[hermes509]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/965068/posts

We've already covered this Weekly Standard article almost a month ago. It was useless then and its useless now. It doesn't hold up. If you like to use lies to smear the man then go ahead. George Will fell into this trap too in one of his Wash Post articles. He even claimed there wasn't a middle East think tank in Canada.

You can make anyone look bad by taking quotes out of context. I blame Hannity, after watching the show and seeing how he handled it, for dropping the ball when he had a chance to pin the general into a corner. And the Weekly Standard put Hannity's words out of context in that article too. These guys are just sloppy and take away our credibility.

[arasina]

We've already covered this Weekly Standard article almost a month ago.

hermes509
Since Aug 16, 2003

Then who's the WE('ve) that's already covered this about a month ago, Mr. Frenchname?

[AHerald]

We've already covered this Weekly Standard article almost a month ago. It was useless then and its useless now.

Who's "we," kimosabe? I checked that thread you posted and it was pretty much you and one other NewFreeperWhoSuddenly AppearsAndClaimstoBeConservativeDefenderOfWesleyClark defender found the article "useless." Pretty pathetic when you start pointing to your own posts as evidence of how "we've" already covered an issue.

PS At least GoOrdnance makes a good go at posing as just another regular joe freeper. You, on the other hand, are about as transparent as Sharon Stone's panties.