Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Korea: US Asks S. Korea for Thousands of Soldiers (for Iraq)
Korea Times ^ | 09/15/03 | Seo Soo-min

Posted on 09/15/2003 8:07:02 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

US Asks S. Korea for Thousands of Soldiers

By Seo Soo-min

Staff Reporter

The United States has asked South Korea for a light infantry division consisting of at least some 2,000-3,000 soldiers to keep the peace in Iraq, citing the Polish Division in Iraq as an example, a senior government official said yesterday.

``The United States has asked for a division of light infantry soldiers capable of operating on a self-sustainable basis,’’ the official said.

He added there was no mention of the exact size, although the Polish Division was mentioned as a likely model.

The request was made by Assistant Deputy Defense Secretary Richard Lawless to a senior Chong Wa Dae official on Sept. 4, on the sideline of his visit here for the alliance talks, he said.

The official said the Polish Division means ``not a full-sized division, but a downsized one which includes division headquarters, communications and transportation units as well as a brigade.’’

Poland sent some 2,300 soldiers to assist in the U.S.-led in Iraq. It is in charge of a multinational infantry division consisting of some 10,000 soldiers from 21 countries.

The official said about a dozen countries, including India, Pakistan and Turkey, had been asked by the U.S. to take part in the postwar efforts to stabilize Iraq, which have encountered much difficulty.

As for the length of the South Korean troops’ stay, he said one year _ until a civilian government forms in Iraq _ was likely.

``We have set no timetable for a decision on the (troop) dispatch issue,’’ the official said. ``But the South Korea-U.S. summit during the (Oct. 20-21) APEC summit could be a reference.’’

Defense Ministry officials said special warfare forces would likely make up the majority of the combat troops to part to Iraq, if a decision is made.

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld yesterday said the size of the international force could be anything from zero to between 10,000 and 15,000.

Washington is encountering difficulty in mobilizing additional troops from other countries to Iraq.

The government in Seoul is seen as tilting towards the troop dispatch despite heavy domestic criticism, in consideration of the overall security situation amidst the North Korean nuclear crisis.

Support for the U.S. could also throw weight behind South Korea in the ongoing discussion of U.S. troop realignment on the peninsula, but officials denied that they were planning a tradeoff with the U.S. with the Iraqi issue.

``Rather than expect an immediate return, we should pay attention to how the dispatch itself would contribute to our national interests, our profile in the international society as well as security and peace on the Korean peninsula,’’ the senior official said.

Unlike a U.N. peacekeeping force, which is under the U.N.’s command and is also funded by the organization, South Korea would pay for its own troops under the envisaged U.S. plan for commanding joint troops.

South Korea sent three combat divisions totaling 50,000 troops to assist the U.S. in the Vietnam War. It has mostly sent non-combat personnel to other international military operations, including 314 soldiers to the Gulf War and 486 soldiers to Afghanistan.

A total of 675 South Korean soldiers, mostly military engineers and medical personnel, are currently in Iraq.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allies; america; apec; dispatch; division; iraq; korea; lightinfantry; multinational; poland; skorea; southkorea; stabilizationforce
On the other hand, N. Korea has something to say ont this matter(from Yonhap News):

Meanwhile, North Korea urged South Korea not to dispatch combat troops to Iraq, saying that doing so would be "a mean pro-U.S. subservient act." "Submission to foreign forces in disregard of the dignity and the interests of the nation would lead the nation to disgraceful ruin and death," said the North's main newspaper, Rodong Sinmun.

"The South Korean authorities should ponder over the grave consequences to be entailed by their traitorous troop dispatch to Iraq and resolutely reject the U.S. demand for it," the paper said in a report carried by the country's Korean Central News Agency.

Charming fellows, N. Koreans are.

1 posted on 09/15/2003 8:07:03 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk
Ping!
2 posted on 09/15/2003 8:08:04 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Some day, and that day may never come, I'll call upon you to do a service for me....


3 posted on 09/15/2003 8:11:31 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (This tag line has been intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
My dad and my uncle were both in VietNam with the ROK troops... only areas were the VC AND NVA would NOT go. They were very afraid of the Koreans.

I would love to see that sort of thing happen in Iraq.
4 posted on 09/15/2003 8:23:28 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
I wonder why American troops weren't feared -- and what we can do to change that now. I'm sure it wasn't their fault.
5 posted on 09/15/2003 8:46:21 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: risk
s/feared/as feared/
6 posted on 09/15/2003 8:46:52 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
I don't thick I wnat to be in the Sunni Triangle is the Tiger Divison shows up.
7 posted on 09/15/2003 8:49:46 PM PDT by dts32041 ("Moderate Arab" he's the one who detonates his bomb via remote control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
I was about to post the same comment....

I have heard many personally state how savage the Korean soldiers were. The NVA and VC were frightened of them.
8 posted on 09/15/2003 9:14:00 PM PDT by jbstrick (Behold the Power of CHEESE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I made my last jump with South Korean SF; quite a tough bunch they are. True allies to boot, they lost over 5,000 troops in Nam. I expect this means they will kick in approximately 2,300 more to add to the current 675.... Self sustaining is a plus as they will not be under direct US oversight, but rather operating with aid and confidence.
9 posted on 09/15/2003 9:31:24 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risk
I wonder why American troops weren't feared?

Because the enemy had become aware that our troops were not going to be allowed to win the war.

10 posted on 03/07/2004 10:12:55 AM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jumper; luvbach1; TigerLikesRooster; ALOHA RONNIE
...[Koreans] lost over 5,000 troops in Nam...

On the edge of the free world, I guess it helps to motivate one to fight.

11 posted on 03/07/2004 2:42:22 PM PST by risk (NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson