Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buck72
Pat's right about this. We need to level the playing field by using tarrifs and lowering the burden of regulations and taxes on American companies.

Pat's been right about Trade and Immigration for at least a decade, and the only RINO response is usually: "well, he's a racist, homophobe, protectionist, anti-Semite, who can't be elected, and that's why he's wrong on Immigration and Trade."

228 posted on 09/17/2003 10:52:00 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: bimbo
Pat's been right about Trade and Immigration for at least a decade,

He has?? He was saying the Japanese were going to destroy us economically over a decade ago. He said after NAFTA we were done for. A decade later our economy is as strong as it has ever been while Japan's has been in a decade-long decline.

234 posted on 09/17/2003 10:54:43 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: bimbo
"Pat's been right about Trade and Immigration for at least a decade, and the only RINO response is usually: "well, he's a racist, homophobe, protectionist, anti-Semite, who can't be elected, and that's why he's wrong on Immigration and Trade." "

And you can throw in that Pat was right about foreign entanglements bringing war to our shores, accepting gay and abortion practices is destructive to America, and China should not be a 'most favored trading nation'. You know Pat is right, when Goebbel's big lie name-calling is the retort.

248 posted on 09/17/2003 11:01:14 AM PDT by ex-snook (Americans needs PROTECTIONISM - military and economic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: bimbo; Tokhtamish
You know who else agrees with Pat that free trade is bad? The lunatic left. Here's a list of your fellow travelers who protest against the WTO & GATT:

Tom Hayden (former head of SDS and a Marxist)
Ralph Nader (Head of Green Party)
AFL-CIO
Socialist Workers of Britain

As Pat became more isolationist he also becomes more anti-free market. Watching Pat, it is pretty clear that he can't be against immigration and opposed to free trade without also becoming more and more sympathetic to subsidies and various social welfare programs (after all trade barriers are subsidies to domestic businesses).

Pat has recently advocated caps on executive pay, boosts in unemployment benefits and deplored the "harshness" of the free market. Are you on board with this?

255 posted on 09/17/2003 11:02:57 AM PDT by Recourse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson