Cool pics on the link above...
To: Libloather
When liberals murder civilians......
2 posted on
09/17/2003 3:41:59 PM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Libloather
3 posted on
09/17/2003 3:43:39 PM PDT by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: Libloather; Shermy
He is General McClellan. His entry into the race permits the Democrats to be for and against the war simultaneously.
The US has a Democrat majority, and Republicans always have to attract some crossover Democrats to win any election. The Democrats, to win, only have to unite.
The Democrat hard-core is anti-war all the way, but as an anti-war party they can't win. But as a pro-war party they will lose the hard-core.
To unite, they have to be both pro-war and anti-war at the same time, out of the same mouth, in the same breath. McClellan, er, Clark, can do that.
If he wants to live to a ripe old age, enjoy his grandchildren and be one of the party's elder statesmen, he needs to be careful who he chooses as his running mate, however. But that is probably beyond his control at this point. The hook has been baited and set.
7 posted on
09/17/2003 4:11:07 PM PDT by
marron
To: Libloather
If Weasely Clark is Ashley Wilkes, does that mean that long strip of of infected gristle Stooge Reno is Scarlett?!?
- shudder -
To: Libloather
With Hillary as his VP, will Clark be dying for her to be President?
19 posted on
09/17/2003 7:10:58 PM PDT by
GOPJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson