Skip to comments.
Report: Saddam Capture Soon
Geostrategy Direct.com ^
| September 16, 2003
| Bill Gertz Backgrounder Column
Posted on 09/16/2003 6:25:23 AM PDT by hotsheet
nothing further right now, just the bulletin..
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: billgertz; decapitation; geostrategy; iraq; saddam; viceisclosing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
09/16/2003 6:26:42 AM PDT
by
hotsheet
To: hotsheet
That is absurd. Even if they know what bedroom in what house he is staying in, there is no guarantee they will capture him alive. There have been reports that he is wearing a suicide belt. It probably is unsafe to capture him alive.
I would be happy for him to be dead. It might be better that way. If by capture, they mean his body will by ours one way or another, well then right on.
2
posted on
09/16/2003 6:29:15 AM PDT
by
dogbyte12
To: hotsheet
hotsheet Since Sep 15, 2003
Why don't you learn how to post before you attent it.
3
posted on
09/16/2003 6:29:27 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
To: hotsheet
Who's Soon and what does Saddam want with him?
4
posted on
09/16/2003 6:29:29 AM PDT
by
dead
(Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
To: dead
Gertz carries a lot of weight, although I did not know he was connected with this organization. I only now of his writing for the Washington Times and guesting on FNC.
5
posted on
09/16/2003 6:30:40 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: dead
Who's Soon and what does Saddam want with him? "Soon" is a she, and Saddam's wanted her ever since she made the news with Woody Allen.
6
posted on
09/16/2003 6:31:00 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: dead
Soon Soon and Sadaam later.
To: bmwcyle
before I what?
8
posted on
09/16/2003 6:31:31 AM PDT
by
hotsheet
To: hotsheet
I pray they are right, but I have to say, I've seen this claim before over the months. Perhaps it depends on the meaning of "soon."
9
posted on
09/16/2003 6:32:41 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: bmwcyle
Why don't you learn how to post before you attent it.
Geeeze - if you're going to gripe, at least spell attempt the right way. And, by the way, I think most sentences that start with the word "Why" are actually questions and should end with a question mark. So you should learn to do that too, prior to subjecting someone to your corrections.
10
posted on
09/16/2003 6:33:49 AM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: dead
That would be Saddam's Korean butler.
11
posted on
09/16/2003 6:34:21 AM PDT
by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
To: hotsheet
IF this is true, one wonders how such information could be known in the first place.
It's possible that they think they've got him trapped in a few-block area, and that he'd be found in a house-to-house search.
Much less likely, they've been in negotiations with him for surrender and exile.
Other than that, it's all just more speculation.
12
posted on
09/16/2003 6:34:26 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
Exile is unacceptable.
13
posted on
09/16/2003 6:35:35 AM PDT
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: AD from SpringBay
Can't spell "Cycle" right, either. Can spell "BMW" though.
To: hotsheet
Yeah, everybody should attent their scoons before posting them. It's the way we do things around here. I'm totally series.
15
posted on
09/16/2003 6:38:28 AM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(220.4 (-79.8) Earning back my youth one mile at a time)
To: bmwcyle
Why don't you learn how to post before you attent it. This still could be Hugh!
16
posted on
09/16/2003 6:39:59 AM PDT
by
50sDad
("There are FOUR LIGHTS! FOUR LIGHTS!")
To: hotsheet
...all I want to know is,Where's the beef?
To: dead
Who's Soon and what does Saddam want with him? Who is General Failure and why is he on my hard drive?
Who is Peer and why is he rejecting my Internet connection?
18
posted on
09/16/2003 6:41:53 AM PDT
by
50sDad
("There are FOUR LIGHTS! FOUR LIGHTS!")
To: cajungirl
Exile is unacceptable. You're right.
For the record, I don't think we are negotiating with him. But if we were, exile is the only reason Saddam would negotiate.
I don't particularly trust this bulletin: GeoStrategy's track record hasn't been very good.
19
posted on
09/16/2003 6:42:05 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
Soon, with Woody Allen...LOLOLOL!
20
posted on
09/16/2003 6:44:47 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(I may hide, but I never leave!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson