Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barracks Emporer Alert!!(Gen. Clark gains favor fast in poll)
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | 14 Sep 03 | By Donald Lambro

Posted on 09/14/2003 12:07:11 PM PDT by .cnI redruM

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark immediately would become one of the top five candidates for the Democratic nomination if he enters the presidential race, according to the latest Gallup Poll.

As Gen. Clark prepares to announce his decision sometime this week about whether he will get into the contest, a national survey of nearly 500 Democrats for USA Today and CNN found that the former commander of NATO forces in Europe could take away nearly 10 percent of the vote from his potential rivals.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; dems; donaldlambro; election04; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Wesley Clark circles like a hammerhead shark!!
1 posted on 09/14/2003 12:07:14 PM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Wesley Clark nearly started WWIII in Kosovo, He is UNFIT to hold any office in govt. Read here and tell everybody you know!!:


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/981521/posts

Prairie
2 posted on 09/14/2003 12:09:28 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
Or else what?

If you really want to complain to the admin moderator that I excerpt articles and you have to actually click on a link to read the entire thing, complain and be done with it.
4 posted on 09/14/2003 12:16:28 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Faster, Better, Cheaper. 2 out of 3 is the best you'll get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Good. Build him up, presstitutes. All the better to knock him down. When America get's a good look at this freak, Ross Perot will suddenly seem like a paragon of mental stability and humility.
5 posted on 09/14/2003 12:18:32 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
All you need to know about Wes Clark is that he is an Arkansas friend of Bill Clinton's and went from a one-star to four-stars while Bubba was in office. How many two-stars regularly had lunch with The President? He's nothing but a Clinton butt-boy.
6 posted on 09/14/2003 12:32:22 PM PDT by HAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
If you want a General atleast bring in a war hero not a political hack and Clinton appointee. Yeah he's smart so what? General Peter Dawkins USMA class of 60' made general at a younger age than Clark and was also a Rhodes Scholar. Unfortuately for the USA he left the service ( as a BG?) and never entered politics except for considering to run against Mario Cuomo. (Which by the way worried Mario.)Clarke is no real time hero but the press will make him one. I believe Clark is the kind of person that can really "talk" himself into getting a position. Yes he was Commander of NATO, but it was during a time when they were doing diddly squat.
7 posted on 09/14/2003 12:36:36 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Where is Hillary's Living History now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; hchutch
Wesley Clark circles like a hammerhead shark!!

And most of America says, "Wesley who? Wasn't he the annoying brat on Star Trek The Next Generation?"

8 posted on 09/14/2003 12:38:22 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From a Fox news site: "The White House actually back in February apparently tried to get me knocked off CNN and they wanted to do this because they were afraid that I would raise issues with their conduct of the war," Clark told Newsradio 620 KTAR. "Apparently they called CNN. I don't have all the proof on this because they didn't call me. I've only heard rumors about it." [end]

Weak, general, weak. Tell two lies in the morning and call us.

From the same Fox news site: Clark claimed publicly that after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, he was pressured by the Bush administration to link the attacks directly to Iraq. When pressed on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes show, Clark refused to name White House names and instead fingered a public policy think tank in Canada. [end]

Better but not up to today's Democract standards. Watch two interviews with Kruz Bustamante (D, Mexico) and get back to us.

9 posted on 09/14/2003 12:44:43 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
BWAHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

That was a good one. In the general election, Wesley would be Krusched!
10 posted on 09/14/2003 12:47:06 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Faster, Better, Cheaper. 2 out of 3 is the best you'll get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"Faster, better, cheaper ... "

I presume your tagline pertains to weapons development. If so, I don't care that they're not cheaper. Seeing terrorists turned into a pink mist is PRICELESS.
11 posted on 09/14/2003 12:50:25 PM PDT by AngrySpud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Actually, there may be a larger cabal at work. This crap is perhaps part of a triangulation being pulled on the American people, as a means to get hatellary rodhamster nominated for the democrat presidential race ... most of the nine mental defective democrats are anti-war on terrorism as waged by this administration, but Clark can be paraded as tough on enemies (remember his war from 15,000 feet, killing people who have been our allies for nearly a hundred year?). As hatellary's running mate, he would appease the democrats who are disgusted with the anti-war on terror spittlebreaths running for the nomination.
12 posted on 09/14/2003 12:53:24 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AngrySpud
Spud,

I've worked at JPL and OTC. It pertains to just about any high-tech endeavor you'd care to attempt.
13 posted on 09/14/2003 12:57:07 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (Faster, Better, Cheaper. 2 out of 3 is the best you'll get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Hillary alert.

She is manipulating him like a sock puppet. This way she will look less responsible for driving all the other leftist losers out of the race. Then Clark will falter and graciously agree to be her VP.
14 posted on 09/14/2003 1:02:17 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
That Clark would be a favorite, only tells me how weak the demos are.
15 posted on 09/14/2003 1:04:30 PM PDT by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The Democratic Party, looking to unseat a Republican President whom they regard as a bumbling fool who has led the country into a military quagmire, turns to a general noted for his incompetence, arrogance, and overweening ambition:


16 posted on 09/14/2003 1:06:31 PM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Little Mac Lives!
17 posted on 09/14/2003 1:12:16 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
That guy would sell out America to the u.n.in a heartbeat.
18 posted on 09/14/2003 2:09:49 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Any General who was trusted by Clinton is immediatley suspect..
19 posted on 09/14/2003 2:12:13 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAS
I agree you on Clark's role with Clinton. But I also believe that it's important to be able to state this almost HUGE blunder which certainly would have turned into an international incident, but only for the grace of two other more rational military commanders refusing to obey Clark's dingbat orders.

This episode should speak VOLUMES to people, but not if they don't know about it or don't remember it.

Prairie
20 posted on 09/14/2003 3:22:54 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson