Posted on 09/14/2003 6:53:07 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
or Search by State |
· | Contact The Media |
or Search by State |
|
|
Copyright © 2003 The Associated Press.
|
Could be because he never had a real job and spend his life mooching off the public dole. It also sounds like he's admitting he was a grifter all along.
Then why did the gap between the upper and middle class grow more during the eight years of Clinton than any other eight year period in the last 100 years?
Clinton has lied so often, so successfully, about so much, that now he tells lies like this one -- which anyone who gives it the least thought would know is a bald-faced prevarication. He has, as it were, broken through the sound barrier of mere lies and into the the realm of hyper-sonic dishonesty.
Every time I see the name of this so-called man in print, it makes me sick. But I don't mean to be too critical.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Paying the Wrong Piper," discussion thread on FR. Article is also on ChronWatch.
This interprets as
"I never saved anything less than a dollar"
"I did not have sex with that woman,... Miss Lewinsky, not one time" (many times)
So, who's he blaming who for poor $$$ management?
His salary was above that of most people, and he got free housing and plenty of perks. Probably never had to pay for a meal anywhere, and forget about tipping. Trips around the world for him, his family and a few hundred of his "closest friends" paid for by the taxpayers.
Under those circumstances he should have had a tidy sum, considering he's been feeding at the public trough for most of his adult life.
BTW, I hear cocaine use is a very expensive habit.
ROFL!
He never stops playing the word games. There are two possibilities here.
One, the article dropped the "a" before decade. In that case, a decade only goes back to the 1994 mid-term elections. So the only fields of Democratic contenders that he's referring to is the 1996 field where he was the only candidate and the 2000 field where only Gore and Bradley were candidates.
I wonder if he's admitting just how lame he, Gore and Bradley are? *eg*
Or, in the second case, the quote is correct and he's only referring to the current decade, which removes him from the equation, leaving Gore and Bradley.
Heck, on further reflection, he's probably defining the decade as starting in 2001, so he's praising them as the strongest field when compared to no others. LOL!
So he's either insulting them and/or insulting Gore and Bradley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.