiers killed in guerrilla attacks since major combat operations were declared over on May 1 after the U.S.-led invasion which ousted Saddam.

It was one of the deadliest attacks on U.S. soldiers which have been concentrated in the so-called "Sunni Triangle," the heartland of support for Saddam which stretches west from Baghdad and north to Tikrit.

Two U.S. soldiers wounded in the ambush were raced in the back of a Humvee all-terrain vehicle to Saddam's former palace in Tikrit, now an American military base. They were taken on stretchers to a field hospital, leaving pools of blood in the back of the vehicle.

The fighting began at 8 p.m. (1600 GMT) when assailants in a pick-up truck fired on a U.S. infantry unit south of Tikrit which responded with mortar and heavy machinegun fire.

At the same time, a U.S. army camp nearby came under attack and returned fire. Hickey said the apparent coordination of the attacks marked a change in tactics for the anti-American fighters whose attacks in the past have appeared to be spontaneous or opportunistic.

"It seemed to be coordinated," he told reporters. "We saw action from the west and east side of Tikrit. That is unusual."

But Hickey denied anti-American resistance was on the increase, saying there had been a fall-off in attacks in the Tikrit area in recent weeks.

"This is a handful of rearguards attempting to maintain a degree of political relevance here," Hickey said. "They will not succeed."

(Editing by Diana Abdallah)

09/19/03 05:46 ET



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdadrose; captured; clymer; guerillas; iraq; iraqaftermath; iraqirose; jihadis; mediabias; reuters; rosalindrussell; russell; terrorists; tikrit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2003 3:29:19 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We should not be capturing guerillas. We need to finish them off in battle, both to discourage other Jihadis and to allow them to enjoy full freedom of worship by enabling them to go and meet Allah.

Now we have 40 future terrorists on our hands.
2 posted on 09/19/2003 3:41:09 AM PDT by exit82 (Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
We need to outsource running POW camps for these types to the Kurds.
3 posted on 09/19/2003 3:48:24 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Two U.S. soldiers wounded in the ambush were raced in the back of a Humvee all-terrain vehicle to Saddam's former palace in Tikrit, now an American military base. They were taken on stretchers to a field hospital, leaving pools of blood in the back of the vehicle.

If you listen carefully, you can hear the champagne popping at Reuters.

4 posted on 09/19/2003 3:49:23 AM PDT by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Exactly right. The instant I rread that first line, "U.S. forces captured 40 suspected Iraqi guerrillas in a night-long battle..." I wondered why it didn't say 'U.S. forces kill 40 suspected Iraqi guerrilla...'

How do they expect to discourage these ambushes with this wishy washy response? How do they even expect these same 40 from doing the same unless they're held permanently?

5 posted on 09/19/2003 4:04:46 AM PDT by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jaykay

Believe me, plenty of people who needed killin' were killed.

Notice that the Americans didn't leave the scene of the ambush in order to secure the column, but immediately counterattacked and killed bad guys, while capturing 40 others for interrogation.

No more attacking with impunity. The concept of agressive infantry tactics has taken hold in the Sunni heartland. All to the good.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

6 posted on 09/19/2003 4:08:41 AM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Hopefully we are going to get information from them.
7 posted on 09/19/2003 4:14:38 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace ((the original))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
To quote Ann Coulter:"Hey – does anyone know when Bush declared major combat operations had ended? Because I think there may have been one article in the sports section of the Times last week that didn't mention it. The Times is even taking shots at the war in the Arts section, stating authoritatively in a recent movie review: "And with the war in Iraq threatening to turn into a Vietnam-like quagmire ..." (How about getting some decent, impartial reporters embedded at the Times?)

Everone of these rags mention May 1st.

8 posted on 09/19/2003 4:22:22 AM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So ( Have you noticed the dems look like dwarfs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
We should not be capturing guerillas.

Information. Getting information out of these types is very important.

9 posted on 09/19/2003 4:23:49 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exit82
We are getting good info from those captured, which helps track down others.

10 posted on 09/19/2003 4:24:59 AM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Roslind Russell was an unembeded reporter during the start of the war, stationed in Iraq.

Her earlier work included stories on the death of a family by an American JDAM in the early stages of the war, with her friend Baghdad Bob providing comedy relief.

She has also written stories for the BBS (which should tell you something).

Further, she wrote a story earlier entitled "What Liberation? Iraqi Women Pay the Price of War." (how nice of her).

You can also find some work covering Ethiopia from the 90s (who would have guessed that?).

When in the souther town of Basra during the early stages of the war, THIS is the quote that she chose to include in her hit piece.

There is fighting in the center, on the streets. It is terrible," said Hussein, a 24-year-old engineer who works for the state-run oil company in Basra. "We don't want Americans here. This is Iraq."

Rosalind is a stooge for enemy forces with a clear history of bias, and reporting from an anti-American perspective.

Somebody in CentCOM (hello) should examine her press credentials.

Take a look at her debates with BBC Fellows regarding war coverage. She has an agenda.

11 posted on 09/19/2003 4:25:16 AM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
BBS=BBC but who can tell the difference. sorry for the typos. My keyboard is slower than my brain.
12 posted on 09/19/2003 4:26:39 AM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: section9
Sounds good, but no mention of enemies killed in the article...
Hope you're right though.
13 posted on 09/19/2003 4:39:31 AM PDT by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
I have argued for years that there should be an FR "journalists Hall of Shame". There should exist a deposit where future historians can review the execrable coverage of the War on Terror.

Russell would rank high on the list of journalists who would be pleased to see America "humbled" in Iraq.

14 posted on 09/19/2003 4:42:27 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jaykay
How do they expect to discourage these ambushes with this wishy washy response?

I'm certainly glad you know exactly what went on. You might want to ask one of the troops involved that very question. Hope you have a good dental plan.

15 posted on 09/19/2003 5:22:01 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: exit82
That is oh, so true. It is Stupid to keep capturing and releasing these killers just to have them do it again. Their sense of meercy and second chances does not exist.
16 posted on 09/19/2003 5:24:59 AM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
I'm guessing of course, but those troops you mentioned are not who I would ask, but rather their superiors who's demands for restraint hamper their ability to fight back.
17 posted on 09/19/2003 5:53:18 AM PDT by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Is that really what happens to these prisoners? I keep wondering what we do with this terrorists and Fadayeen murderers when we capture them.
18 posted on 09/19/2003 6:12:35 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Coop; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Good news. Thanks, kattracks. Our guys are not messing around.

If the terrorist-appeasers knew how many bad guys our troops were taking out regularly, we'd have more human shields to plow through and lies to debunk. Who needs it. Our military has enough to do without babysitting.

Colonel James Hickey said U.S. forces encircled an area of farmland on the east side of the river near Tikrit and captured 40 suspected Iraqi fighters.

"We were involved in direct firefights throughout the night," said Hickey. "We feel confident we now have under our control the individuals who attacked our patrol."

 Thanks, Tonkin!

If you want on or off my PRO-coalition ping list, please Freepmail me. Warning: it is a high volume ping list on good days. (Most days are good days).

19 posted on 09/19/2003 6:33:18 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("Don't they care about the Iraqi people..at all?"~Sama in Iraq re. those pushing US to leave, 9/17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Now we have 40 future terrorists on our hands.

We have 40 very nice intel sources on our hands.

20 posted on 09/19/2003 6:36:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson