Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Price of Patriotism
DaveBlackOnline.com ^ | 09/16/2003 | David Alan Black

Posted on 09/18/2003 5:15:17 AM PDT by sheltonmac

Our national anthem, The Star Spangled Banner, was written by Francis Scott Key during the British attack on Fort McHenry on September 13, 1814. The British bombardment, which continued for 25 hours, involved 1,500 bombshells that weighed as much as 220 pounds and carried lighted fuses that would cause them to blow up when they reached their target. Not being very dependable, the bombs often exploded in midair.

Picture - "The Flag Is Full Of Stars"Key watched the battle with apprehension, knowing that as long as the shelling continued, Fort McHenry had not surrendered. Long before daylight there came a sudden and mysterious silence. What Key did not know was that the British attack had been abandoned, the attackers judging Baltimore as being too costly a prize.

In the predawn darkness, Key waited for the sight that would end his anxiety: the sight of Fort Henry’s great flag blowing in the breeze. When at last daylight came, the flag was still there!

Forty-seven years later, Francis Scott Key’s grandson would be arrested by order of President Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus on April 27, 1861, was based upon his conviction that any person not unconditionally supportive of the war against the South was guilty of treason. In a classic example of political jabberwocky, Lincoln stated, “Arrests by process of courts and arrests in cases of rebellion do not proceed altogether upon the same basis. In the latter case the arrests are made not so much for what has been done, as for what probably would be done.” In other words, what a person might do could now get him arrested by federal authorities!

Because Maryland’s sympathies were with the South, Lincoln interceded to make sure it wouldn’t pass an ordinance of secession. He had Maryland legislators arrested, along with other leading citizens, including newspaper publishers. One of those imprisoned was Francis Key Howard, the editor of the Baltimore Exchange. As he sat imprisoned in Fort McHenry, Howard penned the following words. Ironically, the date was September 13, 1861.

When I looked out in the morning, I could not help being struck by an odd and not pleasant coincidence. On that day, forty-seven years before, my grandfather, Mr. F. S. Key, the prisoner on a British ship, had witnessed the bombardment of Ft. McHenry. When on the following morning the hospital fleet drew off, defeated, he wrote the song so long popular throughout the country, the “Star Spangled Banner.” As I stood upon the very scene of that conflict, I could not but contrast my position with his, forty-seven years before. The flag which he had then so proudly hailed, I saw waving at the same place over the victims of as vulgar and brutal a despotism as modern times have witnessed.

Later, Howard was removed from Fort McHenry to the casemate prison at Fortress Monroe, imprisoned because the federal government “had in its possession ample evidence of the fact, that all who had been arrested had in some way violated the laws.” After further imprisonments in Fort Lafayette in New York Harbor and Fort Warren in Boston, Howard was finally released on November 27, 1862. Upon his discharge from prison, he wrote these powerful words: “We came out of prison just as we had gone in, holding the same just scorn and detestation [for] the despotism under which the country was prostrate, and with a stronger resolution that ever to oppose it by every means to which, as American freemen, we had the right to resort.”

Four months before being discovered and deported to a Nazi concentration camp, Anne Frank wrote in her now famous diary: “I want to go on living even after my death.” Anne Frank wanted to make a lasting difference in her world. As we see the storms of despotism arise in our nation, we, too, must see the importance of being concerned and involved.

I believe every follower of Jesus Christ who values liberty must be responsible to do something. I also suggest that every believer in Jesus Christ must stand up for faithfulness to Scripture, for the founding principles of this nation, and for obedience to Christ’s call to resist the oppressors and destroyers of this age. Doing something, even if it feels hopeless or seems insignificant, is better than doing nothing at all. We are commissioned by our Lord onto the streets, footpaths, and byways of the world to minister to the whole person, whoever he or she may be.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: fortmchenry; history; nationalanthem; oldglory

1 posted on 09/18/2003 5:15:17 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; Aurelius; Tauzero; JoeGar; stainlessbanner; Intimidator; ThJ1800; SelfGov; Triple; ...
*ping*
2 posted on 09/18/2003 5:15:56 AM PDT by sheltonmac (The difference? One party believes in big government; the other party has a jackass for a mascot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus on April 27, 1861, was based upon his conviction that any person not unconditionally supportive of the war against the South was guilty of treason. In a classic example of political jabberwocky, Lincoln stated, “Arrests by process of courts and arrests in cases of rebellion do not proceed altogether upon the same basis. In the latter case the arrests are made not so much for what has been done, as for what probably would be done.” In other words, what a person might do could now get him arrested by federal authorities!

This anti-American hunk of dog-crap is the guy we build monuments to?

3 posted on 09/18/2003 5:20:09 AM PDT by AAABEST (I phoned the pest control department and their response was to send me a leaflet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
... Doing something, even if it feels hopeless or seems insignificant ...
I shall chew bubble gum until justice flows through our land like a mighty river. Or until I run out of bubble gum.
4 posted on 09/18/2003 5:22:42 AM PDT by Asclepius (karma vigilante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Nice find. Non-ideological conservatism at its best.
5 posted on 09/18/2003 5:28:41 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Bring the boys back home, George.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
"Or until I run out of bubble gum."

And then its time to kick ass.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

6 posted on 09/18/2003 5:28:51 AM PDT by wku man (Carolina 12, Bucs 9...I'm so embarrassed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
You highlighted the same paragraph that struck me. And I too wonder why he is worshipped.
7 posted on 09/18/2003 5:39:46 AM PDT by 4CJ (Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
I've linked to Dave Black on my website, and I'll probably be posting more of his articles here. I've really liked what I've read so far.
8 posted on 09/18/2003 5:42:06 AM PDT by sheltonmac (The difference? One party believes in big government; the other party has a jackass for a mascot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
This anti-American hunk of dog-crap is the guy we build monuments to?

Looks like he was a major believer in thoughtcrime. Had a few problems with freedom of the press IIRC as well.

9 posted on 09/18/2003 5:43:37 AM PDT by steve50 (Power takes as ingratitude the writhing of it's victims : Tagore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Thought I would post this link on this fine thread.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/January2001/0101LivingstonPaleo.html


The Litmus Test for American Conservatism
by Donald W. Livingston
"Abraham Lincoln is thought of by many as not only the greatest American statesman but as a great conservative. He was neither."
10 posted on 09/18/2003 6:05:22 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Bring the boys back home, George.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
based upon his conviction that any person not unconditionally supportive of the war against the South was guilty of treason.

Lincoln's position for preserving the union sounds familar in today's terms as well; "You are either for us or you are against us".

11 posted on 09/18/2003 6:11:18 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Anne Frank wrote in her now famous diary: “I want to go on living even after my death.”

Anne Frank also wrote; "How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world".

12 posted on 09/18/2003 6:13:17 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
This anti-American hunk of dog-crap is the guy we build monuments to?

It is well that men are not judged by a single entry but rather on the entire content of their ledger.

13 posted on 09/18/2003 6:20:10 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I have an opinion about why Lincoln is so worshipped.

Schools do not even come close to portraying the truth about him.

Most people think Lincoln freed all the slaves (false - slavery was legal in many 'Union' states until well after the war)

He freed the slaves before the war (false - The E.P. was written well after the start of the war),

That hostilities began only after racist, Southern, US citizens attacked (false - blockading a port has always been recognized as an act of war, and the southerners were no more racist than the Northerners).

Those Southerners then decided to seceed (false - SC seceeded long before the port was blockaded)

The southern states never seceeded legally (false - the state legislatures conviened and voted to seceed, and Jefferson Davis was never given a day in court - because the North feared losing.)

14 posted on 09/18/2003 6:39:36 AM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Triple
blockading a port has always been recognized as an act of war

But Charleston wasn't blockaded.

15 posted on 09/19/2003 4:05:54 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
What is your position, that the Union presence in Fort Sumpter just to collect a tax on shipping to Charleston, which does not constitute a blockade?

Or that Fort Sumpter had no purpose?

16 posted on 09/19/2003 7:51:38 AM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Triple
What is your position, that the Union presence in Fort Sumpter just to collect a tax on shipping to Charleston, which does not constitute a blockade?

The Union presence in Fort Sumter was due to the fact that the U.S. government owned the fort. At no time did the troops in the fort interfere with shipping into and out of the port. On the contrary, it was the southern batteries who were firing at anything flying the Stars and Stripes.

17 posted on 09/19/2003 7:55:02 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
ok, thanks
18 posted on 09/19/2003 9:46:08 AM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson