Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1
mwll, I know that...I teach US constitution (am administera US Gov't test as I write), I was referring to jurisidiction as far as the fact that this is a STATE election. I think they are using VRA (Voting Rights Act) and FEC rules to jawbone a reason to get involved. Agree with Billybob that SCOTUS is likely to slap them down. again.
475 posted on 09/15/2003 11:41:39 AM PDT by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: Keith
Thanks for clarification. Part of the dirty deed here is that Davis is hoping that, even if the USSC reverses this asinine decision, he can play the "you are being disenfranchised" card with minority voters to increase their turnout to vote NO on the recall.

The RATS nationwide are also hoping to continue to stir the pot with minority voters in 2004... first Florida, now California... all brought to you by a conservative Supreme Court and George Bush... accusing the GOP of trying to fix elections, which is the exact opposite of the truth.

The reality is that the USSC should not get routinely involved in these election decisions -- it is dangerous for the Republic. And it sickens me that the RATS want to go down this pathway, which is terribly troubling for the future of the country -- they care more about near-term, raw political power than the health of a representative democracy.
513 posted on 09/15/2003 11:52:53 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson