So you consider Bustamante a conservative and prefer him to Arnold?
Their phone message was offensive.
They could have just said nice things about Tom, urging people to vote for him. I could understand that, although I think it is highly misguided, to be charitable.
But instead, they chose to attack another Republican, rather viciously, at that.
This is NOT a primary.
I guess it's the "Dog in the manger" or "scorched earth" attitude: if Tom can't win, than another Republic shouldn't either, let California be destroyed under Dem "leadership".
DId you see this article?
This is exactly the kind of bill that Davis and Bustamante can't wait to sign, and Arnold would veto. (It's irrelevant what Tom would do, because he has zero chance of being elected)
CA State Senate approves health insurance bill
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/981520/posts "The California Senate voted 24 to 14 today to require employers to provide health coverage for up to 1.5 million uninsured California workers, sending the measure to the state Assembly for action. "
Tom McClintock is nearing T status as far as I am concerned.
They could have just said nice things about Tom, urging people to vote for him. I could understand that, although I think it is highly misguided, to be charitable. But instead, they chose to attack another Republican, rather viciously, at that. This is NOT a primary. So, I'm sure that you're equally offended by the FReepers who are spending all their time attacking McClintock, in word and in photoshop, instead of spending their time saying nice things about Arnold.
No, I didn't think you were. You're just feigning offense at CRA in a silly attempt to further bash McClintock.