[NormsRevenge]

What is Arnold's stance on Indian gaming? Does anyone know 8-? I guess they are just another special interest, huh? Who the heck isn;t these days?

btw, the amount of money Tom has accepted from the Indians is at least 1/10th of what Cruz has received over their respective careers much less this campaign, if not less, but that wouldn't be fair to mention now, would it? I'll gladly post the numbers if you wish to see them.

And what is wrong with supporting the Indians rights of sovereignty?

Gee!! Maybe Tom and Arnold could have discussed this last week on the radio if Arnold hadn't high-tailed it, running from a chance to clarify or even offer some positions on issues that obviously get some certain "FR" folks undies in such a bunch?

To me, Arnold is the one who seems to be the one gambling recklessly.

Personally, I don't like the odds that he is who he says he is and will do what he says he will.

invokes Reagan's 11th ..( like it works on rabid Arnold supporters anyway) ;-)

[cyncooper]

So how much have the tribes contributed to McClintock in the past for his stance on Indian sovereignty?

I do believe the answer is nothing.

They do not want McClintock to win. They want to divide the Republican vote.

I heard their Bustamante ads described yesterday and they present him as California's savior.

[KellyAdmirer]

I'm not sure why you naturally assume that the candidate who is not taking the money is somehow worse on this issue than the one who is (McClintock apparently is solidly for gaming - are you saying that the mere possibility that Arnold is against it is bad? Somehow that would not bother me).

I will note in passing that Mr. McClintock certainly is putting his supporters such as yourself through some very uncomfortable-looking contortions on this issue, and by not taking the money, Arnold is not doing the same to his supporters. :)