Who's "we," kimosabe? I checked that thread you posted and it was pretty much you and one other NewFreeperWhoSuddenly AppearsAndClaimstoBeConservativeDefenderOfWesleyClark defender found the article "useless." Pretty pathetic when you start pointing to your own posts as evidence of how "we've" already covered an issue.
PS At least GoOrdnance makes a good go at posing as just another regular joe freeper. You, on the other hand, are about as transparent as Sharon Stone's panties.
"We" refers to the members of this community. In this particular case, the ones who posted the Weekly Standard article last month. I didn't realize "we" could be twisted in the way you seem to be trying to twist it. Next time I will try to be more specific realizing that I'm either dealing with some liberals who are trying to sabotage my efforts to get at the truth or just some plain old crazy paranoids.
Those who read my old post without paranoia will see I was looking for a little guidance, didn't get it then and now all the sudden I'm the bad guy. Was the word "useless" too strong? Well, sorry it’s the truth. I guess its fine for generating a little excitement here where the word "We" becomes a Clark defending conspiracy.
Excuse me if I have to deal with people who pick up on these things and just laugh their asses off at how stupid conservatives are and how they twist things out of context and a whole bunch of other slanders. But, maybe they just are talking about people like you because I'm trying to get some facts and a good argument here and I keep getting people responding with the same old error of taking things out of context and now accusing me of being transparent.
Where oh where does a conservative go to get real logical arguments to convert the majority of independents and moderate liberals? And you got to face the facts, the guy appeals to the middle. I obviously picked the wrong place and I have the feeling that maybe there are just a bunch of DUers here putting down mindless comments and accusing those of us who would dig deeper and have all the facts at our disposal for real live arguments of being transparent.
Well, I guess I will end it here. I'm not getting anything I haven't already gotten and it just seems to breed more ad hominen attacks. I don't need to waste any more time. So you win -- you are so right and I'm so wrong and such a transparent Clark defender :->. Makes me wonder how anyone can ever ask serious and tough question here.
Adios Tonto. You shall never hear from the Lone Ranger again as he seeks greener pastures and deeper conservative minds.