Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians
WorldNetDaily ^ | 9-15-03 | Vox Day

Posted on 09/15/2003 1:50:36 AM PDT by ambrose

Satanic Schwarzeneggerians


Posted: September 15, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Vox Day


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

"I have gone back and forth on Schwarzenegger, so much that I almost have whiplash. But my new – my current – position on him is: To hell with him."

– Jay Nordlinger, National Review

I like Arnold, the bodybuilding evangelist and the movie star. But I have no regard for Mr. Schwarzenegger-Kennedy, the evasive politician. He's a man of the people now – give him a little more time and he'll be feeling our pain and doing everything "for the children." Fortunately, it didn't take long for Arnold to destroy himself as a viable candidate in the eyes of thinking conservatives everywhere. He was already suspect, indeed, anathema to those of us who believe in principles over party.

But he damned himself even with the pragmatists, those who care more for power, party and position than principle, with his dismissal as "right-wing crazies" those who support Proposition 54, which bans the state's collection of racial statistics on the population. How eminently fitting that a son of a National Socialist would fail to see the dangers in compiling such data! After all, without it, how can the state be expected to find those pesky Jews and Japanese in case it serves the interests of the children to round them up again?

The Republican enthusiasm for Arnold was initially based on his star power. It was nice, for a change, to see a Hollywood entity throw in with the GOP for once instead of barking mindlessly at it with the usual combination of vacuous accusations and cretinous insults. But his real support stemmed from his presumed electability, which sufficed to prevent numerous Democratic grandees from throwing their hats into the ring.

The problem is that the concept of electability is a massive crock of fumet. The Bush administration is demonstrating this truth in real-time, as its compassionate big-government neo-conservatism expands the federal leviathan at a pace faster than anyone since FDR. Would President Gore have been worse? Perhaps – but then there would be an opportunity to elect a man who actually opposed the rising tide of government in 2004 instead of surfing it like a cattle rancher gone beach-boy stoner.

Schwarzenegger, far from representing the salvation of California's Republican Party, stands for its complete immolation. He does not offer a philosophical alternative to California's self-destructive Democratic socialism; instead, he is a form of life-support for it. Instead of swearing to cut spending, he vows to beg more money from the federal government – demonstrating very clearly that this Republican is no republican!

Republicans in the state legislature have held their ground against the rapacious taxes proposed by Gov. Davis, and their obdurate political Manichaenism will allow them to do the same against Bustamante. But they will not be able to resist the same tax increases which would be proposed by a future Gov. Schwarzenegger. Furthermore, California Republicans will then be tarred by the same fiscal irresponsibility that now sticks only to their Democratic rivals, which, combined with their contemplated Schwarzeneggerian abandonment of cultural conservatives, will leave them wholly without a raison d'etre.

Pragmatism in politics is self-defeating in the long run. It is a euphemism for the slow sacrifice of one's principles. The constant substitution of "electable" moderates for principled conservatives is what repeatedly kills the Republican Party and prevents it from ever realizing even a small part of its platform when it is in power. It is particularly ironic when the electable moderates show themselves to be nothing of the sort, which in this particular case has already happened when the managing editor of the seminal National Review abjures the Great Teutonic Hope in no uncertain terms.

And those so-called Republicans who would drive a principled conservative like Tom McClintock from the race should hang their heads in shame. If they cannot fight for this candidate, they may as well abandon the battle altogether, for they are useless soldiers. It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento.

Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism.


Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian. He is a member of the SFWA, Mensa and the Southern Baptist Convention, and his weekly column is syndicated nationally by Universal Press Syndicate. He has been down with Madden since 1992.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: schwarzeneggerians; voxday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last
To: Robert_Paulson2
Oh, sorry ...

'T' is for "Terminator"

141 posted on 09/15/2003 1:59:34 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
No one could ever break one of those!

Arnold knows it would be politically damaging when he did so, so he won't take a pledge he knows he'll break.

142 posted on 09/15/2003 2:11:18 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I don't think you have any reason to fear that, Roscoe.

The truth is, you'd call him a liar if he DID sign it. He might be the only one who is being honest and realistic - but he can't win with you, so there's no point in even batting this around.
143 posted on 09/15/2003 3:31:55 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
you'd call him a liar if he DID sign it.

I'd wait till he broke the pledge. How about you?

144 posted on 09/15/2003 11:59:53 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Well I'm glad to hear that, Roscoe, because that would be the right thing to do.
145 posted on 09/16/2003 12:05:23 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
And what would you say if he broke it?
146 posted on 09/16/2003 12:07:12 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Signed the "no increase in taxes under any circumstances" pledge and broke it, you mean?

Well, since he didn't sign it - let's use McClintock as an example instead, okay? ('Cause he did, right?) If McClintock signed it and broke it, what I would say would depend on the reason he broke it, I think. If it was for something that could be avoided, it would make a big difference to me. If it was for something there was just no getting around, I think I could cut him some slack.

I hate taxes, and believe me, we pay MORE than our "fair share" of them...but I was not one of those who refused to vote for Bush 41 because he broke his pledge. Maybe I'm the odd one out here, but I think it's an offense I can forgive under certain circumstances.
147 posted on 09/16/2003 12:44:12 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Boo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
LOL!!! You're kidding right?! Alright allow me to refute. Arnold is not the devil and you do not serve satan if you vote for him.

This is the most retarded thread ever and now I most question your judgement for defending it.
148 posted on 09/16/2003 2:10:07 PM PDT by Tempest (Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Absolutely disgraceful comments.

Yep, Arnold's defense of officially sanctioned racial classification is indeed disgraceful.

149 posted on 09/17/2003 5:50:02 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"And those so-called Republicans who would drive a principled conservative like Tom McClintock from the race should hang their heads in shame. If they cannot fight for this candidate, they may as well abandon the battle altogether, for they are useless soldiers. It is better to spend 40 years in the political wilderness than to forsake one's soul for all the kingdoms of the world, much less four years in Sacramento.
Still worse, however, are the right-side commentators who urge conservatives to abandon their principles and line up behind this false Republican god. To sacrifice your own soul to the naked pursuit of power is bad enough, to tempt others to do likewise is not just the ultimate in negative campaigning, it is pure political Satanism."
HEAR, HEAR!!!!
150 posted on 09/18/2003 7:59:19 PM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Vox Day is a novelist and Christian libertarian.

Oh yeh, that combination always produces cognitive writings!
Here is a picture of Mr. Day, from www.worldnetdaily.com/news/archives:


151 posted on 09/18/2003 8:14:15 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson