Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John O
Not being a Hebrew scholar, my understanding is that the language would be better represented as "Jacob have I favored and Esau have I punished." or something to that effect.

In all things, though, we have to remember we are describing an infinite G-d with finite language. The First Commandment, wherein G-d says He is jealous, does not mean what it means if I am jealous because my wife is flirting with another man. It's just as close to what G-d means as you can get with human language.

Shalom.

71 posted on 09/19/2003 9:22:28 AM PDT by ArGee (Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: ArGee
This is true. All the commentaries (John Gill; Matthew Henry; Jamieson, Fausset, Brown) that I have access to at the moment seem to imply "reject" as a better word but still use "hate" in the description of these verses. I checked this to be sure I was correct in my usage. I haven't found anything in the commentaries to show me my error.

The important thing to remember though is that it is possible to love and hate something at the same time. Hate is not the opposite of love (even if the dictionary defines it that way)

Apathy is the opposite of love. You have to care about something in order to hate it.

Ah well, interesting (but ranging far off topic) discussion.

72 posted on 09/19/2003 9:35:11 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson