Skip to comments.
Clark-Hillary 2004? A winning ticket.
National Review Online ^
| Sept. 18, 2003
| Peter Augustine Lawler
Posted on 09/18/2003 6:32:50 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
This deserves a semi-barf alert, but I decided to withhold. I think he actually has the strategy and logic about right, especially the "appeal of Dean" to "Bobos" and how Clark could be the top alternative.
Where he is wrong is: if Clark is leading and Bush looks vulnerable, you can count on the Old Witch stepping in to take the top slot -- I wouldn't be surprised if Clark steps up and ASKS her to take it with him settling for the VP slot. This has Clintonism written all over it.
To: ReleaseTheHounds
2
posted on
09/18/2003 6:34:15 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(This is my tagline, this is my gun. One is for FReeping, one is for fun.)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
For the last couple of months I have predicted that Hillary will run with Clark as her VP. I stand by that prediction.
3
posted on
09/18/2003 6:35:08 AM PDT
by
sheltonmac
(The difference? One party believes in big government; the other party has a jackass for a mascot)
To: CholeraJoe
CJ: Wow! Quick reply! I like your barf-bag... and your tagline. Reminds me of Fort Jackson!
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Someone at NRO has been reading FR threads . . . . .
5
posted on
09/18/2003 6:36:16 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(You may disagree with me, but I will fight for your right to be in error.)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
B-B-B-But Clark is our hero.
He's a leader! (with this bunch, it doesn't take much)
He is going to save the Democratic party. (for Hillary)
sarcasm /off
6
posted on
09/18/2003 6:37:17 AM PDT
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: sheltonmac
Yes, it makes sense. Why do so many posters here insist that she will not run or that she will not be a VP candidate?
7
posted on
09/18/2003 6:37:58 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: ReleaseTheHounds
The barf bag graphic has served me well. Anyone who hasn't been through military basic (Or seen Full Metal Jacket) will look at my tagline and go, "Huh?"
8
posted on
09/18/2003 6:38:38 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(This is my tagline, this is my gun. One is for FReeping, one is for fun.)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Why would the senator give up her all the influence that comes from having a safe seat from one of our largest states? Because Guiliani is rumored to be running for her senate seat in 06. A senate loss in 06 to Rudy would dash her presidential hopes.
9
posted on
09/18/2003 6:38:59 AM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Consort
"Why do so many posters here insist that she will not run or that she will not be a VP candidate?"
Because the idea is the silly notion of those still addled by the Clintons 3 years after Slick left office. Hillary is an extremely polarizing figure who would sink the Democrat ticket in a year they have a good chance of winning.
To: CholeraJoe
Someone (I forget who) is using: "This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine."
11
posted on
09/18/2003 6:42:43 AM PDT
by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: staytrue
Because Guiliani is rumored to be running for her senate seat in 06. A senate loss in 06 to Rudy would dash her presidential hopes. Bingo.
12
posted on
09/18/2003 6:44:46 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(You may disagree with me, but I will fight for your right to be in error.)
To: Consort
Why do so many posters here insist that she will not run or that she will not be a VP candidate?I believe she'll run, as long as she's assessed that Bush is beatable. However, Hillary Broadass Clinton will not run as VP. It's not in her nature. (Unless the presidential candidate is terminally ill, with only months to live.)
To: WarrenGamaliel
Didn't they say about the same thing when she was running for Senator?
14
posted on
09/18/2003 6:46:22 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: PBRSTREETGANG
"I believe she'll run, as long as she's assessed that Bush is beatable. However, Hillary Broadass Clinton will not run as VP. It's not in her nature. (Unless the presidential candidate is terminally ill, with only months to live.)" Whoever has Hillary as his V.P. should watch his back. AF1 might develop mechanical problems, like engines detaching from the wings (happens all the time...). Heck, if I were Pres with Hillary as veep, I'd have a food taster. "I, Claudius" got nuthin on her.
15
posted on
09/18/2003 6:46:59 AM PDT
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: PBRSTREETGANG
However, Hillary Broadass Clinton will not run as VP.Is that a definite or just an opinion?
16
posted on
09/18/2003 6:48:30 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Gen Clark, you mean the guy who jumps over buildings, faster than speeing bullets, faster than a speeding train? Wow! Ummmmm, whats his name again?
17
posted on
09/18/2003 6:52:43 AM PDT
by
gulfcoast6
(Lord, you are the potter, I am the clay, please mold me every day)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
18
posted on
09/18/2003 6:53:39 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(........I LOVE pushing the abuse button.........)
To: boris
You've got that right! The Ankle as VP would have the president Arkancided making her the president. Which would also allow her to choose her own VP - hello Bubba. The 'toons would OWN the White House. (At least until the military decided enough was enough.)
19
posted on
09/18/2003 6:55:32 AM PDT
by
11B3
(Two choices: Republican or Communist. You know it's true.)
To: sheltonmac
For the last couple of months I have predicted that Hillary will run with Clark as her VP. I stand by that prediction.Our local talk radio host came up with an even scarier scenario yesterday...Clark as President and Bill Clinton as VP. They said it was within the bounds of the Constitution (???), and that if something happened to Clark, Bill could serve as President again (since he would be "appointed", not elected). Hillary could then run in 2012, giving her more time under her belt as Senator. As someone above stated, the only kink in this plan might be Guliani running against her in '06 and winning, the talk radio host did not take that into consideration.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson